Obama lied about Libya

C

canceled.2021.1

#AMERICAISDEAD
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._about_libya_doesnt_mean_they_were_false.html

The standard was set by demalquedacrats during the Iraq War. Being wrong about WMD meant the administration lied. Therefore, being wrong about what happened in Benghazi means the administration lied.

I am sure Jello will go diving into Google to try to defend his big eared douchebag kenyan born president, but it is enjoyable watching leftardiots have to eat the bullshit they dished out for years.

What is it they say about Karma?
 
Do you remember the thing robmoney was all upset about the first day of this event?

That obama was apologising to the terrorists.

What was his evidnce "obama" was apologising?


that the embassy released a statement saying they denouced the idiot film in question.


your own clowns "big point" is the evidence of why they thought it was the flim that caused this.

The very victims in this case tried to head off the backlash from falling on them right before the incident.


Think about that one for a minute
 
evince said:
Do you remember the thing robmoney was all upset about the first day of this event?

That obama was apologising to the terrorists.

What was his evidnce "obama" was apologising?


that the embassy released a statement saying they denouced the idiot film in question.


your own clowns "big point" is the evidence of why they thought it was the flim that caused this.

The very victims in this case tried to head off the backlash from falling on them right before the incident.


Think about that one for a minute
Click to expand...

MUST DEFEND OBAMA NO MATTER WHAT

:rofl2:

We get it, you don't care about the truth
 
hazlnut said:
Correction: They weren't 'wrong'. Dickie intentionally had his people in the CIA spread falsified reports. They sold the war based on a lie.

They lied to you, sold you shit. You opened your mouth, licked your lips, and ate their shit.
Click to expand...

Interesting. Surely you have proof of your first statement and can back it up?

Secondly, why didn't OWEdummyfuckercokeaddict prosecute them? Surely those are crimes against our country that would have gotten overwhelming support to prosecute. Have you sent your evidence to the President?

Lastly, did Biden and Hillary "open their mouths, lick their lips and eat their shit"? Because as you so conveniently forget that they voted for the war.

I will wait while this latest beat down washes over you
 
FactsRStubborn said:
MUST DEFEND OBAMA NO MATTER WHAT

:rofl2:

We get it, you don't care about the truth
Click to expand...




If this statement from the embassy was NOT proof that someone could have thought they feared the locals reaction to the stupid piece of crap movie then why was Robmoney SOOOOOO upset about it being an apology from Obama?


You forgot just how stupid it made him look to claim a release by the embassy people themselves who felt they were in danger trying to head off that danger was a MAJOR foriegn policy blunder by Obama?


now that undeniable piece of evidence COULDNT be the basis of why the admin at first thought the embassy was attacked for this reason?


Gee you sure like to jump to conclusions before the facts are in.


That is NOT a good way to run foreign policy and WHY it is unprecidented for a candidate to USE these type of events to gain some cheap political points.


party over country at every turn with you righties
 
evince said:
If this statement from the embassy was NOT proof that someone could have thought they feared the locals reaction to the stupid piece of crap movie then why was Robmoney SOOOOOO upset about it being an apology from Obama?


You forgot just how stupid it made him look to claim a release by the embassy people themselves who felt they were in danger trying to head off that danger was a MAJOR foriegn policy blunder by Obama?


now that undeniable piece of evidence COULDNT be the basis of why the admin at first thought the embassy was attacked for this reason?


Gee you sure like to jump to conclusions before the facts are in.


That is NOT a good way to run foreign policy and WHY it is unprecidented for a candidate to USE these type of events to gain some cheap political points.


party over country at every turn with you righties
Click to expand...

Ambassador dead and your pissed about Romney response instead of anything OWEblahblah did or didn't do to prevent it. Nice
 
what robmoney did was historically unprecidented


He took a foreign policy emergency and bofore all the facts were in he colored in a way for him to gian what he thought were election points.


He took a fluid situation and without regruad to the effects on the lies of other people serving in foreign lands and TRIED to capitalize on it poltically.

NOW you dupes try and say the VERY embassy issuance he USED as proof of obama apologising to the terrorists is meaningless in the issue of why the admin thought the incident was caused by the film.




Now you lied about this evidence already.


Now you will lie about this evidence all over again.


thank you for helping the terrorists tear us appart
 
FactsRStubborn said:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._about_libya_doesnt_mean_they_were_false.html

The standard was set by demalquedacrats during the Iraq War. Being wrong about WMD meant the administration lied. Therefore, being wrong about what happened in Benghazi means the administration lied.

I am sure Jello will go diving into Google to try to defend his big eared douchebag kenyan born president, but it is enjoyable watching leftardiots have to eat the bullshit they dished out for years.

