Papal front runners. If the Black guy becomes the next pope, white Republicans will scream DEI till their buttholes explode

FastLane said:
I know you THINK they have not changed God's word but they think they have.

This is from a Catholic Catechism

Second, from Reverend Steven Keenan’s Doctrinal Catechism we read this: “Question: Have you any other way of proving that the Church has power to institute festivals of precept? Answer: Had she not such power, she could not have done that in which all modern religionists agree with her; she could not have substituted the observance of Sunday, the first day of the week, for the observance of Saturday, the seventh day; a change for which there is no Scriptural authority.”
Here is another Catechism

First, from the Convert’s Catechism of Catholic Doctrine by Reverend Peter Giermann. “Question: Which is the Sabbath day? Answer: Saturday is the Sabbath day. Question: Why do we observe Sunday instead of Saturday? Answer: We observe Sunday instead of Saturday because the Catholic Church in the Council of Laodicea transferred the solemnity from Saturday to Sunday.”

Here is a well know Catholic book on the Catholic faith.

The Faith of Millions, p. 473. “But since Saturday, not Sunday, is specified in the Bible, isn’t it curious that non-Catholics who profess to take their religion directly from the Bible and not from the Church, observe Sunday instead of Saturday? Yes, of course, it is inconsistency but this change was made about fifteen centuries before Protestantism was born, and by that time the custom was universally observed. They have continued the custom even though it rests upon the authority of the Catholic Church and not upon an explicit text from the Bible. That observance remains as a reminder of the Mother Church from which the non-Catholic sects broke away like a boy running away from home but still carrying in his pocket a picture of his mother or a lock of her hair.”

I have more but you should get the point.
Click to expand...
This man was from the early-mid 1800s! Even the title shows the man's bias, calling people "modern heretics" based on his interpretation.

A doctrinal catechism: wherein divers points of Catholic faith and practice assailed by modern heretics are sustained by an appeal to the Holy Scriptures, the testimony of the ancient fathers, and the dictates of reason, on the basis of Scheffmacher's Catechism​

by Keenan, Stephen, 1805-1862

How about you read this book and then you'll have some genuine facts from the Church to argue about.

www.usccb.org

Catechism of the Catholic Church

Read the Catechism of the Catholic Church online Online Version FAQs about the Catechism In reading the Catechism of the Catholic Church we can...
www.usccb.org www.usccb.org
 
Bai Lan said:
the pope was down with it.

quit being fucking stupid.

why do you whitewash a satanic pedophile organization?

you're ill
Click to expand...
The Pope was down with it? You're just dumb. Read a book for a change.

"The Spanish Inquisition was unique at the time because it was not led by the Pope. Once the bull of creation was granted, the head of the Inquisition was the Monarch of Spain. It was in charge of enforcing the laws of the king regarding religion and other private-life matters, not of following orders from Rome, from which it was independent. This independence allowed the Inquisition to investigate, prosecute, and convict clergy for both corruption and treason of conspiracy against the crown (on the Pope's behalf, presumably) without the Pope's intervention.

The Inquisition was, despite its title of "Holy", not necessarily formed by the clergy, and secular lawyers were equally welcome to it. If it was an attempt at keeping Rome out of Spain, it was an extremely successful and refined one. It was a bureaucratic body that had the nominal authority of the church and permission to prosecute members of the church, which the kings could not do, while answering only to the Spanish Crown. This did not prevent the Pope from having some influence on the decisions of Spanish monarchs, but it did force the influence to be through the kings, making direct influence very difficult."

en.wikipedia.org

Spanish Inquisition - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
christiefan915 said:
The Pope was down with it? You're just dumb. Read a book for a change.

"The Spanish Inquisition was unique at the time because it was not led by the Pope. Once the bull of creation was granted, the head of the Inquisition was the Monarch of Spain. It was in charge of enforcing the laws of the king regarding religion and other private-life matters, not of following orders from Rome, from which it was independent. This independence allowed the Inquisition to investigate, prosecute, and convict clergy for both corruption and treason of conspiracy against the crown (on the Pope's behalf, presumably) without the Pope's intervention.

The Inquisition was, despite its title of "Holy", not necessarily formed by the clergy, and secular lawyers were equally welcome to it. If it was an attempt at keeping Rome out of Spain, it was an extremely successful and refined one. It was a bureaucratic body that had the nominal authority of the church and permission to prosecute members of the church, which the kings could not do, while answering only to the Spanish Crown. This did not prevent the Pope from having some influence on the decisions of Spanish monarchs, but it did force the influence to be through the kings, making direct influence very difficult."

en.wikipedia.org

Spanish Inquisition - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
so who granted the bull of creation?

as dumb as as that is.

sounds like an attempt at elitist plausible deniability, like all establishment murder programs.
 
FastLane said:
Ever heard of Cardinal Bellarmine? Pope Clement made him Cardinal Inquistor. He was a brutal man who killed many protestants.

You would think God's church would never slaughter thousands of men women and children.
Click to expand...
It was political, not religious.

Spanish Inquisition, (1478–1834), judicial institution ostensibly established to combat heresy in Spain. In practice, the Spanish Inquisition served to consolidate power in the monarchy of the newly unified Spanish kingdom, but it achieved that end through infamously brutal methods.
 
FastLane said:
No you showed me where Jesus gave them the gospel and told them to spread it. None of them , ZERO, can be shown in the Bible absolving anyone of their sins.

You have misinterpreted the symbolism of what Christ said. The disciples knew what he meant. They never thought they had the power to decide who could be forgiven of sin . Not even one time.
Click to expand...
they have all this shit about Peter and rocks and shit.
 
christiefan915 said:
This man was from the early-mid 1800s! Even the title shows the man's bias, calling people "modern heretics" based on his interpretation.

A doctrinal catechism: wherein divers points of Catholic faith and practice assailed by modern heretics are sustained by an appeal to the Holy Scriptures, the testimony of the ancient fathers, and the dictates of reason, on the basis of Scheffmacher's Catechism​

by Keenan, Stephen, 1805-1862

How about you read this book and then you'll have some genuine facts from the Church to argue about.

www.usccb.org

Catechism of the Catholic Church

Read the Catechism of the Catholic Church online Online Version FAQs about the Catechism In reading the Catechism of the Catholic Church we can...
www.usccb.org www.usccb.org
Click to expand...
How about this Christie is it official church enough for you?

Canon 29. Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord's Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ.
 
FastLane said:
Ever heard of Cardinal Bellarmine? Pope Clement made him Cardinal Inquistor. He was a brutal man who killed many protestants.

You would think God's church would never slaughter thousands of men women and children.
Click to expand...
Explain why you aren't responsible for the widespread Protestant persecution of Anabaptists and witch burnings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top