SmarterthanYou
rebel
we call dirt schwagg,
and the fly's in the face is a jam I'm not willing to take.
Oregon is full of gov bs, $50 an ounce and let the caregivers grow it.
civilians would not be able to grow it safely. The government says so.
we call dirt schwagg,
and the fly's in the face is a jam I'm not willing to take.
Oregon is full of gov bs, $50 an ounce and let the caregivers grow it.
civilians would not be able to grow it safely. The government says so.
That is NOT what "the government" says.
"Many patients have no assurance that their marijuana is not laced with pesticides or other toxic chemicals," said Rep. Jim Thompson, R-Dallas. "If passed into law, this legislation will implement safe standards to dispense the drug through a tightly-controlled system."
that's tax, and I defy anyone to prove that the gov has studies showing unsafe growing.
It's a weed, and with the right fertilizers can be grown easily. It can be grown bad but I doubt unsafe. IE Charlie browns xmas tree is not some tree I'd like to smoke.
By safe, they mean the anti-prohibition description: Putting the sale and distribution into the hands of trustworthy and accountable individuals and taking the control out of the hands of criminals.
I like this move. While I don't want the government to handle manufacturing of the weed, I agree with taking the trade away from criminals. Now the weed is gonna suck. The government will continually refine the strains to produce the least effect. They will argue this is for safety. Studies will not be able to prove higher THC content provides greater relief and thus they will be able to justify geneticly engineering the high out of weed.
Word you legalize and the criminal element is gone along with their republican auto weapons.
if you legalize or decriminalize more will be grown here and the mexicans would need to get real jobs
says the right wing tool with no investments. LOFL