Pelosi: Biden case "closed"

:nono:

Earl isn't a virtue-signaling faux feminist who shrieks "believe all women" when it's it's politically convenient.

I find it a tad hypocritical that "believe all women" seems to apply only for Dems, and that repubs turn a blind eye about harassment or assault when it comes to their allies.
 
I don't. Yet she only sexual harassment in the Biden workplace, not sexual assault by Biden or anybody else.

I believe that at the time Biden probably invaded her personal space and made her uncomfortable, but that there was no sexual assault.

No,no, Miss Marple, she says that Biden penetrated her with his finger...that is the definition of sexual assault.
 
I find it a tad hypocritical that "believe all women" seems to apply only for Dems, and that repubs turn a blind eye about harassment or assault when it comes to their allies.

Believe all women no longer applies to any Democrats but it did with the Democrats before...with Kavanaugh, Miss Marple.
 
New evidence appears in the Joe Biden case



https://thelibertyloft.com/new-evidence-appears-in-the-joe-biden-case/

Let's put it all out there, Legion...it is ugly.

“So, he had one hand underneath my shirt, and the other had, I had a skirt on, and he went down my skirt and then went up and I remember I was up almost on my tippy toes.

“When he went inside the skirt, he was talking to me at the same time, and he was leaning into me and I pulled this way away from his head.”

As he kissed her neck, he asked in a whisper if she wanted to go somewhere else, she said.

Although she can’t remember everything he said, she still remembers him saying: “I want to f–k you.”

“He said it low and I was pushing away and I remember my knee hurting because he had opened my legs with his knee and our kneecaps clashed so I felt like a sharp pain.

“His fingers were inside of my private area – my vagina – and there was no small talk, there was no precept, it was just sudden and it was happening like that.

“He was saying those things to me and I was pulling away.”

When she refused his advances and was “obviously just tensed up and frozen” Reade said Biden pulled back."
 
Not now that we learned she had no corroborated witnesses and I did not say I did not believe her when she first wrongly accused Kavanaugh, Miss Marple.

MS. Reid has several corroborating witnesses and now a 1996 court document (see OP) sexual harassment filing.

Who is Carroll?

Mr. Earl, surely you jest? Dr. Ford also has corroborating witnesses, i.e. her husband, her therapist and some friends. Perhaps you mean eyewitnesses? Neither had them.

Christine Blasey Ford’s legal team has released a statement from her friend Keith Koegler, who provided an account that appears to corroborate Ford’s testimony accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, but the FBI did not interview him. In a letter to the Senate, Koegler expressed concern over its decision to rush Kavanaugh’s confirmation process without hearing from Ford’s corroborating witnesses, including himself. The letter was obtained by Fox News anchor Shannon Bream and MSNBC’s Kyle Griffin.

“There are a minimum of 7 additional people, known to the White House, the Senate Judiciary Committee and the FBI who knew about the assault prior to the nomination who were not interviewed,” Koegler wrote. “I am one of them.”


Also, I and others have been posting E. Jean Carroll's allegations about trump for several months now. Scan through these threads and note that the usual suspects don't believe her story but believe Reade's story, which is almost identical in the details. Also take note that you contributed on some of these threads. :smile:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...gain-E-Jean-Carroll&highlight=e.+jean+carroll
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...raped-in-dept-store&highlight=e.+jean+carroll
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...still-has-the-DRESS&highlight=e.+jean+carroll
 
Let's put it all out there, Legion...it is ugly.

“So, he had one hand underneath my shirt, and the other had, I had a skirt on, and he went down my skirt and then went up and I remember I was up almost on my tippy toes.

“When he went inside the skirt, he was talking to me at the same time, and he was leaning into me and I pulled this way away from his head.”

As he kissed her neck, he asked in a whisper if she wanted to go somewhere else, she said.

Although she can’t remember everything he said, she still remembers him saying: “I want to f–k you.”

“He said it low and I was pushing away and I remember my knee hurting because he had opened my legs with his knee and our kneecaps clashed so I felt like a sharp pain.

“His fingers were inside of my private area – my vagina – and there was no small talk, there was no precept, it was just sudden and it was happening like that.

“He was saying those things to me and I was pulling away.”

When she refused his advances and was “obviously just tensed up and frozen” Reade said Biden pulled back."

