Is this not absolutely hilarious? I mean, seriously, if you'd escaped a murder rap by the skin of your teeth, wouldn't you lay low - especially since you're still in the spotlight? Robbing someone at gun point would be the last thing on my to do list.
What a tard.
I figure he's in his cell right now upset that he didn't think to slaughter everybody in the room, rub their DNA all over himself, then go do some chip shots in the back yard.Is this not absolutely hilarious? I mean, seriously, if you'd escaped a murder rap by the skin of your teeth, wouldn't you lay low - especially since you're still in the spotlight? Robbing someone at gun point would be the last thing on my to do list.
What a tard.
I figure he's in his cell right now upset that he didn't think to slaughter everybody in the room, rub their DNA all over himself, then go do some chip shots in the back yard.
I really hope that the media is going to shut up about this "story" because that is all I have seen on the "news" since it broke. It's really disgusting. Excuse me, but there is other stuff going on, far more important and impacting many lives.
I really hope that the media is going to shut up about this "story" because that is all I have seen on the "news" since it broke. It's really disgusting. Excuse me, but there is other stuff going on, far more important and impacting many lives.
LOL.
He better hope the DA or arresting officer turns out to be a raving racist.
I think OJ has searched at least half the golf courses in the US for the killer.
I think OJ has searched at least half the golf courses in the US for the killer.
Anyway, of course The Juice is the latest water cooler talk at my office because we're like so intellectual.
What do you guys think: is it necessarily fair to have someone responsible for deaths financially when they've been aquitted criminally. The DA wasn't able to prove he had anything to do with the murders in a court of law.
Actually, that's a good question. My initial reaction is, no.
Anyway, of course The Juice is the latest water cooler talk at my office because we're like so intellectual.
What do you guys think: is it necessarily fair to have someone responsible for deaths financially when they've been aquitted criminally. The DA wasn't able to prove he had anything to do with the murders in a court of law.
One is a "preponderance of evidence" the other "beyond reasonable doubt". So, yes.I'm no lawyer, so I'd be pretending if I knew the answer to that. The only thing I ever heard that is relevant, is that the standards of proof of guilt is far lower in a civil trial, than a criminal one.
What in the world are you babbling about again? Nevermind. I don't care. continue your nonsensical dribble.
Ms.Queen of the Projects...
Ms.Queen of the Projects...I will be blunt rather than simply using humor...