Hope some bubba shoots your dog asshole
If you live in a crime infested area without adequate police protection, don’t delude yourself in thinking you will be safe with a handgun. (You would be safer by investing in better locks for your doors and windows.) If you feel that you absolutely must have a gun, then buy yourself a 12 bore double-barreled shotgun; keep it loaded and ready to hand. Unless you are a police academy (or military trained) expert with a handgun, it will not be adequate protection from an intruder or assailant bent on doing you harm; and even if you are a qualified expert, it would not be the weapon of choice, as any police officer or combat veteran will tell you.
If you live in a crime infested area without adequate police protection, don’t delude yourself in thinking you will be safe with a handgun. (You would be safer by investing in better locks for your doors and windows.) If you feel that you absolutely must have a gun, then buy yourself a 12 bore double-barreled shotgun; keep it loaded and ready to hand. Unless you are a police academy (or military trained) expert with a handgun, it will not be adequate protection from an intruder or assailant bent on doing you harm; and even if you are a qualified expert, it would not be the weapon of choice, as any police officer or combat veteran will tell you.
Mankind has been a hunter for millenia, but now those who hunt "have issues"?
You still have the desire to kill and maim wild creatures. It is that that I criticise.In order to maintain a balance in a wild ecosystem, you must have predators. Otherwise, there is no check on the population of animals that evolved as prey. Hunters provide that predation. Your suggestion that the authorities cull animal populations is fine, in a smaller system. But in my state alone, in order to maintain a stable whitetail deer population, roughly 500,000 must be removed annually. Any idea of the cost of such an operation by the authorities? To say nothing of the cost on a national scale. But in our system, not only do we control the wild population, the special taxes paid by hunters are a large part of the funding of the conservation programs. So we provide a culling service for free and pay the lion's share of the conservation programs. Much more efficient.
Do you not have farms, accredited slaughter houses, hygiene regulations or supermarkets in America?The hunt is not just about killing an animal. It is about the challenge of taking an animal with far better senses of sight, smell and hearing. And doing so in it's natural environment. I (and virtually every hunter I know) put a great deal of effort into making the kill as quick and human as possible. But the kill is a very small part of the entire hunting experience. And I have a freezer full of tasty tablefare to show for it all.
Every day people in this country are robbed, raped or murdered. You maintain that this is due to our having firearms. But the majority of those crimes are committed by people with felony records, so they do not legally own the guns they use. A free society cannot control the population nearly as well as a gov't which does not allow the same freedoms. Yet nations without our freedoms still have substantial criminal activities. Having a firearm for defense is not paranoia. It is a recognition of the hazards of living in a free society. Of the guns I own, only 3 are what I would call "defensive" firearms. One of those is an antique piece handed down from my grandfather. The rest of my gun collection is for hunting, target shooting, or are antique/collector's pieces. .
Ug, me like'em when wife sharpen spear.If you read what I said you will remember I specifically mentioned 'this millenium'. Norms and standards change, at least in civilised society they do. Does you wife/partner still live in a cave and sharpen your spear for you?
You still have the desire to kill and maim wild creatures. It is that that I criticise.
Do you not have farms, accredited slaughter houses, hygiene regulations or supermarkets in America?
Many Americans seem unable to accept that the standards by which they live are no longer acceptable.
I do not own a gun because I find the idea of taking a life without justifiable cause completely abhorrent. I do not drive a car because I live in a society where cars are more of a hindrance than a benefit. I am free to do anything I want with stress on the 'I'. I fear no man, I owe to no man, I hate no man.
Have a nice day.
what do supermarkets have to do with hunting for food?Do you not have farms, accredited slaughter houses, hygiene regulations or supermarkets in America?
How could you be a political dissident in a communist country? I dont follow your logic.
Of course every government action is not a correct action. Governments are made of people and people are fallible. So do you advocate shooting everyone in government with whom you disagree?
Why you have posted something showing Tien an men square I do not know. At the time I was living under the British government not the Chinese one. And what are you trying to prove by posting the article about the Muslims in Xin Jiang province? Urumqi is nearly 3000 km from HK? Do you think the mass ownership of guns would have made one iota of difference?
Perhaps you would like to explain why you have posted those links. I see no relevance to the discussion... unless, of course, like many of your ilk, you are trying to move the discussion from an uncomfortable place to one in which you feel you might have an advantage.
When it comes down to weapons, accuracy and maximum effective range are the critical issues; however that is not the case in close quarters, i.e., inside one's home. A pistol may be handy, but simple shotgun is more effective; and when it comes down to your personal safety, you would be wise to choose the latter. Ask any police officer, and they will tell you that a shotgun is the weapon of choice.
The weapon of choice for whom? My wife is a petite lady, and dislikes shooting a shotgun. She does, however, like shooting her revolver. She is accurate with it and very comfortable with it, both of which are more important than the weapon of choice for police officers.
Whether the shotgun is more effective inside the home is debatable. The recoil from the first round makes the second one slower to get off. The spread pattern for the buckshot, across an average sized room would be minimal (about 2 or 3 inches). Also, in order to be accurate, you must mount the shotgun to your shoulder. With the Crimson Trace the handgun can be at waist level, with both eyes open and better vision across the entire room.
But the main deciding factor is safe storage. We have a handgun box/safe that can be opened in the dark in less than a second. It takes up a little more space than a showbox.
So your wife is also consumed with fear? Sad.
She's more likely to shoot you than an intruder, statistically.
here is what happens to ignorant anti gunners who don't live their life in fear. they die in terror.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/14/william-petit-testifies-i_n_716330.html
Consumed with fear? lol Still trying to play that off?
But no, she will not shoot me. I guess you might marry an idiot, but I didn't.
we'll never know, will we? but we certainly know what NOT having a gun in the home turned out, don't we?Explain how having a gun would have saved the family in your strawman story, paranoid gunlovers.
do you have some valid study or research to show how many? or are you going to tell us to google it?Do you know how many panic-possessed gunlovers have their own weapons taken from them and used against them by criminals?
no, i'm pretty confident when strangers walk by simply by having a gun on my hip.Do you quake in terror and grab your gun every time somebody approaches your hovel?
obsessed with male genitalia are we?Do you get much sleep, or does the penis substitute under your pillow keep the fear monster away?