Obama Appoints A "Urban Affairs Czar"

RockX

Banned
New Urban Affairs Czar
Jeanette Colville
Change comes to America, as promised by President Barack Obama, with the establishment of the brand new White House Office of Urban Affairs.

This new presidential urban power house is a critical need according to the former community organizer and agitator, because "urban areas are where 80% of the American people live and work."

Heading up this high level operation is the controversial Bronx Borough President Adolfo Carrion along with second in command, New York Governor Patterson's Washington lobbyist Derek Douglas.

Michael Mcauliff of the New York Daily News reports Obama's announcement.

"The Urban Affairs office will focus on wise investments and development in our urban areas that will create employment and housing opportunities and make our country more competitive, prosperous, and strong," he said by way of explaining the new office.

Carrion's appointment is seen by some as a nod to Latino voters who helped put Obama in the White House. Obama has already named two Hispanics to his cabinet, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Labor Secretary-designate Hilda Solis.

Douglas started working for Gov. Paterson in 2007, lobbying for the state's interests after working for the Center for American Progress, the liberal think tank headed by John Podesta, who ran Obama's White House transition.


Others dispute the accomplishments of the Bronx President, noting that the major urban development projects for which Carrion takes credit were made possible by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. A website established by Bronx residents to "tell the rest of the story", countering Carrion's public relations office, writes:

As for urban development, the major projects that have moved forward in The Bronx during the past seven years were all generated out of Mayor Michael Bloomberg's office.

Carrion has shown no real initiative to rebuild The Bronx's economic standing, and at best has stayed out of the way while other offices worked. The Bronx's unemployment rate is still the highest in the State, and its poverty rate is still one of the highest in the nation. That was true when Carrion came into power, and that remains true today. Has Carrion been effective in changing that? Clearly, the answer is no.


One thing that may boost Mr. Carrion's and Mr. Douglas's popularity among Obama's inner circle of power is their record of success at pleasing Big Labor by keeping American's favorite store, WalMart, out of every borough of New York City. Much to the detriment of consumers, New York City unions and their friends in high places have kept prices high and choice restricted for low income consumers.


Get ready to see the cities of Detroit, Cleveland, and Chicago look like the Gilded Age; meanwhile, us folks who “cling to our guns and religion” will just be responsible for paying for the inner-city renaissance. Maybe the Urban Czar should focus on keeping urban mayors out of jail.
 
You think he's paid his taxes? Or do they still have that question missing on the questionnaire?
 
New Urban Affairs Czar
Jeanette Colville
Change comes to America, as promised by President Barack Obama, with the establishment of the brand new White House Office of Urban Affairs.

This new presidential urban power house is a critical need according to the former community organizer and agitator, because "urban areas are where 80% of the American people live and work."

Heading up this high level operation is the controversial Bronx Borough President Adolfo Carrion along with second in command, New York Governor Patterson's Washington lobbyist Derek Douglas.

Michael Mcauliff of the New York Daily News reports Obama's announcement.

"The Urban Affairs office will focus on wise investments and development in our urban areas that will create employment and housing opportunities and make our country more competitive, prosperous, and strong," he said by way of explaining the new office.

Carrion's appointment is seen by some as a nod to Latino voters who helped put Obama in the White House. Obama has already named two Hispanics to his cabinet, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Labor Secretary-designate Hilda Solis.

Douglas started working for Gov. Paterson in 2007, lobbying for the state's interests after working for the Center for American Progress, the liberal think tank headed by John Podesta, who ran Obama's White House transition.


Others dispute the accomplishments of the Bronx President, noting that the major urban development projects for which Carrion takes credit were made possible by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. A website established by Bronx residents to "tell the rest of the story", countering Carrion's public relations office, writes:

As for urban development, the major projects that have moved forward in The Bronx during the past seven years were all generated out of Mayor Michael Bloomberg's office.

Carrion has shown no real initiative to rebuild The Bronx's economic standing, and at best has stayed out of the way while other offices worked. The Bronx's unemployment rate is still the highest in the State, and its poverty rate is still one of the highest in the nation. That was true when Carrion came into power, and that remains true today. Has Carrion been effective in changing that? Clearly, the answer is no.


One thing that may boost Mr. Carrion's and Mr. Douglas's popularity among Obama's inner circle of power is their record of success at pleasing Big Labor by keeping American's favorite store, WalMart, out of every borough of New York City. Much to the detriment of consumers, New York City unions and their friends in high places have kept prices high and choice restricted for low income consumers.


Get ready to see the cities of Detroit, Cleveland, and Chicago look like the Gilded Age; meanwhile, us folks who “cling to our guns and religion” will just be responsible for paying for the inner-city renaissance. Maybe the Urban Czar should focus on keeping urban mayors out of jail.

guns yes, religion no...rev rich
 
So much sweat about this as if its something bad.

What a hate filled pile of nothingness some of you insist on remaining.
 
So much sweat about this as if its something bad.

What a hate filled pile of nothingness some of you insist on remaining.

So one must be "hate filled" to question Obama? Isn't the whole idea of speaking "truth to power" is to question what that power is doing instead of just whole hardily accepting it?
 
So one must be "hate filled" to question Obama? Isn't the whole idea of speaking "truth to power" is to question what that power is doing instead of just whole hardily accepting it?

You didn't get the memo? It's unpatriotic to question the government since 11/4/08. Wouldn't be surprised to see it made into law, sooner than later.
 
You didn't get the memo? It's unpatriotic to question the government since 11/4/08. Wouldn't be surprised to see it made into law, sooner than later.

HAHAHA

Wow, how quickly things change. The opposition becomes exactly like the other guys when they win power, and vice versa.
 
The only worry I have about this is that it is coming about in conjunction with the change in who runs the census.

If the census is placed under whitehouse control, they will have the ability to estimate numbers instead of having to count heads. This gives the ability to overestimate the numbers of people in urban areas. And since we will, no doubt, be funding this based on population from the census, I see way too much room for abuse.
 
You're the one who made the retarded comment. I just responded with the obvious "no duh" that anyone could have made...

You still nitpick over all the wrong things. Seriously, you guys nickel and dime minorities out of services then go and invade irrelevant countries.
 
You still nitpick over all the wrong things. Seriously, you guys nickel and dime minorities out of services then go and invade irrelevant countries.

Apparently you didn't understand what Sol was saying. But I could care less if you choose to stop being obtuse or not. Just because you can point to something that is a waste of money (Iraq), doesn't mean you can make up for the points you lose in condoning other wasteful spending.
 
Apparently you didn't understand what Sol was saying. But I could care less if you choose to stop being obtuse or not. Just because you can point to something that is a waste of money (Iraq), doesn't mean you can make up for the points you lose in condoning other wasteful spending.

I'm not condoning wasteful spending. I'm saying you guys look silly getting huffy and puffy about welfare and a few hundred million for whatever here or there, then when they've got you looking the other direction (FAGS MARRYING!) they go and spend a few trillion on something useless (Iraq).
 
Back
Top