Obama stumbles in debate

Topspin

Topspin

Verified User
badly, and Edwards look weak as usual
You'll see Clinton's lead back at old levels in no time.
She dominated.:clink:
 
watch the polls duhla. I watch and analyst were in agreement she dominated. Obama is a speech giver he sucks at debates. He can't think on his feet. He got bood
 
Topspin said:
watch the polls duhla. I watch and analyst were in agreement she dominated. Obama is a speech giver he sucks at debates. He can't think on his feet. He got bood
Click to expand...

Oh, you mean the pundits told you this?

Well, that is even more meaningless, thanks for sharing.
 
I didn't know HillaryGirl was such a pundit groupie.

Hey HG - why do you ignore the pundits when they tell you how divisive Hillary is, and how she'll drive up GOP turnout & cost the Dems Congress?
 
Darla said:
Oh, you mean the pundits told you this?

Well, that is even more meaningless, thanks for sharing.
Click to expand...


Topspin wants hillary because she represent the status quo of world domination through fascist trade and currency policy.
 
Damocles said:
Well, then any of them would do. Except Paul or Kucinich.
Click to expand...

That's too blanket of a statement.

I agree with the general idea that the "viable" candidates are all beholden to the status quo to a degree, but there ARE varying degrees, and the differences are not negligible.

Hillary is off the charts in that regard. Obama, by comparison, represents significant change. Yes, there are certain things he'll do that Hillary would have done, but in general, there is a much better chance of changing direction.

The thought of a Hillary Presidency is very depressing to me. It's just slightly better than re-electing George Bush for another 8 years.
 
Topspin said:
I watched libaral CNN
I supprised none of the turbo libs did :readit:
Click to expand...


Yeah, CNN, that's what I thought.

Here is the CNN post-debate lineup:

1) James Carville - Current Hillary Clinton supporter and former Bill Clinton employee.

2) David Gergen - "Moderate Republican" and Former Clinton employee.

3) J.C. Watts - Republican lunatic


I'm shocked that they said that Clinton won!
 
republicans are even calling Clinton a lock!!!
Does anyone really think Obama or worse Edwards has a real shot.
 
Topspin said:
republicans are even calling Clinton a lock!!!
Does anyone really think Obama or worse Edwards has a real shot.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't put too much stock in that. There is definitely an element of wishful thinking there. The GOP is drooling over the prospect of a Hillary candidacy; it would be like throwing them a life preserver when they're going down for the last time.
 
Dungheap said:
Yeah, CNN, that's what I thought.

Here is the CNN post-debate lineup:

1) James Carville - Current Hillary Clinton supporter and former Bill Clinton employee.

2) David Gergen - "Moderate Republican" and Former Clinton employee.

3) J.C. Watts - Republican lunatic


I'm shocked that they said that Clinton won!
Click to expand...

LOL. Sometimes I wonder if Top isn’t a crash-test dummy who some clever Ford employee trained to type.
 
Onceler said:
That's too blanket of a statement.

I agree with the general idea that the "viable" candidates are all beholden to the status quo to a degree, but there ARE varying degrees, and the differences are not negligible.

Hillary is off the charts in that regard. Obama, by comparison, represents significant change. Yes, there are certain things he'll do that Hillary would have done, but in general, there is a much better chance of changing direction.

The thought of a Hillary Presidency is very depressing to me. It's just slightly better than re-electing George Bush for another 8 years.
Click to expand...
Not change in currency or bank systems. AHZ generalized so much that almost every candidate pretty much fell into the category.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top