Panama bends the knee

Panama pledges to end key canal deal with China, work with US after Rubio visit

Panama's president vowed Sunday to end a key development deal with China after meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and after complaints from President Donald Trump that the Latin American country had ceded control over its critical shipping canal to Beijing.

José Raúl Mulino, Panama's president, said his nation's sovereignty over the 51-mile waterway, which connects the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea, will remain unchanged. But he said he would not renew a 2017 memorandum of understanding to join China’s Belt and Road global development initiative and that Panama would instead look to work more closely with the U.S.

"I think this visit opens the door to build new relations … and try to increase as much as possible U.S. investments in Panama," Mulino told reporters after meeting with Rubio on his first international trip since being confirmed.

Rubio, who was a senator representing Florida before Trump tapped him to be America's top diplomat, said his team is ready to push the U.S. agenda.


"Had the pleasure of meeting the incredible @USEmbPAN team during my first embassy meet and greet in my new role as Secretary of State!" Rubio wrote in a post on X. "Thankful for their dedication and ongoing efforts to promoting President Trump’s vision of an America First foreign policy."

During his visit, Rubio wrote in a post on X that "the United States cannot, and will not, allow the Chinese Communist Party to continue with its effective and growing control over the Panama Canal area."

Trump has complained that China exerts control over the canal and charges U.S. ships six-figure premiums to cross Panama's isthmus. The canal was built over several decades by the U.S. and completed in 1914 but handed over to Panama during the Carter administration.

Trump has made regaining ownership of the Panama Canal a priority in his administration. House Republicans introduced a bill for the United States to repurchase the Panama Canal after Trump raised concerns that the critical waterway is under Chinese control.

The bill, named the Panama Canal Repurchase Act, was introduced by Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-S.D., a member of the Select Committee on China and the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.


"President Trump is right to consider repurchasing the Panama Canal," Johnson said in a statement. "China’s interest in and presence around the canal is a cause for concern. America must project strength abroad – owning and operating the Panama Canal might be an important step towards a stronger America and a more secure globe."

Panama announced it won't renew the Belt and Road Initiative with China after Secretary of State Marco Rubio visited the country. (Reuters)

If it becomes law, the bill would give the president authority to act in coordination with the secretary of state to "initiate and conduct negotiations with appropriate counterparts of the Government of the Republic of Panama to reacquire the Panama Canal."


The U.S. Department of State estimates around 72% of all vessels that travel through the Panama Canal are coming from or going to a U.S. port.

Noting the canal's strategic importance to the United States, Johnson's office also noted how the waterway is a key transit point for U.S. Coast Guard and Department of Defense vessels.


Without access to the canal, ships would be forced to travel 8,000 additional miles around South America.

"More than 10,000 ships use the Panama Canal each year, generating billions of dollars of tolls which would economically benefit America," Johnson's office said.

While the canal and China's role in the region topped the agenda, Rubio had other items to raise.

"We also discussed efforts to end the hemisphere’s mass migration crisis and ensure fair competition for U.S. firms," Rubio added.
==========================================
Panama has agreed to get out of China Belt and Road Initiative. Panama has agreed to allow US Navy ships to jump to the front of the line when transiting the canal and will charge them $0 to cross the canal. And Panama has also agreed to stop people crossing the Darian Gap and return them home with the US help financing the plane rides back home.
they had already ended almost all projects with China back in 2019, when a new president came in and stopped it. so... literally another case just like Canada and Mexico of them "bending the knee" by doing what they already were doing? and Trump crowing victory like a braying jackass with no brain.
 
trump had to regain the news cycle after his TSA disaster was trending.

And...he ran interference so Musk could take control over all of our banking information.
Exactly, major strategy at play, classic magician’s misdirection, the give away is saying it was about fentanyl, Canada is responsible for at most 1% of the fentanyl smuggled into the US

And as you say, in the background Trump and Musk are opening up Americans personal data
 
Did you see his self own? The Daily Show ran the tape. I can’t find it on any other news segment.