What is it they say about Karma?
Click to expand...

There is a world of difference lad....being wrong and lying are two completely totally different animals....and we all know that.

and if you'd ignore Jello like the rest of us are trying to do , it would help.
 
FactsRStubborn said:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._about_libya_doesnt_mean_they_were_false.html

The standard was set by demalquedacrats during the Iraq War. Being wrong about WMD meant the administration lied. Therefore, being wrong about what happened in Benghazi means the administration lied.

I am sure Jello will go diving into Google to try to defend his big eared douchebag kenyan born president, but it is enjoyable watching leftardiots have to eat the bullshit they dished out for years.

What is it they say about Karma?
Click to expand...


What the Administration, not President Obama, said about Lybia was not an attempt to whip up support for a war that would cost the lives of American Heros. What President Bush said directly was!
 
FactsRStubborn said:
Interesting. Surely you have proof of your first statement and can back it up?

Secondly, why didn't OWEdummyfuckercokeaddict prosecute them? Surely those are crimes against our country that would have gotten overwhelming support to prosecute. Have you sent your evidence to the President?

Lastly, did Biden and Hillary "open their mouths, lick their lips and eat their shit"? Because as you so conveniently forget that they voted for the war.

I will wait while this latest beat down washes over you
Click to expand...

Now Powell Tells Us
excerpts

On Monday, former Secretary of State Colin Powell told me that he and his department's top experts never believed that Iraq posed an imminent nuclear threat, but that the President followed the misleading advice of Vice President Dick Cheney and the CIA in making the claim. Now he tells us.

The harsh truth is that this President cherry-picked the intelligence data in making his case for invading Iraq and deliberately kept the public in the dark as to the countervailing analysis at the highest level of the intelligence community. While the President and his top Cabinet officials were fear-mongering with stark images of a "mushroom cloud" over American cities, the leading experts on nuclear weaponry at the Department of Energy (the agency in charge of the US nuclear-weapons program) and the State Department thought the claim of a near-term Iraqi nuclear threat was absurd.

---

The specter of the Iraqi nuclear threat was primarily based on an already discredited claim that Iraq had purchased aluminum tubes for the purpose of making nuclear weapons. In fact, at the time, the INR wrote in the National Intelligence Estimate that it "accepts the judgment of technical experts at the US Department of Energy (DOE) who have concluded that the tubes Iraq seeks to acquire are poorly suited for use in gas centrifuges to be used for uranium enrichment and finds unpersuasive the arguments advanced by others to make the case that they are intended for that purpose."

The other major evidence President Bush gave Americans for a revitalized Iraq nuclear program, of course, was his 2003 State of the Union claim--later found to be based on forged documents--that a deal had been made to obtain uranium from Niger. This deal was exposed within the Administration as bogus before the President's speech in January by Ambassador Wilson, who traveled to Niger for the CIA. Wilson only went public with his criticisms in an op-ed piece in the New York Times a half year later in response to what he charged were the Administration's continued distortion of the evidence. In excerpts later made available to the public, it is clear that the Niger claim doesn't even appear as a key finding in the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, while the INR dissent in that document dismisses it curtly: "[T]he claims of Iraqi pursuit of natural uranium in Africa are, in INR's assessment highly dubious."

I queried Powell at a reception following a talk he gave in Los Angeles on Monday. Pointing out that the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate showed that his State Department had gotten it right on the nonexistent Iraq nuclear threat, I asked why did the President ignore that wisdom in his stated case for the invasion?

"The CIA was pushing the aluminum tube argument heavily and Cheney went with that instead of what our guys wrote," Powell said. And the Niger reference in Bush's State of the Union speech? "That was a big mistake," he said. "It should never have been in the speech. I didn't need Wilson to tell me that there wasn't a Niger connection. He didn't tell us anything we didn't already know. I never believed it."
http://www.thenation.com/article/now-powell-tells-us
 
evince said:
Do you remember the thing robmoney was all upset about the first day of this event?

That obama was apologising to the terrorists.

What was his evidnce "obama" was apologising?


that the embassy released a statement saying they denouced the idiot film in question.


your own clowns "big point" is the evidence of why they thought it was the flim that caused this.

The very victims in this case tried to head off the backlash from falling on them right before the incident.


Think about that one for a minute
Click to expand...

