Once Again Baxter is a fake libertarian

[Timshel]

LMAO... poor string, is this your new line of bullshit? Every single human on this planet began as a zygote. Every single one. We were all human at that time. Not a single one of us turned into a tree or a dog or a cow. Every single one was human from day one. Every single one of us went from single cell to multi cell. All because our genetic mapping was in that fertilized egg.

I can read, but you are incorrect... the child depends on the mother for nourishment and protection (similar to a feeding tube in a nice safe hospital bed for coma patients). The genetic coding in the child is what develops on its own. The mother doesn't do anything in that regard.

No moron, it is not the same. Not even close. A zygote IS a human. A skin cell is NOT. A skin cell doesn't develop into anything else. It is always a skin cell.

Again you come back to viability, which has nothing to do with it being human. A coma patient on life support will also die if removed from life support.


1) I am agnostic, so it is ridiculous for you to claim my position is based on faith
2) I have not rejected and scientific facts. Your entire position is based on the philosophical/legal definitions and your numerous efforts to conflate that with hard science such as genetics.

You have demonstrated time and again you cannot even grasp basic genetics. Yet you insist your moronic position is correct.

Before that we were all sperm and egg. So? Were we a human? Were we a zygote?

We have the technology to clone someone from a skin cell. The genetic mapping necessary exists in every cell of your body. Those cells are not human life.

The fact that one thing might develop into another does not make that thing the end product.

Your every point is without merit and has been disposed of repeatedly. There is no use in repeating them, but you will anyway because you have nothing more than your dogma.

You are absolutely wrong. The zygote "manifest gradually by interactions... with the external environment." That is, the mother's body. It won't happen outside of that environment. It can not be substituted for a feeding tube and a hospital bed.

You are using a circular argument. You argue the zygote is a human and skin cell is not the same as a zygote because the zygote is a human. You can do better than that dummy.

Your position is based on faith according to the sources you use. You don't have any science to back up your position.

I have crushed you on the genetics. I have made no errors and you have been proven wrong and forced to correct yourself on several points.

 

[Timshel]

LMAO... why is that String... because YOU say so?

She didn't blow it in the least. She is 100% correct. You are simply too ignorant to comprehend it.

It absolutely is characteristic of a human organism as it cannot be anything but that. It is human and alive and thus is a human organism.

I understood what she said just fine. I spoke to her point, not past it like you did with Myers.

She claims the zygote is human life because it is composed of characteristic human parts that exhibit organization towards the production of a mature human body. That simply is not true. Not at the zygote stage which is but a single cell composed of almost none of the characteristic human parts and no more than any other human cell. There is no guarantee the zygote will ever be composed of those characteristic human parts. It certainly will not be outside of the mother.

We are more than 23 pairs of chromosomes, just as a chimpanzee, bonobo, gorilla or orangutan is more than 24 pairs of chromosomes which all of them start as.

 

[Timshel]

So where you claim to be making a scientific argument and you cite to a journal published by a religious group your response is "who gives a shit?" OK. LOL.

Also, too, the nice thing about this here board is that I get to decide what I want to write about. So can you. It's pretty cool.

Also, what he cites has nothing to do with a testable hypothesis. It is not science. It is a bad philosophical opinion informed by science but ultimately seeming to be based on religious faith, just like his own opinion.

Condic seems to be a hack who uses her science credentials mostly to support her preconceived religious opinions and those of the Catholic church.
http://www.ncbcenter.org/NetCommunity/Document.Doc?id=79
https://www.google.com/#q=Maureen+L.+Condic,+Ph.D

And what about...

The above demonstrates how women fail in the sciences.

 

[Rune]

does everyone know that baxter is a fake libertarian? Just thought that might be interesting, anyway, moving onto more important stuff:

Last week many were saying romney was dead and scared shitless. I said he was fine and would even win Michigan. I also said obama would not win new hampshire when everyone else was saying he would, and I said guliani was irrelevant when people were citing usa today polls that he was ahead nationaly (rather than looking at how he stood in primary states).

Currently, Romney has two second places and two first places. He has the most delegates and usually leads in polls of republicans. Whereas many dumb and stupid people thought/continue to think mccain is going anywhere... I have said otherwise. For almost a solid year I have said it will be Hilary/Romney in the election.

I've been right this entire time on almost every prediction. I'm truly a genius, and I thought I would just point that out.

Thank you, and have a nice day.

Grind; I hate to point this out but supporting Romney makes you a conservatard, not a libertarian.