Offensive black face?

Ain't it amazing how a disease can turn a black person white and even make their features look more "white folk like?" Believe as you will friend, I personally am more than skeptical!!!

It's not a question of believing, it's a question of the truth. There's just no evidence that I can see of Jackson trying to be white. He certainly never tried to distance himself from the black community. Entertainers get plastic surgery all the time. It's medically verified he did have the skin condition vitiligo, and was using a prescription treatment for it. Not sure why you are so desperate to turn it into someing else.
 
When I ask a question that is inconvenient for lefties, I like to try to predict which specific evasion technique they will likely use. I know they are going to dodge, divert, invert, ignore, redefine, or otherwise evade answering with an answer that demonstrates that they have read and understand the opening post, so I like to try and guess which one they will use.

There is no good reason why it is only offensive for whites to where blackface while blacks are free to wear whiteface, and there is no good reason why my spellchecker underlines whiteface in red but does not underline blackface. Lefties cannot provide a good reason for this, so they will evade answering.

One race was discriminated against. The other was not. If you can scrape up a oddity of white face, that means nothing. White people are not being ridiculed with it. It is surely not a race baiting insult, like your threads are, and whites wearing blackface is. The list of whites wearing insulting black face is long and goes through American history. It is a sterotype and cartoonish.
 
If you can scrape up a oddity of white face, that means nothing. White people are not being ridiculed with it.

Eddie Murphy is a comedian by trade. He ridiculed white people.

You have failed to identify why it is ok for other races to wear whiteface, but not ok ok for whites to wear blackface.
 
It's not a question of believing, it's a question of the truth. There's just no evidence that I can see of Jackson trying to be white. He certainly never tried to distance himself from the black community. Entertainers get plastic surgery all the time. It's medically verified he did have the skin condition vitiligo, and was using a prescription treatment for it. Not sure why you are so desperate to turn it into someing else.

As I said friend believe as you will, I'm more than skeptical!!!
 
If it’s sooooo highly offensive for white folks to put on black face when they’re 20, then why wasn’t it sooooo highly offensive when Michael Jackson put on white face when he was 20?

Evidently you do not know the history of blackface

you don't get to define what is offensive to minorities, those days are coming to an end where everything is views by white colored glasses
 
Evidently you do not know the history of blackface

you don't get to define what is offensive to minorities, those days are coming to an end where everything is views by white colored glasses

It's easy. To Democrats, someone innocently dressing in blackface years ago is bad but electing someone for 60 years that was a leader in the Klan is perfectly OK.
 
One race was discriminated against. The other was not. If you can scrape up a oddity of white face, that means nothing. White people are not being ridiculed with it. It is surely not a race baiting insult, like your threads are, and whites wearing blackface is. The list of whites wearing insulting black face is long and goes through American history. It is a sterotype and cartoonish.

Like Al Jolson blacking his face because he admired the blacks singing talents and wanted to emulate them? Black face can be exhibited for several reasons. to humiliate, to entertain or to just make a harmless joke. Ain't it just curious how blacks can call each other niggers make black jokes and white jokes before black and white audiences and no outrage is ever the case? How about white "EQUALITY?" Better yet how about some honesty? How about we tell the truth and reveal that the fake outrage of the white left is simply more of the left's "negro scam" to keep the blacks on the Democrat plantation and voting Democrat by convincing them that the "WHITE RIGHT" have made victims of them?????
 
One race was discriminated against. The other was not. If you can scrape up a oddity of white face, that means nothing. White people are not being ridiculed with it. It is surely not a race baiting insult, like your threads are, and whites wearing blackface is. The list of whites wearing insulting black face is long and goes through American history. It is a sterotype and cartoonish.

Like Al Jolson blacking his face because he admired the blacks singing talents and wanted to emulate them? Black face can be exhibited for several reasons. to humiliate, to entertain or to just make a harmless joke. Ain't it just curious how blacks can call each other niggers make black jokes and white jokes before black and white audiences and no outrage is ever the case? How about white "EQUALITY?" Better yet how about some honesty? How about we tell the truth and reveal that the fake outrage of the white left is simply more of the left's "negro scam" to keep the blacks on the Democrat plantation and voting Democrat by convincing them that the "WHITE RIGHT" have made victims of them?????
 
Like Al Jolson blacking his face because he admired the blacks singing talents and wanted to emulate them? Black face can be exhibited for several reasons. to humiliate, to entertain or to just make a harmless joke. Ain't it just curious how blacks can call each other niggers make black jokes and white jokes before black and white audiences and no outrage is ever the case? How about white "EQUALITY?" Better yet how about some honesty? How about we tell the truth and reveal that the fake outrage of the white left is simply more of the left's "negro scam" to keep the blacks on the Democrat plantation and voting Democrat by convincing them that the "WHITE RIGHT" have made victims of them?????

