Oklahoma writes bible requirements so that only Trumps bible will meet them

That's the point. There never was any "crime."

Trump was prosecuted for challenging the power of the democrat party. As @Kafka pointed out, Trump engaged in a perfectly legal "standard and common business practice." What Garland, Bragg, and Merchan did is seditious conspiracy to overthrow a national election.

God it's like talking to a toddler. You are incapable of understanding even the most SIMPLE concepts.

SOME NDA'S ARE ILLEGAL.

SOME NDA'S ARE LEGAL

ERGO: NOT ALL NDA'S ARE ILLEGAL.

You seem flummoxed by even the most simple concept. You must a special needs person.
 
I work with NDA's all the time.

You've said that - so you know full well that what Garland, Bragg, and Merchan charged Trump with is illegitimate and purely meant to corrupt a presidential election - to "destroy democracy."

Every week. Several NDA's. NDA's are not ALL illegal. Only SOME applications of NDAs are illegal.

You're spinning in your desperation to get out of the corner you painted yourself into.
 
God it's like talking to a toddler. You are incapable of understanding even the most SIMPLE concepts.

SOME NDA'S ARE ILLEGAL.

SOME NDA'S ARE LEGAL

ERGO: NOT ALL NDA'S ARE ILLEGAL.

You seem flummoxed by even the most simple concept. You must a special needs person.

You're melting down Comrade.

You painted yourself into a corner. Admit that what your party did is seditious conspiracy to destroy democracy, and move on.
 
We call it "Biddin' fer Bibles" wherein people of good faith who worship the ONE AND TRUE GOD, MAMMON, can make some money off of people's religious fervor and need to appear pious.

Bringing in the Sheaves, Bringing in the Sheaves....
I just call it more lib'rul lies abouut Trump.......you idiots are so fucking transparent........
 
You're melting down Comrade.

You painted yourself into a corner. Admit that what your party did is seditious conspiracy to destroy democracy, and move on.

I can understand why you are voting for Trump. Your job is pretty low level if you've never heard of a legal NDA, so you MIGHT be one of the people whose job will be taken by a non-english speaking illegal immigrant.
 
I can understand why you are voting for Trump. Your job is pretty low level if you've never heard of a legal NDA, so you MIGHT be one of the people whose job will be taken by a non-english speaking illegal immigrant.

Every Trumper is a marine veteran and a brilliant businessman or doctor or lawyer. Problem is, they start posting and reveal the lie. A doctor who can’t spell HIPAA and posts PHI about a relative they supposedly treated. A lawyer who knows nothing about business law. A captain of industry who claims he made a ‘private deal’ to be repaid his seed money when the company was sold. A business owner that doesn’t know what income is subject to social security withholding. And finally our friend here who has a doctorate in logistics but thinks NDAs are illegal. Like their Furher they are compulsive liars that don’t demonstrate even a basic understanding of the profession they claim to have expertise in. Funny if it wasn’t so pathetic.
 
Every Trumper is a marine veteran and a brilliant businessman or doctor or lawyer. Problem is, they start posting and reveal the lie. A doctor who can’t spell HIPAA and posts PHI about a relative they supposedly treated. A lawyer who knows nothing about business law. A captain of industry who claims he made a ‘private deal’ to be repaid his seed money when the company was sold. A business owner that doesn’t know what income is subject to social security withholding. And finally our friend here who has a doctorate in logistics but thinks NDAs are illegal. Like their Furher they are compulsive liars that don’t demonstrate even a basic understanding of the profession they claim to have expertise in. Funny if it wasn’t so pathetic.
Don't forget to include yourself Mr. Economist.
 
Don't forget to include yourself Mr. Economist.

I’m not included. I don’t lie. My posts reflect my level of knowledge about the claims I make. People like those named in my post assume I lack knowledge so they try to bullshit their way through. I don’t have that problem. I don’t claim I was a navy seal. I don’t claim to have a doctor’s degree. I don’t claim knowledge about a subject that I don’t have. I can talk the talk. I don't claim my financial advisor guarantees a ten percent return. I don't claim that I own a business and don't understand how I am compensated. I don't claim that Medicare Advantage is paid for entirely by member premiums. That demonstrates that the person is lying. See how that works?
 
