Oh, oh, Trump all bent out of shape again

And I posted the actual tape back on the first page which included word for word exactly what Reagan said in his address and which was on Ontario’s TV ad
Ontario's TV ad dishonestly left out the context you brainless dumb hack. :palm:

They also used it without permission you brainless dumb hack.

They're also trying to influence a Supreme Court case you brainless dumb hack.

No wonder you voted for an idiot like Kamala. You're a brainless dumb hack.
 
And the actual ad:

View: https://youtu.be/pABUi669v3g?si=gCEF9643uiYJs72-


Trump is all pissed off because they used the actual words of a Republican Icon to discredit Trump
Here's the real irony of Canada's trolling, they use Tariffs to protect their own industry from American goods.

Morons like you don't comprehend the difference between FAIR trade equals FREE trade. When other countries have tariffs against our products, it isn't FAIR or FREE. Dumbass. :palm:
 
Ontario's TV ad dishonestly left out the context you brainless dumb hack. :palm:

They also used it without permission you brainless dumb hack.

They're also trying to influence a Supreme Court case you brainless dumb hack.

No wonder you voted for an idiot like Kamala. You're a brainless dumb hack.
Kinda like Fox and 99% of your propaganda sources does 24/7, but hey didn’t, they didn’t show the entire tape, but they quoted Reagan word for word on opinions he expressed throughout his career

Why does one have to obtain permission to copy something one can access easily off the internet?

And I love to see how a TV ad from a province in Canada was trying to influence the Supreme Court, it could be pretty funny. Did you think the Justices Trump bought or the other two Neanderthals were going to be swayed by a Canadian TV ad
 
Kinda like Fox and 99% of your propaganda sources does 24/7, but hey didn’t, they didn’t show the entire tape, but they quoted Reagan word for word on opinions he expressed throughout his career

Why does one have to obtain permission to copy something one can access easily off the internet?

And I love to see how a TV ad from a province in Canada was trying to influence the Supreme Court, it could be pretty funny. Did you think the Justices Trump bought or the other two Neanderthals were going to be swayed by a Canadian TV ad
Reagans speech was what is called a "Presidential broadcast address to the nation".

it is, by design, completely public and thus there is no 'ownership restriction' that can be imposed on it any more than you speaking in a public square or to a rally could then try to claim control and restrict people from broadcasting what you say.

So for this issue, when speaking with people like @Truth Detector you have to begin with 1st Principles which tell you magats are stupid. Due to that stupidity they will continue to argue that a designed public address retains control over the content spoken. It does not but again, 1st Principles... they are stupid.
 
Kinda like Fox and 99% of your propaganda sources does 24/7,

There you go again, lying and flailing like a brainless dumbfuck. :palm:

but hey didn’t, they didn’t show the entire tape, but they quoted Reagan word for word on opinions he expressed throughout his career

It was edited and used to make an argument Reagan never made and without permission from the Reagan library. DUH!

Why does one have to obtain permission to copy something one can access easily off the internet?

Because it is protected copyright dumbass.

And I love to see how a TV ad from a province in Canada was trying to influence the Supreme Court, it could be pretty funny.

Because you aren't informed and get all your information from MSNBC, it was an attempt to influence the court which is soon going to be hearing cases on Trumps ability to use Tariffs to shape policy dumbass.

Did you think the Justices Trump bought or the other two Neanderthals were going to be swayed by a Canadian TV ad

Absurdity; the last desperate refuge for the ignorant, the dishonest and the stupid when they know they have lost an argument.
 
Reagans speech was what is called a "Presidential broadcast address to the nation".

it is, by design, completely public and thus there is no 'ownership restriction' that can be imposed on it any more than you speaking in a public square or to a rally could then try to claim control and restrict people from broadcasting what you say.

So for this issue, when speaking with people like @Truth Detector you have to begin with 1st Principles which tell you magats are stupid. Due to that stupidity they will continue to argue that a designed public address retains control over the content spoken. It does not but again, 1st Principles... they are stupid.
It's not about ownership. It's about editing his comments to mean something that he never intended. DUH!
 
Back
Top