I'm curious how Democrats can elect someone for 60 years that was a member of the Klan and consider it OK yet chastise those that innocently dressed in blackface years ago.
 
Eddie Murphy is a comedian by trade. He ridiculed white people.

You have failed to identify why it is ok for other races to wear whiteface, but not ok ok for whites to wear blackface.

He ridiculed blacks too. That is his act and he is not a leader of any organization and speaks for no one. Murphy did not wear white face. Blacks do not do that. Michael Jacson also was a nutcase and was not racially motivated.
 
Like Al Jolson blacking his face because he admired the blacks singing talents and wanted to emulate them? Black face can be exhibited for several reasons. to humiliate, to entertain or to just make a harmless joke. Ain't it just curious how blacks can call each other niggers make black jokes and white jokes before black and white audiences and no outrage is ever the case? How about white "EQUALITY?" Better yet how about some honesty? How about we tell the truth and reveal that the fake outrage of the white left is simply more of the left's "negro scam" to keep the blacks on the Democrat plantation and voting Democrat by convincing them that the "WHITE RIGHT" have made victims of them?????

Wrong as usual. Jolson did it because black people were not permitted to act in most of vauldville and movies. It was not a paeon of respect and admiration. It was repression and discrimination. No blacks were allowed.
You are pulling things out of your ass based on nothing. You are wrong.
You are really confused and working with no knowledge. It shows.
 
I'm curious how Democrats can elect someone for 60 years that was a member of the Klan and consider it OK yet chastise those that innocently dressed in blackface years ago.

There's no figuring the left, they dance to a different drummer in crazyville.
 
Wrong as usual. Jolson did it because black people were not permitted to act in most of vauldville and movies. It was not a paeon of respect and admiration. It was repression and discrimination. No blacks were allowed.
You are pulling things out of your ass based on nothing. You are wrong.
You are really confused and working with no knowledge. It shows.

And Jolson performed FOR THEM, dressed and blackened like them and crooned their sorrowful beautiful songs FOR THEM. MAMMY!!!!! If he was insulting blacks, only democrats knew it or pretended in their own racist heads he was doing it!!!
 
They'll justify their support for Byrd by saying "he apologized".

Democrats were and still are the party of slavery. The only difference is they've figured out how to make their slaves love them. They blame Righty Whitey for the black condition, get elected by the blacks to the Big city governments and give their slaves just enough subsistence of other people's money to keep them reliant, low on incentive, and in the ghetto plantation slave quarters voting for their Democrat slave masters. They also promote abortions for them to eventually erase them from human existence.
 
"Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

Robo's tagline is among the more stupid lines on this website.

In a democratic republic, government is that which we do collectively because it's more efficient than doing individually.
All of government, in other words, is SOCIALISM.
No socialism = anarchy.

Socialism is a scary word only to the illiterates who don't understand what it means.

So let's stop talking about red herring issues like Halloween makeup, tasteful or otherwise.

America is at such a low point in her history that she requires a social revolution just to remain relevant.

One of the first thing we must do is exponentially multiply our commitment to education.

Undereducated Americans have very nearly succeeded in bringing us down permanently. We don't have a lot of time.
 
"Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

Robo's tagline is among the more stupid lines on this website.

In a democratic republic, government is that which we do collectively because it's more efficient than doing individually.
All of government, in other words, is SOCIALISM.
No socialism = anarchy.

Socialism is a scary word only to the illiterates who don't understand what it means.

So let's stop talking about red herring issues like Halloween makeup, tasteful or otherwise.

America is at such a low point in her history that she requires a social revolution just to remain relevant.

One of the first thing we must do is exponentially multiply our commitment to education.

Undereducated Americans have very nearly succeeded in bringing us down permanently. We don't have a lot of time.

Government IS a force of nature, created by humans who are also a force of nature. It is in part a triumph over tribalism and barbarianism. You prefer anarchy?
 
Democrats were and still are the party of slavery. The only difference is they've figured out how to make their slaves love them. They blame Righty Whitey for the black condition, get elected by the blacks to the Big city governments and give their slaves just enough subsistence of other people's money to keep them reliant, low on incentive, and in the ghetto plantation slave quarters voting for their Democrat slave masters. They also promote abortions for them to eventually erase them from human existence.

They've figured out how to get their "slaves" to be slaves voluntarily.

All those years on the Democrat plantation and look how it's worked out for the blacks. An over 70% bastard birth rate, a dropout rate higher than any group, high poverty level, 1 in every 3 1/2 use food stamps, and an average 85 IQ. Unless white people are impregnating all those black females, dropping out on behalf of blacks, signing blacks up for food stamps, or taking IQ tests for them, white people aren't to blame for any of it. It's an excuse.
 
It's a good thing we have banjofuck to give us the white trash perspective.

As a Euro American myself, is it necessary to clarify that shitstains like he are not representing the consensus Euro American perspective?
 
Back
Top