Only in the mind of a conservative...............

stoned said:
is it viewed to be a good thing for those with severe mental illness to have guns.

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/rep...to-let-severely-mentally-ill-people-get-guns/
Click to expand...

Boy it sounds really reasonable right?

Now define what mental illness prevents someone from getting a gun?

Also does it have to be diagnosed by a psychiatrist?

Once one is denied their 2nd Amendment rights because of "mental illness" is it forever?

You see the whole "mental health" schtick is a Trojan Horse designed to sound reasonable. But when you actually think about the details you see it is a backdoor way of gun grabbing.
 
stoned said:
is it viewed to be a good thing for those with severe mental illness to have guns.

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/rep...to-let-severely-mentally-ill-people-get-guns/
Click to expand...

this is why people like you and CFM will always be considered the true fascists and statists of the country. This 'rule' was enacted based on conditions so vague that if one wasn't particularly adept at handling a budget on their own, they could be denied a basic and fundamental right with NO DUE PROCESS.

you totalitarian fuckers just want to control everyone.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
this is why people like you and CFM will always be considered the true fascists and statists of the country. This 'rule' was enacted based on conditions so vague that if one wasn't particularly adept at handling a budget on their own, they could be denied a basic and fundamental right with NO DUE PROCESS.

you totalitarian fuckers just want to control everyone.
Click to expand...

So no you claim I oppose gun ownership?

You're the one that supports allowing drunk drivers to drive drunk and kill innocent people because they might get their feelings hurt by being part of a check.

Again, you couldn't live the lifestyle you claim to live for a day.
 
CFM said:
So no you claim I oppose gun ownership?
Click to expand...
READ what I wrote. I said you wanted to control everyone.

CFM said:
You're the one that supports allowing drunk drivers to drive drunk and kill innocent people because they might get their feelings hurt by being part of a check.

Again, you couldn't live the lifestyle you claim to live for a day.
Click to expand...
again, your reading comprehension and understanding is worse than my dogs.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
READ what I wrote. I said you wanted to control everyone.

again, your reading comprehension and understanding is worse than my dogs.
Click to expand...

I understand completely what you say. You want to do whatever you want whenever you want without ever being told no.

You said the way drunk drivers should be dealt with is AFTER they happen to kill an INNOCENT person.

Your dogs have a higher level of guts than you ever will, pussy. So does your wife.
 
CFM said:
I understand completely what you say. You want to do whatever you want whenever you want without ever being told no.
Click to expand...
so now that i've shown you your idiocy, you want to ignore what i wrote. i understand.

CFM said:
You said the way drunk drivers should be dealt with is AFTER they happen to kill an INNOCENT person.
Click to expand...
I said ALL drivers, not just your hated drunk ones. ALL drivers have a 4th Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, not that your statist brain pan agrees with the constitution.

CFM said:
Your dogs have a higher level of guts than you ever will, pussy. So does your wife.
Click to expand...
:chuckle: you become more unhinged every day, it's almost pathetic.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so now that i've shown you your idiocy, you want to ignore what i wrote. i understand.


I said ALL drivers, not just your hated drunk ones. ALL drivers have a 4th Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, not that your statist brain pan agrees with the constitution.


:chuckle: you become more unhinged every day, it's almost pathetic.
Click to expand...

I read what you wrote. I explained what it meant and you still deny it.

It's almost pathetic that I can do more for your wife in one setting than you've done since you married her. Maybe you should stick with the dogs.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so now that i've shown you your idiocy, you want to ignore what i wrote. i understand.


I said ALL drivers, not just your hated drunk ones. ALL drivers have a 4th Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, not that your statist brain pan agrees with the constitution.


:chuckle: you become more unhinged every day, it's almost pathetic.
Click to expand...

So you don't hate drunk drivers that kill innocent people? You keep showing that you are OK with them driving drunk.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
no, they don't. you have continually ignored what I wrote in favor of your own words. end of story.
Click to expand...

Because you say so? Again, not how it works, pussy. End of story. Don't like people calling you out for what you say, don't say it or be a man when someone calls it out.
 
CFM said:
Because you say so? Again, not how it works, pussy. End of story. Don't like people calling you out for what you say, don't say it or be a man when someone calls it out.
Click to expand...

call me out anytime you want to use WHAT I SAY, not what you wanted me to say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top