you're kidding ib1.....
to each according to their needs....
lmao...
did obama really say what you claim in the OP....
Yes.
great, so wtf is "needs" based.....
number of children, age, skin color....education....
if obama said this...he is a facking moron
It makes perfect sense. If someone grows up in rural Kansas and has slightly worse grades than the kid who went to private school, he should be considered because of the disadvantage given to him by his economic situation (or the advantage given to the private school kid by his).
Moving it away from race-based to needs-based makes very good sense.
link....
so we can do away with obama is not for socialism, thanks for that
so obama and you are for marxism....thanks for that
you're kidding ib1.....
to each according to their needs....
lmao...
did obama really say what you claim in the OP....
Yes.
Yeah, this has everything to do with Marxism.
you tell me...........
you already said yes
communism, marxism.....that is exactly what you and obama are advocating...socialism is but a sister of that idea, don't play stupid
It makes perfect sense. If someone grows up in rural Kansas and has slightly worse grades than the kid who went to private school, he should be considered because of the disadvantage given to him by his economic situation (or the advantage given to the private school kid by his).
Moving it away from race-based to needs-based makes very good sense.
I'm just glad the left is finally admitting AA is racist policy. That is indeed a sign of progress!
Your example is hilarious! Rural Kansans don't have any private schools? And what possible concern is it of mine, as an employer, what the economic circumstances of someone might have been? This has nothing really to do with what I seek to employ them for, so why is this my concern? And how, as a prospective employer, am I to determine who's 'economic situation' was better or worse than the other? Perhaps the private school pinhead had an alcoholic dad and dead mother, and no one to show him love? Maybe he was shoved off in a private school against his will, and he always dreamed he could be a rural Kansas boy, going to hick school? ....Fuck, what the hell do I know about someones 'situation' in ANY scenario?
Oh, but that is where GOVERNMENT comes in, right? THEY will tell me who to hire, based on their profound wisdom and stereotypical prejudices, and whom THEY feel is most suitable to work for me! And I am supposed to go along with this, because I am paying out the money for insurance, retirement, pension plan, sick leaves, vacation... Why, again???
I'm just glad the left is finally admitting AA is racist policy. That is indeed a sign of progress!
Your example is hilarious! Rural Kansans don't have any private schools? And what possible concern is it of mine, as an employer, what the economic circumstances of someone might have been? This has nothing really to do with what I seek to employ them for, so why is this my concern? And how, as a prospective employer, am I to determine who's 'economic situation' was better or worse than the other? Perhaps the private school pinhead had an alcoholic dad and dead mother, and no one to show him love? Maybe he was shoved off in a private school against his will, and he always dreamed he could be a rural Kansas boy, going to hick school? ....Fuck, what the hell do I know about someones 'situation' in ANY scenario?
Oh, but that is where GOVERNMENT comes in, right? THEY will tell me who to hire, based on their profound wisdom and stereotypical prejudices, and whom THEY feel is most suitable to work for me! And I am supposed to go along with this, because I am paying out the money for insurance, retirement, pension plan, sick leaves, vacation... Why, again???
Anyone with a brain bigger than a pea knows this isn't marxism. It's not worth my attention and risking derailing my thread over.
Guess Pell grants are socialism too.
Somebody recently had a conversation with me on the board about this and talked how it would be "impossible" ...Obama came out the other day and had some strong language about affirmative action and suggested making it needs based as opposed to race based.
What say ye?
Somebody recently had a conversation with me on the board about this and talked how it would be "impossible" ...
Ah hayul... AHZ, take note.