Oh, oh, it’s all Soros fault again

Soros pours $125M into super PAC ahead of midterms
The mammoth donation is fueling investment in Democratic political groups and races from Senate to secretary of state around the country.

I’m sure he gives millions to Democrats then gives millions to conservative DA’s and prosecutors.

Sure he does.

Irrelevant

How daft are are you?

Not about who Soros supports, but Trump and the GOP claim that Bragg’s investigation is politically motivated cause it is inspired by Soros

And as I said, Richard Uihlein contributed close to 100 million to GOP candidates, does that mean any investigation conducted by a GOP DA somwhere is Uihlein’s work?
 
Which means Trump and the GOP are lying, Bragg’s investigation isn’t the work of Soros


Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
George Soros spent $40M getting lefty district attorneys, officials elected all over the country.
nypost.com

Your response resembles something out of the Twilight Zone, Anchovies.
 
Irrelevant

How daft are are you?

Not about who Soros supports, but Trump and the GOP claim that Bragg’s investigation is politically motivated cause it is inspired by Soros

And as I said, Richard Uihlein contributed close to 100 million to GOP candidates, does that mean any investigation conducted by a GOP DA somwhere is Uihlein’s work?

Soros funded Bragg’s election...lose the daft mierda, you are not on high moral ground to call anyone daft.
 
George Soros Pledges to Keep Funding Pro-Criminal, Anti-Police Prosecutors

By Steve Pomper

“Bond-villain” George Soros is not sorry, or even having second thoughts, about funding ultra-leftist prosecutors like Alvin Bragg (New York City), Kim Foxx (Chicago), Larry Krasner (Philadelphia), and George Gascon (Los Angeles) for all the devastation they’ve inflicted on American communities. Instead, according to the New York Post, Soros “vows he won’t stop backing woke DAs despite urban crime spikes.”

The 91-year-old native Hungarian recently published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. In it he argued the “soft-on-crime district attorneys” he’s backed to the tune of millions of dollars are making the criminal justice system “more effective and just….” Soros said he has no intentions of pulling his support from them.
https://nationalpolice.org/george-s...funding-pro-criminal-anti-police-prosecutors/

Soros himself even did an op-Ed in the WSJ defending his support for D.A.s that don’t prosecute violent criminals.
https://www.google.com/search?q=sor...CYAQCgAQHIAQfAAQE&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp

Not that I care. Who am I to judge what type of crime infested cesspool you prefer? To each their own.
Live and let live as long as it doesn’t harm me.

Always interesting how someone jumps in without at least reviewing some of the prior posts

Once again, Soros, as one of multiple donors, contributes unearmarked funds to a PAC that supports numerous political candidates does not prove Soros is the main behind the curtain in Bragg’s investigation

And by the way, you are quoting from an opinion piece published by Murdoch
Really not that difficult
 
Irrelevant

How daft are are you?

Not about who Soros supports, but Trump and the GOP claim that Bragg’s investigation is politically motivated cause it is inspired by Soros

And as I said, Richard Uihlein contributed close to 100 million to GOP candidates, does that mean any investigation conducted by a GOP DA somwhere is Uihlein’s work?

If the GOP candidate was funded by the mega-doner, Uihlein and he was elected DA, yes, it would be suspect.

A conservative DA would want thugs prosecuted, a good thing, right, Anchovies.
 
he hates traditional American values. Sheldon Adelson donated more money - and the right didn't hate him - so much for your retarded theory

Why would the right hate Adelosn?

And now left leaning causes hate America? If the Founding Fathers believed that we would still be part of the British Commonwealth today
 
George Soros Pledges to Keep Funding Pro-Criminal, Anti-Police Prosecutors

By Steve Pomper

“Bond-villain” George Soros is not sorry, or even having second thoughts, about funding ultra-leftist prosecutors like Alvin Bragg (New York City), Kim Foxx (Chicago), Larry Krasner (Philadelphia), and George Gascon (Los Angeles) for all the devastation they’ve inflicted on American communities. Instead, according to the New York Post, Soros “vows he won’t stop backing woke DAs despite urban crime spikes.”

The 91-year-old native Hungarian recently published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. In it he argued the “soft-on-crime district attorneys” he’s backed to the tune of millions of dollars are making the criminal justice system “more effective and just….” Soros said he has no intentions of pulling his support from them.
https://nationalpolice.org/george-s...funding-pro-criminal-anti-police-prosecutors/

Soros himself even did an op-Ed in the WSJ defending his support for D.A.s that don’t prosecute violent criminals.
https://www.google.com/search?q=sor...CYAQCgAQHIAQfAAQE&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp

Not that I care. Who am I to judge what type of crime infested cesspool you prefer? To each their own.
Live and let live as long as it doesn’t harm me.

Indeed.

Thanks.

Anchovies seems to think this isn’t relevant.

Poor Anchovies.
 
Always interesting how someone jumps in without at least reviewing some of the prior posts

Once again, Soros, as one of multiple donors, contributes unearmarked funds to a PAC that supports numerous political candidates does not prove Soros is the main behind the curtain in Bragg’s investigation
Never said that. Just stating what you already know and support. D.A.'s that are beyond soft on violent crime. They turn a blind eye to it. Like I said, if that's what you support, I don't care. As long as it doesn't hurt me. I don't venture in to those cesspools of cities anymore.
And by the way, you are quoting from an opinion piece published by Murdoch
Really not that difficult
The opinion piece in the WSJ was written by Soros himself! :palm:
 
If the GOP candidate was funded by the mega-doner, Uihlein and he was elected DA, yes, it would be suspect.

A conservative DA would want thugs prosecuted, a good thing, right, Anchovies.

Suspect that Uihlein is behind the investigation? For real?

You do realize that Uihlein probably doesn’t even know nor has personally met the vast majority of the candidates the PAC he help supported worked for let alone he inspired their investigations
 
Suspect that Uihlein is behind the investigation? For real?

You do realize that Uihlein probably doesn’t even know nor has personally met the vast majority of the candidates the PAC he help supported worked for let alone he inspired their investigations

Anchovies, you have a penchant for posting quotes that were not posted.

Work on this problem, Anchovies.
 
Never said that. Just stating what you already know and support. D.A.'s that are beyond soft on violent crime. They turn a blind eye to it. Like I said, if that's what you support, I don't care. As long as it doesn't hurt me. I don't venture in to those cesspools of cities anymore.
The opinion piece in the WSJ was written by Soros himself! :palm:

But the tread is over Trump and the GOP claiming Soros is behind the Bragg investigation because he supposedly directly contributed to Bragg’s election

And the WSJ/Soros piece is from 2022, this investigation began back in 2019
 
Exactly what you said, “yes it would be suspect”

If the GOP candidate was funded by the mega-doner, Uihlein and he was elected DA, yes, it would be suspect.

A conservative DA would want thugs prosecuted, a good thing, right, Anchovies.

Note the second sentence, Anchovies.

The DA in NY is not a conservative and links have already been posted showing Bragg is soft on crime.
 
Back
Top