I’m not included. I don’t lie. My posts reflect my level of knowledge about the claims I make. People like those named in my post assume I lack knowledge so they try to bullshit their way through. I don’t have that problem. I don’t claim I was a navy seal. I don’t claim to have a doctor’s degree. I don’t claim knowledge about a subject that I don’t have. I can talk the talk. I don't claim my financial advisor guarantees a ten percent return. I don't claim that I own a business and don't understand how I am compensated. I don't claim that Medicare Advantage is paid for entirely by member premiums. That demonstrates that the person is lying. See how that works?
Stop lying, Concarty,

My financial advisor accepts clients with a minimum of 1 million dollars and if returns are not 10% or more, his fee is reduced.

He guarantees nothing.

Have someone in your household explain this to you…and about private agreements between family members that were made years before a sale. The SEC is not involved.

I believe that you have exposed yourself to be an Uber Eats driver with an Uber Eats knowledge of business.

Of course you are “rich” and an economist.
 
Stop lying, Concarty,

My financial advisor accepts clients with a minimum of 1 million dollars and if returns are not 10% or more, his fee is reduced.

He guarantees nothing.

Have someone in your household explain this to you…and about private agreements between family members that were made years before a sale. The SEC is not involved.

I believe that you have exposed yourself to be an Uber Eats driver with an Uber Eats knowledge of business.

Of course you are “rich” and an economist.

The IRS is sure as fuck involved pal. What you described is pure, unadulterated bullshit. The SEC would only be involved if the company was publicly held. You didn't even know that. LOL at you. And your claim about your financial advisor is bullshit as well. You might be able to fool most of these rubes, but you do not fool me. 10K is 1 percent of a million dollars. There is not a financial advisor in the history of the world that would guarantee a 10% return and ask for less than 1% as a fee. In fact, no reputable financial advisor would make such a guarantee. It is bullshit. Laughable. A complete fucking joke, and you are the punchline.

You cannot have a private agreement that cuts outs the shareholders. Period, full stop. Those transactions must be executed in accordance with the laws governing corporations. A side deal that you describe does not happen unless someone is trying to evade taxes. The way such a transaction works IN ALL CASES is that you provide seed money in return for partial ownership of the company. Any other agreement is illegal. You are such a fucking poser. Leading me to believe the entire thing is a figment of your imagination. You should really have just shut up while you were ahead. But you didn't, and I am smarter than you by degrees (pun intended).

You are a liar. No surprise there. You worship a compulsive liar. Speaks volumes about you.

I never claimed to be an economist. I have a masters in economics. You have a degree from a cracker jack box.
 
He’s “rich” too, from his Uber Eat’s salary.

Uber Eats does not pay a salary. I am rich because I actually know how to invest, as opposed to you, who didn't even do your google research welll enough to fool an uber eats driver. How embarrassing for you, frat boy. I'll bet the fellas down at the club would think you're a clown.
 
The IRS is sure as fuck involved pal. What you described is pure, unadulterated bullshit. The SEC would only be involved if the company was publicly held. You didn't even know that. LOL at you. And your claim about your financial advisor is bullshit as well. You might be able to fool most of these rubes, but you do not fool me. 10K is 1 percent of a million dollars. There is not a financial advisor in the history of the world that would guarantee a 10% return and ask for less than 1% as a fee. In fact, no reputable financial advisor would make such a guarantee. It is bullshit. Laughable. A complete fucking joke, and you are the punchline.

You cannot have a private agreement that cuts outs the shareholders. Period, full stop. Those transactions must be executed in accordance with the laws governing corporations. A side deal that you describe does not happen unless someone is trying to evade taxes. The way such a transaction works IN ALL CASES is that you provide seed money in return for partial ownership of the company. Any other agreement is illegal. You are such a fucking poser. Leading me to believe the entire thing is a figment of your imagination. You should really have just shut up while you were ahead. But you didn't, and I am smarter than you by degrees (pun intended).