Of course, that's what she says. She has no proof.

But don't RATS usually "believe all women" whether there is proof or not?
 
No,no, Miss Marple, she says that Biden penetrated her with his finger...that is the definition of sexual assault.

Yes yes, Mr. Earl. I am talking about the 1996 document you've been multi-threading. There is no mention of any kind of assault in it.

And FTR penetration is exactly what Ms. Carroll accuses trump of doing.
 
Mr. Earl, surely you jest? Dr. Ford also has corroborating witnesses, i.e. her husband, her therapist and some friends. Perhaps you mean eyewitnesses? Neither had them.

Christine Blasey Ford’s legal team has released a statement from her friend Keith Koegler, who provided an account that appears to corroborate Ford’s testimony accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, but the FBI did not interview him. In a letter to the Senate, Koegler expressed concern over its decision to rush Kavanaugh’s confirmation process without hearing from Ford’s corroborating witnesses, including himself. The letter was obtained by Fox News anchor Shannon Bream and MSNBC’s Kyle Griffin.

“There are a minimum of 7 additional people, known to the White House, the Senate Judiciary Committee and the FBI who knew about the assault prior to the nomination who were not interviewed,” Koegler wrote. “I am one of them.”


Also, I and others have been posting E. Jean Carroll's allegations about trump for several months now. Scan through these threads and note that the usual suspects don't believe her story but believe Reade's story, which is almost identical in the details. Also take note that you contributed on some of these threads. :smile:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...gain-E-Jean-Carroll&highlight=e.+jean+carroll
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...raped-in-dept-store&highlight=e.+jean+carroll
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...still-has-the-DRESS&highlight=e.+jean+carroll

They were not interviewed by the FBI where they would be subject to criminal prosecution if they lied, Miss Marple...so their testimony is suspect.

Let's have an FBI investigation, witnesses questioned where they can be prosecuted if they lie and see what comes out from under the rug.

Deal?
 
Yet Y O U believed Ford, who had no eyewitness...didn't you?

Answer, Christiecrite. :burn:

I did not believe or disbelieve Ford (always believing the woman is the Democrat mantra...unless the accused is a Democrat) Miss Marple.

Let's get the FBI on the case (as with Kavanaugh) and see what happens.
 
I did not believe or disbelieve Ford (always believing the woman is the Democrat mantra...unless the accused is a Democrat) Miss Marple.

Well put, Earl.









Top RATS said in 2018 that women do not concoct sexual assault allegations, emphasizing that Christine Blasey Ford had "nothing to gain" from accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct

Many of those same RATS have unified behind Joe Biden in 2020 as he denies a sexual assault allegation by Tara Reade.

RATS have turned away from the broad proclamations they issued during the Kavanaugh confirmation fight, including demands that all women be believed, that the presumption of innocence does not apply to those seeking high office, as well as calls for federal investigations of decades-old claims.





https://freebeacon.com/2020-election/flashback-democrats-said-women-dont-make-up-sexual-assaults-ford-had-nothing-to-gain/
 
They were not interviewed by the FBI where they would be subject to criminal prosecution if they lied, Miss Marple...so their testimony is suspect.

Let's have an FBI investigation, witnesses questioned where they can be prosecuted if they lie and see what comes out from under the rug.

Deal?

That's exactly the point Mr. Earl. Dr. Ford's corroborators were willing to testify to the FBI but not allowed to do so.

You got yourself a deal, Mr. Earl. Let's get them all investigated and let the chips fall where they may.
 
Yes yes, Mr. Earl. I am talking about the 1996 document you've been multi-threading. There is no mention of any kind of assault in it.

And FTR penetration is exactly what Ms. Carroll accuses trump of doing.

Yes, there is, Miss Marple.

"In it, he writes Reade told him about “a problem she was having at work regarding sexual harassment, in U.S. Senator Joe Biden’s office.”
 
That's exactly the point Mr. Earl. Dr. Ford's corroborators were willing to testify to the FBI but not allowed to do so.

You got yourself a deal, Mr. Earl. Let's get them all investigated and let the chips fall where they may.

Sounds good, Miss Marple.

Since the thread is about Biden (Biden case closed) let's begin with Biden.
 
Back
Top