I know, I know...this is your candidate isn't it?
![]()
Watermark is that you?
I know, I know...this is your candidate isn't it?
![]()
But we don't know what the involvement of Mexico's Government was and we never will knw what happened, as long as Obama continues to hide his own level of participation.
WHY WON'T OBAMA RELEASE THE RECORDS.
THE PUBLIC HAS A RIGHT TO KNOW.
You just admitted that you think the death of the Border Agent is inconsequential.![]()
Now now. Twisting what I said is not the adult way to do things. I said the death of one agent does not justify opening government secrets and the potential for problems with foreign relations.
What do you think Obama's involvement could have possibly been? Unless you believe he drew up the plans himself and personally supervised the operation what do you want to pin on him?
Hey, Christie, quick question for you.
Q: Is the Constitution irrational?
And basically you feel that his death is less then Obama protecting his involvement in F & F.
As to the rest; we'll never know, unless he releases the information, and the people deserve to know.
Especially since he said he would be transparent, while in office.
I am glad that you finally admitted that all of your twisting of what was said, previously, wasn't very adult of you.![]()
You're not making any sense. It has little to do with Obama and more to do with international relations. Once you grasp that you'll be on your way to understanding.
Transparent? When it was leaked about Iran's computers the Repubs wet themselves in Congress. Think of Jack Nicholson and Tom Cruise.![]()
You're not making any sense. It has little to do with Obama and more to do with international relations. Once you grasp that you'll be on your way to understanding.
Ironic hypocritical post by Bane, will always be ironic and hypocritical.![]()
Watermark is that you?
And basically you feel that his death is less then Obama protecting his involvement in F & F.
As to the rest; we'll never know, unless he releases the information, and the people deserve to know.
Especially since he said he would be transparent, while in office.
I am glad that you finally admitted that all of your twisting of what was said, previously, wasn't very adult of you.![]()
You're not making any sense. It has little to do with Obama and more to do with international relations. Once you grasp that you'll be on your way to understanding.
Transparent? When it was leaked about Iran's computers the Repubs wet themselves in Congress. Think of Jack Nicholson and Tom Cruise.![]()
Yet, mention Valerie Plame and liberals are all about protecting National security, even when nothing on the scale of FF, or the leaks even comes close, when you consider that Plame was not a covert agent.
That is a load of crap. The international relations aspect is already damaged. Mexico already knows the Obama admin smuggled guns into Mexico without informing Mexican authorities,
Good boy! Goebbels would be so proud.
“If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.”
Silly j-mac thinks he still has to carry water for Bush/Cheney all these years later.
Newsflash, imbecile: Plame was covert.
Yes, Valerie Plame Was Covert
Nice try. CBS, and Fitz fell short of their mission to prove that....
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-07-14-cia-wilson_x.htm
Note the date on your story, doofus. Note the date on mine. Ooops. You fucked up. Again.
Sorry, a agent that poses for covers of magazines, and has full blown stories written about her and her hack husband doesn't for a covert agent make....too bad for you.
..her career was already ruined for cheap political gain....too bad for you.
you do recall it was Armitage that gave out the information, right?.....
Yes I do. However, it was made clear in that circle that she was 'fair game'. Hence Novak's outing of her by name in the Washington Post. Armitage merely served the ball; plenty of scumbags on that team - Scooter, Turdblossom, etc. They made sure her identity became well known because they were pissed at Joe.