Once again, archaeology confirms Scripture.

CFM said:
Quit lying. There were plenty of you left wingers that had far more experience and believed the same things as Obama. The only difference, as expressed by Obama's own VP, was skin color.

Perhaps Obama should live in reality rather than the fantasy world of idealism. Good intentions don't produce good results.

You've made claims about yourself that you simply haven't proven. It's not up to me what you provide as long as it's verifiable. The loser is the one like you that makes claims then runs like a coward when asked to prove it.
Click to expand...

I am not a left winger.. My husband and I started the young Republicans in our county over 50 years ago. I resigned the Republican party when Bush invaded Iraq.

Obama came as a surprise to me. He was a far better President than I expected him to be.

Why don't you go ahead and PROVE YOUR identity......... Are you drinking or on drugs this morning?
 
kudzu said:
I am not a left winger.. My husband and I started the young Republicans in our county over 50 years ago. I resigned the Republican party when Bush invaded Iraq.

Obama came as a surprise to me. He was a far better President than I expected him to be.

Why don't you go ahead and PROVE YOUR identity......... Are you drinking or on drugs this morning?
Click to expand...

Then someone else must be posting all that left wing nonsense using your name.

You're the one making claims about yourself. Why are you afraid to prove those claims? Typical of your kind.

He didn't come as a surprise to me. There are a lot of you that saw him and thought he was qualified.
 
Grugore said:
You can split hairs and deflect all you like. The fact remains that archaeology backs up everything the Bible says.
Click to expand...

Although the coastal city of Tyre was renamed in some rather recent century, scripture indicates that it was supposed to have been destroyed and remain so, forever & ever.

Archelogically, it has always been rebuilt ... and you can google a rather nice satellite view.

The evidence clearly shows scripture to be wrong.
.
 
hypGnosis said:
Although the coastal city of Tyre was renamed in some rather recent century, scripture indicates that it was supposed to have been destroyed and remain so, forever & ever.

Archelogically, it has always been rebuilt ... and you can google a rather nice satellite view.

The evidence clearly shows scripture to be wrong.
.
Click to expand...

I wish everyone could go to Tyre, Baalbek, Bibylos and Petra.. There is so much more history in the Levant than the history of the Hebrews.
 
hypGnosis said:
Although the coastal city of Tyre was renamed in some rather recent century, scripture indicates that it was supposed to have been destroyed and remain so, forever & ever.

Archelogically, it has always been rebuilt ... and you can google a rather nice satellite view.

The evidence clearly shows scripture to be wrong.
.
Click to expand...

The original city of Tyre is underwater. It is a place where fishermen spread their nets. Just like Scripture predicted. The city currently known as Tyre is a completely different city with the same name. So the original city has never been rebuilt.
 
Grugore said:
The original city of Tyre is underwater. It is a place where fishermen spread their nets. Just like Scripture predicted. The city currently known as Tyre is a completely different city with the same name. So the original city has never been rebuilt.
Click to expand...


In a sidenote, It seems as though the bible-thumpers go all out in embracing a science such as Archeology, while wailing away with utter contempt at those sciences that do not support their biblical myths & fantasies. Just sayin'.


https://www.google.com/maps/place/T...f0e3fc6fb997408!8m2!3d33.2704888!4d35.2037641


Ok, Grugore, there is a/the link for you to see for yourself the very nice satellite photo of Tyre.

What have you in the way of Archeological evidence showing Tyre to be in/at some other location?

So far, The evidence clearly shows scripture to be wrong.
.
 
hypGnosis said:
In a sidenote, It seems as though the bible-thumpers go all out in embracing a science such as Archeology, while wailing away with utter contempt at those sciences that do not support their biblical myths & fantasies. Just sayin'.


https://www.google.com/maps/place/T...f0e3fc6fb997408!8m2!3d33.2704888!4d35.2037641


Ok, Grugore, there is a/the link for you to see for yourself the very nice satellite photo of Tyre.

What have you in the way of Archeological evidence showing Tyre to be in/at some other location?

So far, The evidence clearly shows scripture to be wrong.
.
Click to expand...

If you go to Tyre and go out on the water in a boat, you can look down and see the ruins of the original city.
http://apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=13&article=1790
 
Grugore said:
The original city of Tyre is underwater. It is a place where fishermen spread their nets. Just like Scripture predicted. The city currently known as Tyre is a completely different city with the same name. So the original city has never been rebuilt.
Click to expand...

LOLOL.. Have you been to Tyre or Byblos or Baalbek?
 
Tyre - Ancient History Encyclopedia

Tyre is an ancient Phoenician port city which, in myth, is known as the birthplace of Europa (who gave Europe its name) and Dido of Carthage (who gave aid to, and fell in love with, Aeneas of Troy).

Tyre is an ancient Phoenician port city which, in myth, is known as the birthplace of Europa (who gave Europe its name) and Dido of Carthage (who gave aid to, and fell in love with, Aeneas of Troy). The name means 'rock' and the city consisted of two parts, the main trade centre on an island, and 'old Tyre', about a half mile opposite on the mainland. The old city, known as Ushu, was founded c. 2750 BCE and the trade centre grew up shortly after.

In time, the island complex became more prosperous and populated than Ushu and was heavily fortified. The prosperity of Tyre attracted the attention of King Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon who lay siege to the city for thirteen years in the 6th century BCE without breaking their defenses. During this siege most of the inhabitants of the mainland city abandoned it for the relative safety of the island city.

