BattleofHodow
New member
It's a place for idiots to gather to discuss treason and murder.
Why aren't you on it, Rev? Why were you too gutless to go to DC? Couldn't afford the bus fare?
Does the concept of freedom of speech bother you!?
It's a place for idiots to gather to discuss treason and murder.
Why aren't you on it, Rev? Why were you too gutless to go to DC? Couldn't afford the bus fare?
He's on the no-fly, no-ride list.![]()
Witold, you're making yourself look stupid again, son. Please stop doing that. If you want to debate Poles and Jews, go start a thread on it.
All of your whining is making you look weak. Women don't like weak, whiny assholes like yourself. Work on it, please.![]()
Does the concept of freedom of speech bother you!?
Not quite, currently all they have is a 404 message set that says they support free speech and civil discourse.
No. In fact, I swore an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and still abide by that oath. Does it bother you, Witold?
I hope.
Something needs to be done to ensure free discourse and political speech!
Is that the app or the website?
Ummmm....there's a lot of ways that can go.
There are three main means of behavioral modification: Positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement and punishment.
Punishment produces the fastest results, but is the shortest lasting. Positive reinforcement takes the longest but has the longest lasting results.
Banning shit is punishment. It's punishing people for doing something. Better, IMO, to reward them for being good people.
Agreed. It's a common problem with ancient texts. IMHO, it's best to look at the concept they are attempting to convey rather than the "power of the written word" being presented. I do not take any ancient texts literally. Some can be verified to a small extent, but the point seems to be conveying a way of thinking, not just saying who did what to whom.
Example. If you wanted to end racism in the civilized world, is it better to stamp it out with laws and, when necessary, force or is it better to try to teach others a way of thinking where racism is unimportant because it doesn't exist?
....must be my fault....
...Constitution of where!? England!?
I've always supported the First Amendment, Witold.Tell us about these comments of yours apparently supporting criminalized hate speech against the 1 st amendment!?
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?159409-Which-Side&p=4177604#post4177604
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ng-our-country-together&p=4132066#post4132066
No. In fact, I swore an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and still abide by that oath. Does it bother you, Witold?
I've always supported the First Amendment, Witold.
Have you considered asking someone with an IQ higher than your 85 to ask these questions? Maybe they'll 'splain it to you, Lucy.![]()
Parler is going to go big time taking disenchanted and disenfranchised users from Twitter. Holy fuck, Trump had 80 million followers alone!!
Why do I need a new shithole filled with more braindead haters? I have my own brain fir that.
Is that the app or the website?
The website. The app still points to the old ip causing the same error. They'll have to update the app in order for it to get that same error. They simply purchased a new server space and have to load backups, etc. to the new server, then update the app to point to the new site IP. Boom...
Probably will take a couple weeks though to do it all, usually their backups are larger than this site... lol
i went over this before with you.So you favor the Government interfering in the private sphere? Not very conservative of you
Not “free discourse,” no more “free discourse” than Rush Limbaugh’s or any of the other demagogues’ radio show is “free discourse”
As the right so often says, let the market decide, if Twitter and such banning Trump is so disagreeable, a competitor should profit
i went over this before with you.
Limbaugh is a broadcast. Social media is interactive -got the difference?
I cant speak on a Limbagh broadcast, I can on social media
This private thing never was envisioned by the founders. Yes there were newspapers that controlled content.
But there was also pamphleteering and the public square for the common man
Those dont exist anymore either.
The public square is now solely social media -it needs to allow unfettered political speech
No,you don't.
You clearly proposed hate speech laws in those 2 comments as options.
- you're nihilism ( extreme dissatisfaction with the established order) knows know bounds.Rush Limbaugh will soon be dead and I will drink to the Gods thanking them for his death.