Obama apoligizing.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...vatives-resurrect-obama-apology-tour-lie.html

the film in question ?....There was no 'film in question' ....that was a lie from day one....those people never even heard of it in Libya....
the first thing Obama did was talk about the US and our big concern that we don't ridicule other religions, and denouncing this film, etc....
Then Hillary did her apology bit....
If you watched O'reilly lately, he been playing the video of both on TV.....undeniable video of both events....
Only a hick would think an apology MUST contain the words, "I'm sorry" .....
 
hazlnut said:
Correction: They weren't 'wrong'. Dickie intentionally had his people in the CIA spread falsified reports. They sold the war based on a lie.

They lied to you, sold you shit. You opened your mouth, licked your lips, and ate their shit.
Click to expand...


Bush don't write the NIE reports.....thats 16 or 14 different agencys that combine intelligence and give the president THEIR conclusion...

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jksonc/docs/nie-iraq-wmd.html

Read it.
 
bravo said:
Obama apoligizing.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...vatives-resurrect-obama-apology-tour-lie.html

the film in question ?....There was no 'film in question' ....that was a lie from day one....those people never even heard of it in Libya....
the first thing Obama did was talk about the US and our big concern that we don't ridicule other religions, and denouncing this film, etc....
Then Hillary did her apology bit....
If you watched O'reilly lately, he been playing the video of both on TV.....undeniable video of both events....
Only a hick would think an apology MUST contain the words, "I'm sorry" .....
Click to expand...





Then why did that embassy feel a need to address the film in a publica release?



That goes against everything you just claimed
 
FactsRStubborn said:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._about_libya_doesnt_mean_they_were_false.html

The standard was set by demalquedacrats during the Iraq War. Being wrong about WMD meant the administration lied. Therefore, being wrong about what happened in Benghazi means the administration lied.

I am sure Jello will go diving into Google to try to defend his big eared douchebag kenyan born president, but it is enjoyable watching leftardiots have to eat the bullshit they dished out for years.

What is it they say about Karma?
Click to expand...

It is one thing to mistakenly relate the details of an on-going event and quite another to draw conclusions and draw up plans/a response. As new information came forward the Obama administration passed the info along.

As to the nonsense about an apology it’s a hell of a lot better to offer an apology based on the wrong evidence compared to starting a war resulting in thousands of deaths and injuries to American citizens.

FactsRStubborn said:
Interesting. Surely you have proof of your first statement and can back it up?

Secondly, why didn't OWEdummyfuckercokeaddict prosecute them? Surely those are crimes against our country that would have gotten overwhelming support to prosecute. Have you sent your evidence to the President?

Lastly, did Biden and Hillary "open their mouths, lick their lips and eat their shit"? Because as you so conveniently forget that they voted for the war.

I will wait while this latest beat down washes over you
Click to expand...

Of course they voted for the war going on the lies that were presented. It’s no different than some people being against ObamaCare going on the lies that were presented. All anyone can do is go on the information they have access to, going on the lies they are presented. However, in the case of the Repubs, it’s quite another thing to deny conflicting information which they did and proceed to start an unnecessary war. Even you should be able to understand the difference.

Read Blackascoal’s message, #12. Do try to learn.
 
apple0154 said:
It is one thing to mistakenly relate the details of an on-going event and quite another to draw conclusions and draw up plans/a response. As new information came forward the Obama administration passed the info along.

As to the nonsense about an apology it’s a hell of a lot better to offer an apology based on the wrong evidence compared to starting a war resulting in thousands of deaths and injuries to American citizens.



Of course they voted for the war going on the lies that were presented. It’s no different than some people being against ObamaCare going on the lies that were presented. All anyone can do is go on the information they have access to, going on the lies they are presented. However, in the case of the Repubs, it’s quite another thing to deny conflicting information which they did and proceed to start an unnecessary war. Even you should be able to understand the difference.

Read Blackascoal’s message, #12. Do try to learn.
Click to expand...

I still come back to the fact that OWEblahblah didn't prosecute anyone based on the lies you claim were told.

Obama lied and our Ambassador died
 
evince said:
Then why did that embassy feel a need to address the film in a publica release?



That goes against everything you just claimed
Click to expand...


The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others.
Click to expand...


Sounds pretty generic to me....no mention of video in particular...it is ambiguous at best....
Has the person responsible for the statement ever explained the reason for the statement...???

Our respect for everyone's religious beliefs is not something new, the Obama admin. has saying this or a variation of it for years...

For the time line of who said what and when..
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/09/12/us/politics/libya-statements.html
 
FactsRStubborn said:
I still come back to the fact that OWEblahblah didn't prosecute anyone based on the lies you claim were told.
Click to expand...

Plausible deniability? Or simply stated they took the info that supported their agenda and dumped the rest.

Obama lied and our Ambassador died
Click to expand...

What lie led to the Ambassador's death? I thought all the nonsense was to do with the stories that came out after his death.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top