Pat Robertson supports Pro-Choice canidate!

Or Paul for the Libertarians again. I think Gore and Paul as third party candidates could shake this shit up till it foams over.
 
yeah... if the Dems really want to hand it to the Reps, run Gore as Green and Hillary as the Dem. Split of the Dem vote and Rudy wins.
Shhh... Our plan to get a non-religious republican into office will be dead before it gets off the ground!
 
Shhh... Our plan to get a non-religious republican into office will be dead before it gets off the ground!
He may be "non-religious" but he will nominate judges that the religious right approve of. He will be beholden to them and this is part of Robertson's strategy. If Rudy wins by just enough Robertson can say it was his endorsement of him that carried him there and threaten to withdraw it come re-election time. Until the Repub party jetisons the Relgious right platforms in their party the nominee will ALWAYS cowtow to them.
 
Shhh... Our plan to get a non-religious republican into office will be dead before it gets off the ground!

My bad... quick... delete my last post before they catch on.

oh wait, the dems on this board are kind of slow and do a very poor job of actually comprehending what they read. Take your time.
 
He may be "non-religious" but he will nominate judges that the religious right approve of. He will be beholden to them and this is part of Robertson's strategy. If Rudy wins by just enough Robertson can say it was his endorsement of him that carried him there and threaten to withdraw it come re-election time. Until the Repub party jetisons the Relgious right platforms in their party the nominee will ALWAYS cowtow to them.

In my opinion, whomever should win in 2008 will not be re-elected in 2012.
 
He may be "non-religious" but he will nominate judges that the religious right approve of. He will be beholden to them and this is part of Robertson's strategy. If Rudy wins by just enough Robertson can say it was his endorsement of him that carried him there and threaten to withdraw it come re-election time. Until the Repub party jetisons the Relgious right platforms in their party the nominee will ALWAYS cowtow to them.
Until we start electing non-religious republicans the platform will never change.
 
But hasn't it been shown that formula lacks the natural antibodies that the child picks up from the breast milk?

A side question... if self-reliance is the determining factor, why not apply that to everyone? If you are not self-reliant... then you can be killed? :)

well im not here to debate merits of my opinion.. All i know is if a woman gets prego and doesn't want to be prego she should be able to terminate pregnancy without going to jail.
 
well im not here to debate merits of my opinion.. All i know is if a woman gets prego and doesn't want to be prego she should be able to terminate pregnancy without going to jail.
I agree, I just disagree with the method of termination.
 
well im not here to debate merits of my opinion.. All i know is if a woman gets prego and doesn't want to be prego she should be able to terminate pregnancy without going to jail.

Fair enough. I mean, like, why debate an issue on a political board. Lets just hold hands and chant with the others...."Bush is evil! Bush is evil! Dems are gods, Dems are Gods!" :rolleyes:
 
If you desire, could you expand... what method of termination do you think would be ok?
Removal of the progeny with an attempt to save its life. Thus recognizing its right to live, the woman's right to choose to be an incubator or not, and extending science into a new arena whose sole purpose is not to end a life.
 
Fair enough. I mean, like, why debate an issue on a political board. Lets just hold hands and chant with the others...."Bush is evil! Bush is evil! Dems are gods, Dems are Gods!" :rolleyes:

well this is one of those issues that its rediculous to debate. everyone has there opinion. mine is that womans rights comes before fetus till latter in pregnancy.
 
well this is one of those issues that its rediculous to debate. everyone has there opinion. mine is that womans rights comes before fetus till latter in pregnancy.

I was just giving you shit. I know this is a pretty cut and dry issue for most people.
 
Removal of the progeny with an attempt to save its life. Thus recognizing its right to live, the woman's right to choose to be an incubator or not, and extending science into a new arena whose sole purpose is not to end a life.

I'd be on board with that.
 
Back
Top