Penny for your thoughts

[Diogenes]

Negligence ...for example, someone who fires a gun in the air. They aren't trying to kill someone, but they are showing no regard for the safety of the people around.

It wasn't Penny who brought the proverbial gun into the subway car, it was Neely. Neely is the person who threatened indiscriminate harm to the people in the crowd; Penny stood up to attempt to stop it.

You don't need to convince me. The defense needs to convince at least one juror.

 

[archives]

Is that right, Anchovies?

Yep, “will leave chilling message for New York thinking,” how New Yorkers think is about as far away from your understanding as that of your knowledge of those in Côte d'Azur

 

[Diogenes]

Yep, “will leave chilling message for New York thinking,” how New Yorkers think is about as far away from your understanding as that of your knowledge of those in Côte d'Azur

Is it, Anchovies?

 

[Diogenes]

No, not really, had an inclination on how it would turn out, but no real opinion

Trump is on trial because he has been indicted by four separate Grand Juries in four different locations, Grand Juries are not Stalinistic And if he is guilty he will still run for President, Eugene Debs ran for President from a jail cell, perhaps he’ll be confined to Trump proprieties or a Trump judge will allow him out while he appeals

 

[Diogenes]

No, not really, had an inclination on how it would turn out, but no real opinion

Trump is running for President to pardon himself so that he can end all the exposing indictments and eliminate any possibility of him being found guilty, of anything, ever

 

[Diogenes]

Entire Jury Should Have Acquitted Penny Immediately, Not Deadlocked​

By: Brianna Lyman
December 06, 2024

Late Friday morning the members of the jury in the case against American hero Daniel Penny informed the court that they are struggling to reach a verdict — and that alone is a travesty.

The reality is that Penny, a Marine veteran, stepped up to protect innocent passengers on a New York City subway in May of 2023 when a belligerent, out-of-control thug, Jordan Neely, began taunting passengers that “I’m going to kill you,” “I’m prepared to go to jail for life,” and “I’m willing to die.” Notably, Neely had an active warrant out for an alleged assault in 2021 that involved him assaulting a woman on the subway, according to Fox News.


In the face of this threat, Penny did what any brave, decent American should do, he intervened and subdued Neely to protect the lives of everyone on that train.

One witness who described herself as a woman of color told Fox News in the aftermath that Penny was a “hero.”

Entire Jury Should Have Acquitted Penny Immediately

On Friday morning the jury in the case against hero Daniel Penny told the court it is struggling to reach a verdict. That alone is a travesty.

thefederalist.com

 

[Diogenes]

No, not really, had an inclination on how it would turn out, but no real opinion

Only effects 20% of those convicted, and two of the lesser charges against Trump, as if that trial is ever going to occur Another one of those “Textualism” cases, what did the original lawmakers mean by “otherwise,” hard to understand how attempting to stop an official proceedings of Congress isn’t considered obstruction

 

[Diogenes]

Probably not, you might find something regarding how I think it will turn out, but no editorializing on what I think should happen

Nah, just staring the facts, she’s has managed to put Smith more on trial than Trump

 

[Diogenes]

Probably not, you might find something regarding how I think it will turn out, but no editorializing on what I think should happen

It is a deposit bet they are going to bounce it back to the lower courts for further definitions to insure Trump can’t face trial prior to November

Interesting how they supposedly follow Originalism, where here there is zero mention of Presidential immunity in the Constitution nor writings of the Founding Fathers, a variable they have shelved here. And Textualism, which scribes they are suppose to deal with what is infront of them now and not concern themselves with supposed effect on the future they expressed in their questions

What is going to be interesting is the gun case also waiting their decision, if one guilty of spousal abuse should be allowed to access a gun. Based on all their prior gun decisions it should be a no brained for them, but they know if they rule yes it could cost Trump some suburban women vote, so don’t be surprised if they vote yes guns can be restricted under those circumstances

 

[Diogenes]

​

Daniel Penny (24) put a homeless felon in a fataI chokehold to stop him from attacking people on his NY train.

Bail: $200,000

Appeal: Rejected

Trial: Ongoing

Jordan Williams (20) stabbed and kiIIed a homeless man to stop him from attacking people on his NY train.

Bail: $0

Charges: Dropped

 

[Diogenes]

GUESS WHO THIS IS?​

 

[Dutch Uncle]

We’ll let the Court decide, that kinda blows the intent of your whole thread now doesn’t it

You can't have an opinion?

Legina, I know your mind is going...and you can report me to @Damocles for disagreeing with you, but reporting facts or waiting for judicial judgments isn't the same as you and all your sock puppetry BS*.

Regardless, you are free to be the pussified POS you have become regardless of Damo's level of support.


*the fact you don't know most sane and educated people can see you for who you are is very interesting to me.

 

[archives]

As I said, comical, MAGA’s sudden so concern with Daniel Perry’s case is similar to their supposed emphatic interest in Laken Riley, they are only anxious as far as they can pimp it, bottom line is they don’t give a rat’s ass about either individual or their cases

 

[Diogenes]

As I said, comical, MAGA’s sudden so concern with Daniel Perry’s case is similar to their supposed emphatic interest in Laken Riley, they are only anxious as far as they can pimp it, bottom line is they don’t give a rat’s ass about either individual or their cases

Is that so, Anchovies?

Say, didn't you say you hadn't expressed any "editorializing" opinions about the outcomes of judicial proceedings a while ago?

So, Johnson thinks this should be handled expeditiously yet such as the immunity case , which has been infront of the Court for over six months now, has no need to be prioritized? And for the Court, especially after the recent Alito debacle, it would completely ruin what little respect they have left by honoring Johnson’s call

 

[Diogenes]

Probably not, you might find something regarding how I think it will turn out, but no editorializing on what I think should happen

Keep in mind, Smith initially requested the SCOTUS take up this case last December

Americans need to know before they vote if one of the candidates running for office is guilty of attempting to sabotage an election, apparently a fact the Supreme Court doesn’t think is relevant

Given recent upside down flags and such is there any doubt Trump has contaminated the SCOTUS just as he has other once respected American traditions and institutions. And all just to satisfy his own personal narcissism

 

[Diogenes]

Probably not, you might find something regarding how I think it will turn out, but no editorializing on what I think should happen

It is a deposit bet they are going to bounce it back to the lower courts for further definitions to insure Trump can’t face trial prior to November Interesting how they supposedly follow Originalism, where here there is zero mention of Presidential immunity in the Constitution nor writings of the Founding Fathers, a variable they have shelved here. And Textualism, which scribes they are suppose to deal with what is infront of them now and not concern themselves with supposed effect on the future they expressed in their questions What is going to be interesting is the gun case also waiting their decision, if one guilty of spousal abuse should be allowed to access a gun. Based on all their prior gun decisions it should be a no brained for them, but they know if they rule yes it could cost Trump some suburban women vote, so don’t be surprised if they vote yes guns can be restricted under those circumstances

 

[Diogenes]

What do we know about freelance journalist Juan Alberto Vázquez?