Go Gore and the Green Party! Put him out there! Woot!A sound third party candidate ? Like Gore for the Green party ?
Go Gore and the Green Party! Put him out there! Woot!A sound third party candidate ? Like Gore for the Green party ?
Go Gore and the Green Party! Put him out there! Woot!
Shhh... Our plan to get a non-religious republican into office will be dead before it gets off the ground!yeah... if the Dems really want to hand it to the Reps, run Gore as Green and Hillary as the Dem. Split of the Dem vote and Rudy wins.
He may be "non-religious" but he will nominate judges that the religious right approve of. He will be beholden to them and this is part of Robertson's strategy. If Rudy wins by just enough Robertson can say it was his endorsement of him that carried him there and threaten to withdraw it come re-election time. Until the Repub party jetisons the Relgious right platforms in their party the nominee will ALWAYS cowtow to them.Shhh... Our plan to get a non-religious republican into office will be dead before it gets off the ground!
Shhh... Our plan to get a non-religious republican into office will be dead before it gets off the ground!
He may be "non-religious" but he will nominate judges that the religious right approve of. He will be beholden to them and this is part of Robertson's strategy. If Rudy wins by just enough Robertson can say it was his endorsement of him that carried him there and threaten to withdraw it come re-election time. Until the Repub party jetisons the Relgious right platforms in their party the nominee will ALWAYS cowtow to them.
Until we start electing non-religious republicans the platform will never change.He may be "non-religious" but he will nominate judges that the religious right approve of. He will be beholden to them and this is part of Robertson's strategy. If Rudy wins by just enough Robertson can say it was his endorsement of him that carried him there and threaten to withdraw it come re-election time. Until the Repub party jetisons the Relgious right platforms in their party the nominee will ALWAYS cowtow to them.
But hasn't it been shown that formula lacks the natural antibodies that the child picks up from the breast milk?
A side question... if self-reliance is the determining factor, why not apply that to everyone? If you are not self-reliant... then you can be killed?
I agree, I just disagree with the method of termination.well im not here to debate merits of my opinion.. All i know is if a woman gets prego and doesn't want to be prego she should be able to terminate pregnancy without going to jail.
well im not here to debate merits of my opinion.. All i know is if a woman gets prego and doesn't want to be prego she should be able to terminate pregnancy without going to jail.
I agree, I just disagree with the method of termination.
Bloomberg! Bloomberg! Bloomberg!
Removal of the progeny with an attempt to save its life. Thus recognizing its right to live, the woman's right to choose to be an incubator or not, and extending science into a new arena whose sole purpose is not to end a life.If you desire, could you expand... what method of termination do you think would be ok?
Fair enough. I mean, like, why debate an issue on a political board. Lets just hold hands and chant with the others...."Bush is evil! Bush is evil! Dems are gods, Dems are Gods!"
well this is one of those issues that its rediculous to debate. everyone has there opinion. mine is that womans rights comes before fetus till latter in pregnancy.
Removal of the progeny with an attempt to save its life. Thus recognizing its right to live, the woman's right to choose to be an incubator or not, and extending science into a new arena whose sole purpose is not to end a life.
Until we start electing non-religious republicans the platform will never change.
You got it!!!