One of the key components that conservatives miss regarding KremlinGate

archives

Verified User
is that it is not just about collusion, collusion is nearly impossible to prove, but also questionable contacts between campaign surrogates and Russian officials, undisclosed business connection between Trump Industries and individuals associated with the Kremlin, undeclared association or meetings with parties known to be Russian agents, Executive interference in the entire process, etc., etc., etc.

Unwitting actions aren't assumed defendable, Flynn proved that, and there is enough circumstantial evidence out there to merit investigation.

It is not all about collusion
 
Special Prosecutor will be looking under beds soon enough.

"Russian contacts" are nebulous - they might get some individuals into hot water-but if no "quid pro quo "
it's not collusion/nefarious.

Remember the Clinton Foundation? Pay for Play access? even that wasn't indictable without a quid pro quo
 
Good call. It's pretty much about...anything. That's what we've been telling you.

Partially, but also about Russian interference in the American electorial process, which has been proven a fact and a threat to the United States, and the President's campaign being right in the middle of it makes it more than about "nothing"
 
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah


he fires comey and the next day brings the russians into the OVAL office and hands them high level secrets

and says he fired comey to stop the investigation right to the russians


its an open and closed case
 
Special Prosecutor will be looking under beds soon enough.

"Russian contacts" are nebulous - they might get some individuals into hot water-but if no "quid pro quo "
it's not collusion/nefarious.

Remember the Clinton Foundation? Pay for Play access? even that wasn't indictable without a quid pro quo

That is what I meant by proving collusion, however, those Clinton contacts, assuming your understanding of them, were not with any nation that had just orchestrated an espionage effort against the United States, nor was there any exact meeting documented, and, as I attempted to show you with Flynn, there is a whole array of other considerations other than just quid pro quo
 
That is what I meant by proving collusion, however, those Clinton contacts, assuming your understanding of them, were not with any nation that had just orchestrated an espionage effort against the United States, nor was there any exact meeting documented, and, as I attempted to show you with Flynn, there is a whole array of other considerations other than just quid pro quo
There were plenty of "meetings documented" where money was paid to the Clinton Foundation in return for access
-that was "pay to play"
But the Russian business deals proceeded the campaign for the most part, and unless you can show a corruptive influence (like a quid pro quo) outside of ordinary geo-politics, then it's a nothingburger.
 
there is still more evidence to gather fucktard


they are going to get him on russian money laundering too
 
Back
Top