Once again, Trump is being handed a good and growing economy on a silver platter

The US will never have a good rail system.
It actually does...for cargo.
Aircraft make far more sense for long distance travel.
Yes...for people.
While 7 million barrels may not be possible,
It is easily possible.
it is possible to up production beyond what it is now.
Even past that rate. The United States has plenty of oil.
Another thing the US could do to help that is build one or more new refineries. Those are the real bottleneck here.
True enough! Yet MORE Democrat regulations prevent this!
 
I'm willing to wager I know a little more about The English Language than you do.
Actually I know as much as anyone needs to. Apparently you do not.
What is EO 13990? Hmm? What does it do? What does it say? HMM?
Considering that Tball doesn't understand or speak English, you are quite right! He only understands Liberal.
 
What are you talking about EO 13990?
That order was largely thrown out by federal courts. It did a lot of damage before it was, though.
Trying to derail the thread ?
No. He's on topic. Fallacy fallacy. Inversion fallacy.
Explain what the fuck you are talking about.
He already did. RQAA.
And for the amount of oil we consume every day it is going to take a lot more years then you think.
Nope. Once Democrat regulations are dealt with, field development can go pretty damn fast.
Especially if the price on the world market drops to where the US coil drillers and producers can't make any money drilling, they will shut down and then your back to square one again.
Awwwwwww. Are you afraid of oil and gasoline becoming cheap again? You really have no idea how capitalism works, do ya?
A lot of it has to do with world supply and demand . and if the Saudis and Russia get into another oil price war and it is looking like they may then oil prices will drop and US oil drillers and producers will shut their stuff down and US oil output will drop again.
The United States doesn't import oil from either Russia nor Saudi Arabia...and it doesn't need to.
 
Well first of all I never said it wasn't possible to increase it more,
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
a lot of that has to do with world production and demand.
The United States isn't the world, Tball. Pivot fallacy.
As I said in my last post the Saudis are playing around with the idea of another oil price war with Russia, if that happen they will flood the market and the price will drop a LOT and the US oil producers will not be able to compete and will shut down .
The United States doesn't import oil from either Saudi Arabia nor Russia.
And again right now the US oil companies have been making record profits year over year BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars.
Argument from randU fallacy. Stop making up numbers.
it sounds like you think the US TAXPAYER should help them pay for building another refinery or two so they can make billions more in profit.
Mantra 30a. Don't put words in people's mouth, Tball.
YES I agree we could use a few more refineries but NOT at taxpayers expense.
He never said the government should build refineries, Tball. Mantra 30a. Lame.
 
If you think so , just wait to see the effects of Trumps 20/ 30 /40 percent OR more tariffs are going to do to the economy.
What tariffs?
And as it has been reported several CEOs of large retail companies have said including Walmart's as soon as they know for sure he is going to put them on and how much they will be they are going to raise their prices asap.
You don't get to speak for everyone. You only get to speak for you, Tball. Omniscience fallacy.

Did you know that Walmart's products are mostly domestically manufactured?
 
In all that drivel, there was no science. "Environmental justice" was mentioned three times. Then there's this gem:

In carrying out the actions directed in this section, heads of agencies
shall seek input from the public and stakeholders, including State local,
Tribal, and territorial officials, scientists, labor unions, environmental advo-

cates, and environmental justice organizations.

Other that "scientists" there is on science in who agencies should be getting input from. Instead, it's all ill-informed opinion groups and political activists with an agenda.
The 'scientists' they refer to are 'climate scientists' (who deny theories of science). They are merely priests in the Church of Global Warming.
 
That is one of my points.
a lot of companies up their price several percent more then inflation was and padded their profits and blamed it on inflation.
and in doing that IMO gouged the American consumer.
No, Tball. Inflation has one and only one cause: The Federal Reserve, controlled by Congress (Democrats and RINOs!).
 
If you think so , just wait to see the effects of Trumps 20/ 30 /40 percent OR more tariffs are going to do to the economy.
And as it has been reported several CEOs of large retail companies have said including Walmart's as soon as they know for sure he is going to put them on and how much they will be they are going to raise their prices asap.
Not much compared to borrowing $5 trillion and doing nothing that has a return on investment like Biden did.
 
Not much compared to borrowing $5 trillion and doing nothing that has a return on investment like Biden did.
This won't be borrowing any thing it will be taking money fro the AMERICAN people and maybe driving us into a deep recession / depression like a lot of economists say it might.
 
This won't be borrowing any thing it will be taking money fro the AMERICAN people and maybe driving us into a deep recession / depression like a lot of economists say it might.
The current economic depression was started by Democrats, Tball, just like the last one was.
The economic depression during the Obama years (Obama called it the 'new normal') lasted almost a full year into the Trump administration. Trump ended it.

The Democrats started another one using the Covid Hoax (and stole the 2020 election as well).
 
Back
Top