Of monuments and memory

archives said:
How could anarchy, which basically means no Gov’t, be used as a scale in writing the Constitution when the Constitution established the very framework of Gov’t?

By the way, neither libertarianism nor anarchy were political thoughts in the 18th Century, if anything, the social democracy of Locke guided the Founders thoughts
Click to expand...

the reason libertarian or anarchy wasnt used is because in europe those people were killed before their message could get out, and the big reason we rejected their rule,,,
 
blades said:
liberalism is a word stolen by progressives to corrupt the meaning and hide their true intent,,,
Click to expand...

Did you know that a large and dominant segment of the Progressive Movement was in fact rural conservatives, you keep throwing around terms that reflect you have little understanding of what they mean
 
blades said:
the reason libertarian or anarchy wasnt used is because in europe those people were killed before their message could get out, and the big reason we rejected their rule,,,
Click to expand...

No, it is because neither ideology didn’t exist at the time, how could it when everyone was just emerging from the Age of Absolutism
 
archives said:
Did you know that a large and dominant segment of the Progressive Movement was in fact rural conservatives, you keep throwing around terms that reflect you have little understanding of what they mean
Click to expand...

prove that, I think youre confusing progress with progressiveism,,,

everybody tries to progress in life, but progressives are communist minded with their direction,,,just look at their origins in the fabian socialist society,,,
 
blades said:
prove that, I think youre confusing progress with progressiveism,,,

everybody tries to progress in life, but progressives are communist minded with their direction,,,just look at their origins in the fabian socialist society,,,
Click to expand...

Communism is dead. Come into the 21st century.
 
guno said:
Leaving aside the fact that fascism is almost exclusively a far-right philosophy that exalts the nation over the individual and minorities, and is exemplified by autocracy and dictatorship, his charge is a signal that his campaign for re-election will be another torrent of divisiveness.

Trump and most of his supporters, and Republican candidates in general, are fully aware that their support mostly comes from what we might charitably call a remnant “Silent Majority” that is white, older, male, and fearful that their political and cultural power is threatened by the demographic shift toward people of color and generally more liberal youth. A blitz of propaganda from the right that couches the conflation of “cancel culture,” Confederate statue removal, and those Trump called “the radical left, the Marxists, the anarchists, the agitators, the looters” will seek to drive Republican turnout.


The philosopher Susan Neiman herself has admitted that her own understanding of terror and suppression waged against Black Americans after the Civil War was sadly incomplete until recently, and that many Americans are ignorant of its cause. She has written about our own lack of knowledge in her book “Learning from the Germans” in which she compares the proactive actions Germany has taken to confront, atone for, and make at least partial restitution for the horror of the Holocaust, with our spotty record of education and understanding of our history.

Confronting the need to remove these statues from places of honor should also force us to confront our long history of racism and suppression of Black and native peoples, and reflect on the best way to educate ourselves in the full, proud, but frequently flawed history of the USA.





https://www.metrowestdailynews.com/opinion/20200711/column-of-monuments-and-memory
Click to expand...

fascism is corporatism. and now it's mostly internationalist fascism that threatens humanity.

public private partnership is textbook fascism.

guno sucks at thinking.
 
blades said:
prove that, I think youre confusing progress with progressiveism,,,

everybody tries to progress in life, but progressives are communist minded with their direction,,,just look at their origins in the fabian socialist society,,,
Click to expand...

Incorrect, if you look at the support of progressivism and populism of the early twenty Century you’d find that they are the same segments that supported McCarthy in the 1950’s, and last I knew, he wasn’t appealing to a communist minded populace
 
guno said:
The cry of the dying uneducated demographic -------------the radical left, the Marxists, the anarchists, the agitators, the looters,
blm.
Click to expand...

actually most high income old people like china and globalism because internationalist fascism has been incentivized by totalitarians, and they dont give a fuck about the future.
 
archives said:
Incorrect, if you look at the support of progressivism and populism of the early twenty Century you’d find that they are the same segments that supported McCarthy in the 1950’s, and last I knew, he wasn’t appealing to a communist minded populace
Click to expand...

so you cant prove it,,,

thats OK I know the truth youre trying to hide,,,
 
archives said:
Incorrect, if you look at the support of progressivism and populism of the early twenty Century you’d find that they are the same segments that supported McCarthy in the 1950’s, and last I knew, he wasn’t appealing to a communist minded populace
Click to expand...

you're looking at segments, not ideologies. that's the problem with identity politics, it's retarded.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top