Taft2016
Verified User
Sorry you are correct, he was then acquitted at trial.
And why was he disbarred in his home state of Arkansas?
Sorry you are correct, he was then acquitted at trial.
Perjury, also known as forswearing, is the willful act of swearing a false oath or of falsifying an affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning matters material to an official proceeding. That is, the witness falsely promises to tell the truth about matters which affect the outcome of the proceeding. For example, it is not considered perjury to lie about one's age unless age is a factor in determining the legal result, such as eligibility for old age retirement benefits. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perjury
He was never convicted of anything.Convicted perjuring adulterers who have been impeached and disbarred deserve our nations' highest honor, because you claim a poll says they were popular in 1998?
He was never convicted of anything.
Yes, but impeachment is the equivalent of being indicted. Many people are indicted only to be acquitted later.Did the House of Representatives impeach him for perjury?
Yes, but impeachment is the equivalent of being indicted. Many people are indicted only to be acquitted later.
was he not being questioned about marital infidelity or some such crap?????Perjury has the additional element that the lie must be material to the subject of the proceeding for which the affiant was testifying.
in that situation, wouldn't your lawyer object on those grounds?If you were taking my deposition regarding the legality of a land deal, and you ask as an aside if I had sex with my secretary, and I lied... that would not be perjury.
Further, I have gone over this repeatedly. Clinton never committed perjury in the Paul Jones deposition. Perjury is the crime of making a knowingly false statement which bears on the outcome of an official proceeding that is required to be testified to under oath. Clinton lied about having consensual sex with Lewinsky when the issue at hand was sexual harassment. Under the federal rules of evidence, evidence of a consensual affair, even in the work place is not admissible as evidence of sexual harassment. He did obstruct which the judge in the case found and his licence to practice law was taken.