Ushu became a suburb of Tyre on the mainland and remained so until the coming of Alexander the Great. The Tyrians were known as workers in dye from the shells of the Murex shellfish. This purple dye was highly valued and held royal connotations in the ancient world. It also gave the Phoenicians their name from the Greeks - Phoinikes - which means "purple people".

The city-state was the most powerful in all of Phoenicia after surpassing its sister state Sidon. Tyre is referenced in the Bible in the New Testament where it is claimed that both Jesus and St. Paul visited the city and remains famous in military history for Alexander the Great's seige.

TYRE WAS IN ITS GOLDEN AGE AROUND THE 10TH CENTURY BCE AND, IN THE 8TH, COLONIZED OTHER SITES & ENJOYED GREAT PROSPERITY.
TYRE'S GOLDEN AGE

continued


https://www.ancient.eu/Tyre/
 
Grugore said:
If you go to Tyre and go out on the water in a boat, you can look down and see the ruins of the original city.
http://apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=13&article=1790
Click to expand...

Oh how I enjoy visiting an apologetics website. It's sort of like going to Kellyanne Conway for the "alternative facts".

In the year 1170 CE, the diarist Benjamin of Tudela visited the oft rebuilt city of Tyre, calling it New Tyre, and commented on the materials used in the construction of the causeway betwixt the mainland & the island by Alexander's troops some 1,400 or so years earlier.

Those materials came primarily from the mainland portion of Tyre; and they exist today both below & above sea level as a causeway connecting mainland & island.

So even though some of the stone structures and roadways of an incarnation of Tyre were tossed into the sea, time-after-time Tyre gets rebuilt ... on the same geographic location.

This is utterly contrary to the scriptural prophecy that Tyre would never be rebuilt and "be no more forever".

The evidence clearly shows scripture to be wrong, no matter what sort of Conway-spin you feel the need to fabricate.
.
 
hypGnosis said:
Oh how I enjoy visiting an apologetics website. It's sort of like going to Kellyanne Conway for the "alternative facts".

In the year 1170 CE, the diarist Benjamin of Tudela visited the oft rebuilt city of Tyre, calling it New Tyre, and commented on the materials used in the construction of the causeway betwixt the mainland & the island by Alexander's troops some 1,400 or so years earlier.

Those materials came primarily from the mainland portion of Tyre; and they exist today both below & above sea level as a causeway connecting mainland & island.

So even though some of the stone structures and roadways of an incarnation of Tyre were tossed into the sea, time-after-time Tyre gets rebuilt ... on the same geographic location.

This is utterly contrary to the scriptural prophecy that Tyre would never be rebuilt and "be no more forever".

The evidence clearly shows scripture to be wrong, no matter what sort of Conway-spin you feel the need to fabricate.
.
Click to expand...

The current site of the city of Tyre was an island stronghold, separate from the mainland city. The original city has been destroyed and never rebuilt. The ruins are still there. Try again, dipshitzky.
 
Grugore said:
The current site of the city of Tyre was an island stronghold, separate from the mainland city. The original city has been destroyed and never rebuilt. The ruins are still there. Try again, dipshitzky.
Click to expand...

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ancient.eu/amp/1-503/

[FONT=&quot]He dismantled much of the old mainland city of Ushu as well as using fallen debris, rock, and felled trees, filling in the sea between the mainland and the island to create a land bridge for his [/FONT]war[FONT=&quot] machines. Over the centuries since, this caused heavy sedimentation to occur and permanently linked the island to the mainland; which is why Tyre is not an island today. After a siege of seven months, Alexander used his man-made causeway to batter down the walls of Tyre and take the city.[/FONT]
 
hypGnosis said:
Oh how I enjoy visiting an apologetics website. It's sort of like going to Kellyanne Conway for the "alternative facts".

In the year 1170 CE, the diarist Benjamin of Tudela visited the oft rebuilt city of Tyre, calling it New Tyre, and commented on the materials used in the construction of the causeway betwixt the mainland & the island by Alexander's troops some 1,400 or so years earlier.

Those materials came primarily from the mainland portion of Tyre; and they exist today both below & above sea level as a causeway connecting mainland & island.

So even though some of the stone structures and roadways of an incarnation of Tyre were tossed into the sea, time-after-time Tyre gets rebuilt ... on the same geographic location.

This is utterly contrary to the scriptural prophecy that Tyre would never be rebuilt and "be no more forever".

The evidence clearly shows scripture to be wrong, no matter what sort of Conway-spin you feel the need to fabricate.
.
Click to expand...

The prophets often demonized neighbors who were prosperous and more successful... saying they might be rich and beautiful, but spiritually corrupt.

Prophecy about Tryre is fairly typical of that envy.. .. and Israelites were sold in their slave markets.
 
Grugore said:
The current site of the city of Tyre was an island stronghold, separate from the mainland city. The original city has been destroyed and never rebuilt. The ruins are still there. Try again, dipshitzky.
Click to expand...

You're wrong again..........
 
kudzu said:
LOLOL.. You want my home movies? Haven't you ever been anywhere or done anything?
Click to expand...

You can choose whatever you want as long as it can be verified as what you claim. You keep asking the same question and getting the same answer to what type is acceptable. The question now is whether or not you're able to provide it. As of today, you aren't because you haven't done it.
 
CFM said:
You can choose whatever you want as long as it can be verified as what you claim. You keep asking the same question and getting the same answer to what type is acceptable. The question now is whether or not you're able to provide it. As of today, you aren't because you haven't done it.
Click to expand...

You want my US Passport? LOLOL.. That kind of stuff is against the rules.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top