Peter Doocy (stupid SOB) should ask Pedodent Brandon about his child molesting

The Space Invader in action; how can anyone deny what they can plainly see?

iu
 
This does NOT look like normal behavior to me

iu

Has the Space Invader stopped doing shit like this, or has the DEMOCRAT-infested media just stopped asking him about it?

It's creepy as hell.
 
Invading personal spaces is uncomfortable and can be creepy as hell. But is it illegal? All they have to do is tell Biden to fuck off.
 
Doesn't anyone else see the irony of Biden calling anyone stupid. Thee man is an idiot. He called Huter the "smartest man he knows" for God's sake. :laugh:
 
Oh my Bad. It's believe all Democrat women. Well Tara is a Democrat. So it must be believe all Democrat women unless the assaulter is a Democrat!.

Now you're catching on.

In the midst of the DEMOCRATS’ campaign to deny Brett Kavanaugh confirmation to the Supreme Court, Lawfare’s editor in chief, Benjamin Wittes, took to the pages of The Atlantic to argue that traditional concepts of due process were not applicable under the circumstances.

Justice, he wrote, was merely an “optical” consideration, and in this case, “Kavanaugh himself bears the burden of proof.”

This upending of liberal ideals had nothing to do with the veracity of Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations — opaque, decades old, and unprovable — and everything to do with the accused party, upon whom, Wittes noted, we were about to “bestow an immense honor that comes with great power.”

We don’t know if, in 1993, Joe Biden sexually assaulted a woman named Tara Reade by pressing her up against a wall and digitally penetrating her without her consent.

But under Wittes’s standard, it shouldn’t matter.

Indeed, that we do not know is all that we need to know. No person in America is accorded a more “immense honor” or more “great power” than the president.

Surely, as with Kavanaugh, the existence of the accusation is disqualifying?

Apparently not, for ideals of justice seem to be quite malleable these days.

Journalistic norms, too.

The same media that relayed every unsubstantiated and tawdry rumor during the Kavanaugh confirmation, and that happily transmitted the Michael Avenatti–produced gang-rape smear, treated Reade’s story quite differently.

Why, we might ask, didn’t Reade receive the same coverage as E. Jean Carroll, a woman who accused President Trump of assaulting her in 1995 or 1996 at a Bergdorf Goodman store in Manhattan?

Virtually every major news organization let Carroll tell her story.

Reade has been trying to tell hers for decades. Believe women?

Indeed, to understand how to proceed, the media had only to take the advice of Biden himself, who three years ago argued that society had an obligation to presume that women who come forward with allegations of sexual assault should be believed irrespective of how flimsy that accusation may be: "For a woman to come forward in the glaring lights of focus, nationally, you’ve got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she’s talking about is real, whether or not she forgets facts, whether or not it’s been made worse or better over time".


https://dnyuz.com/2020/03/27/joe-biden-tara-reade-sexual-assault-hypocrisy/
 
Careful. We do not play with 12b.

It’s a legitimate question. He starts multiple threads weekly, I assume his stuff is okay because he’s having an ‘objective’ discussion about it. But why multiple threads? Why the obsession. I’m on loose footing for asking that when a poster creates thread after thread on the same topic? Your call but I’d like your reasoning in why my question isn’t fair and ‘objective’. Lay it in me.
 
It’s a legitimate question. He starts multiple threads weekly, I assume his stuff is okay because he’s having an ‘objective’ discussion about it. But why multiple threads? Why the obsession. I’m on loose footing for asking that when a poster creates thread after thread on the same topic? Your call but I’d like your reasoning in why my question isn’t fair and ‘objective’. Lay it in me.

I warned you, it is simply against the rules to even ask the question about a member here. However "legitimate" you may think it is. If you believe there is evidence of anything like that contact local authorities and leave it off the board. It is simple as that. Next time. I have warned you three times now, this is the absolute last. I have shown patience we do not normally show for this particular rule.
 
I warned you, it is simply against the rules to even ask the question about a member here. However "legitimate" you may think it is. If you believe there is evidence of anything like that contact local authorities and leave it off the board. It is simple as that. Next time. I have warned you three times now, this is the absolute last. I have shown patience we do not normally show for this particular rule.

Really? Why the fuck don't you show me the other two, pal. That's fucking bullshit. YOU created this mess because you are a coward and won't stop the bullshit. I guess it would be so horrible here if Legion wasn't able to start these threads. That's apparently what you're afraid of. I guess if I say Legion is obsessed with Biden it must mean I'm accusing him of being a Biden supporter, right? LOL at you. Have it your way. Maybe you could add a feature so we don't have to look at these garbage threads day in and day out. What a sad excuse for a moderator. Have fun allowing the pedophile bait. Sure makes this a great board.
 
Maybe you could add a feature so we don't have to look at these garbage threads day in and day out. What a sad excuse for a moderator.

I suggested that a few times long time ago. Pretty tiring to see the same shit being spammed on first page.
 
I guess it would be so horrible here if Legion wasn't able to start these threads. Maybe you could add a feature so we don't have to look at these garbage threads day in and day out.

It's not my thread, so I didn't start it, and the forum has a function called Ignore.

Use it, or quit whining. I don't care which.
 
Back
Top