You are a liar. No surprise there. You worship a compulsive liar. Speaks volumes about you.

I never claimed to be an economist. I have a masters in economics. You have a degree from a cracker jack box.
One hundred percent wrong,

Were you able to have a family member explain your mistakes?

You still haven’t posted the laws or regulations regarding private agreements, Concarty, decades before a sale, Concarty.

After a sale is consummated, the profits and the distributions are private, except of course the taxes…which were paid. You would think that a “rich economist” would know that.

Are you doing your Uber Eats route today?

If you are rich, why did you retire and then work for Uber Eats, Concarty?
 
Last edited:
One hundred percent wrong,

Were you able to have a family member explain your mistakes?

You still haven’t posted the laws or regulations regarding private agreements, Concarty, decades before a sale, Concarty.

Are you doing your Uber Eats route today?

If you are rich, why did you retire and then work for Uber Eats, Concarty?

Nope. 100% right. Sorry, you didn't know enough to fool me, frat boy. Not even close. When you lied about something as simple as modifying your post to correct a typo, it was obvious that you were a compulsive liar. You are simply confirming what I already knew. Your weird obsession with me is a bit disturbing. Your constant need to be better than me at everything is odd. It's okay, Winthrop, I'm sure you are better at drinking brandy and smoking cigars. And you certainly are better at being a pompous ass and an insufferable prick. You'll just need to be comforted with the idea that in every other way I am your superior. Would you mind typing 'Uber Eats' again? We're playing a drinking game here. Thanks.
 
Nope. 100% right. Sorry, you didn't know enough to fool me, frat boy. Not even close. When you lied about something as simple as modifying your post to correct a typo, it was obvious that you were a compulsive liar. You are simply confirming what I already knew. Your weird obsession with me is a bit disturbing. Your constant need to be better than me at everything is odd. It's okay, Winthrop, I'm sure you are better at drinking brandy and smoking cigars. And you certainly are better at being a pompous ass and an insufferable prick. You'll just need to be comforted with the idea that in every other way I am your superior. Would you mind typing 'Uber Eats' again? We're playing a drinking game here. Thanks.
No, Concarty, you are 100% wrong.

I see that you haven’t posted the regulations and laws concerning private agreements years before a sale.

Just a clerical error, I’m sure.

What are you posting about…modifying what post?

Any obsession is on your part, Concarty…you replied to me this morning,

Are you drunk, Concarty?
 
No, Concarty, you are 100% wrong.

I see that you haven’t posted the regulations and laws concerning private agreements years before a sale.

Just a clerical error, I’m sure.

What are you posting about…modifying what post?

Any obsession is on your part, Concarty…you replied to me this morning,

Are you drunk, Concarty?

Not yet, but if EL shows up, I'm sure I will be. The over/under on Uber Eats for today is 37. I have the over.

You know exactly what I'm talking about. Excel. It is just pathetic that you are so insecure you had to lie about the fact you misspelled it. Soneone who would lie about that would lie about absolutely anything. And that's why I know for a fact that you are a compulsive liar. The uiltimate tell is lying when the truth will do. That's you. I'll bet you're lying about everything. How sad.

Your question shows clearly that you have no idea what you're talking about. There is nothing illegal about a private agreement between two parties, unless the consideration provided is not legal. Which is the exact case here. If you are not a shareholder and you are not a creditor of record, you are not entitled to a single dime from the sale of a corporation. It doesn't matter if you agreed to that. it is illegal. Your arguments always lack nuance, which is why I know you are an uneducated rube who never went to class and lived off your daddy's good will. That's what you're doing to this day. You are a joke.

In fact, you are such a compulsive liar you even lied about who replied to who this morning. Good grief. You wouldn't know the truth if it bit you in ass.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top