Felonious actually said, “I look at some of the deals made, I say, ‘Who the hell made these deals? They’re so bad,'”

I was cracking up! Felonious is the one. He was cutting down his own trade deals 🤣🤣

View: https://youtu.be/TLOuiApOnbw?si=ZA0JEjaVEkOKRG6Y
His first time around, he simply undid previous trade agreements in order to put his name on something. The fool doesn't realize that history will never forget him.
 
I have forgotten more about the market than you will ever know. The fact remains that someone who turns 62 today would have been way better off with their money in an S&P500 fund than with socialist insecurity. They would be living off of way more money. Even with those corrections which by the way bounced back shortly thereafter. So nobody would have gone "bankrupt" as you claim. As always, you are over your skis
You stupid, stupid fuck. Stop trying to qualify your moronic ideas by narrowing the scope. If Dubyah was successful at doing away with SS and 'allowing' people to put the 6% FICA they pay (doubled by employer) into the market, millions of retirees would be dead or homeless.

You stupid, stupid fuck.
 
You stupid, stupid fuck. Stop trying to qualify your moronic ideas by narrowing the scope. If Dubyah was successful at doing away with SS and 'allowing' people to put the 6% FICA they pay (doubled by employer) into the market, millions of retirees would be dead or homeless.

You stupid, stupid fuck.
Triggered much?
 
You stupid, stupid fuck. Stop trying to qualify your moronic ideas by narrowing the scope. If Dubyah was successful at doing away with SS and 'allowing' people to put the 6% FICA they pay (doubled by employer) into the market, millions of retirees would be dead or homeless.

You stupid, stupid fuck.
So you are losing the argument and you resort to petty insults?

So let's back up, If 43 had been successful, it would not have applied to EVERYONE. Those already in socialist insecurity would have stayed where they are, and there would have been a gradual ramp up by age group.

This notion that "millions of retirees would have been dead or homeless" is irrational and not based in any fact. It is based on your emotion and of course desire to control people because if your self righteous nature.
 
So you are losing the argument and you resort to petty insults?

So let's back up, If 43 had been successful, it would not have applied to EVERYONE. Those already in socialist insecurity would have stayed where they are, and there would have been a gradual ramp up by age group.

This notion that "millions of retirees would have been dead or homeless" is irrational and not based in any fact. It is based on your emotion and of course desire to control people because if your self righteous nature.
LMAO. You get insulted because you deserve to be insulted.

This is the moronic plan, albeit all over the map, that Bush might have been thinking of. Why don't you tell us all how this would be better, given that it took Obama years to fix Bush's mess. And then the trump virus crashed the market 9 years after the planned implementation of Bush's mess.

You get to put $1000/year into a limited number of index funds. Said funds took a shit in 2020. I love the part about having to pay back all of the money you 'invested', plus interest, plus inflation, upon retirement.

 
LMAO. You get insulted because you deserve to be insulted.

This is the moronic plan, albeit all over the map, that Bush might have been thinking of. Why don't you tell us all how this would be better, given that it took Obama years to fix Bush's mess. And then the trump virus crashed the market 9 years after the planned implementation of Bush's mess.

You get to put $1000/year into a limited number of index funds. Said funds took a shit in 2020. I love the part about having to pay back all of the money you 'invested', plus interest, plus inflation, upon retirement.

There was never a bill crafted and anyone can cherry pick the worst years of the market.

Let me ask you a question. Were you invested in the stock market during those corrections? Did you LOSE everything?

You are clearly missing the point. Which you often do, What I am talking about is allowing those who are entering teh work force the opportunity to opt out of socialist insecurity and invest it in the stock market. Yes, it would be index funds. No individual stocks. No leveraged funds. Over the course of working 40 years one would have a very nice nest egg

But let's play your game. $1000/year isn't much but let's go with it. $1000/year starting at age 21 through age 65 and never increasing it and averaging 7% return a year would leave you with almost $434,000 which is a shit ton more money than you would see from socialist insecurity.
 
Back
Top