Petulant Childish Righties

[Sammy Jankis]

And France isn’t Germany. And Holland isn’t Cuba.

Universal medical has been shown to work across the board. No exceptions. Not one.

Land size. Population. Wealth. Form of government…….It doesn’t matter. It works everywhere. It’s been proven everywhere. No exceptions.



And adjustments will be made. The average country spends half of what the US spends, per capita. Imagine if they doubled their budget and spent the equivalent of the US. Twice as many doctors and nurses and hospitals and …..

Countries with government medical have been belly-aching for years and years and years, however, the citizens have benefited for 30 or 40 or 50 years. Not bad for something that doesn’t work.



The costs can be addressed by having a universal plan but we all know who’s stopping that. However, as time passes a universal plan will be brought into force because not one country with a universal plan ever reverted to the archaic “pay or suffer” system. Not one.

Once the citizens actually see the benefits, live them, experience them, there will be a rush to have a universal plan. No wonder the Repubs are panicking. As soon as the citizens find out the truth a lot of the bozos will be out of a job.

How do I know? I know because not one country on the entire planet ever reverted to the "pay or suffer" system and every country started out with one. Once the people see the benefits the Repub party will be standing in the unemployment line.


////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

It depends on how you define "working". Many people don't consider letting old people die a valid costcutter. Rationing and death panels is the ugly downside that gets swept under the rug.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Bottom Line, never trust your healthcare to population control freaks bent on democide, or social justice freaks who hate your nation racially.

What if they combine the affirmatic action agenda with healthcare. Kill whitey can be an operational reality for the revolutionary holocaust.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

First you said:



And a public that doesn't pay as much attention is a less informed public...

...

But that sure sounds like you are saying they don't want the public to know about the vote...



Like I said earlier... a public that doesn't pay as much attention is a less informed public...hence you are implying that is the reason they held the vote on Sunday...so fewer people might know



There you go...I know you will continue to deny everything but hey, at least everyone can see the cute little semantic word games you are trying to play.

You truly are a fucking moron. Saying they want to pass the vote at a time that the public is less likely to be paying attention is not the same as saying they 'don't want them to KNOW about the vote'. Again, if you believe that the public pays as much attention to the 11:00 Sunday night news as they do the Weekday news, you should let the networks know. Because they would be ever so happy to find that out.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Yeah. Rationing and death panels for everybody!


The U.S. Government, guaranteeing your right to die with dignity, in perpetuity!

 

[zappasguitar]

You truly are a fucking moron. Saying they want to pass the vote at a time that the public is less likely to be paying attention is not the same as saying they 'don't want them to KNOW about the vote'. Again, if you believe that the public pays as much attention to the 11:00 Sunday night news as they do the Weekday news, you should let the networks know. Because they would be ever so happy to find that out.

I knew you wouldn't be able to admit you'd misspoken, no problem...you'll grow up one day and then we'll be able to have an adult conversation.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

I knew you wouldn't be able to admit you'd misspoken, no problem...you'll grow up one day and then we'll be able to have an adult conversation.

Well moron, that is because I did not. You continue to claim the two are the same thing. Yet they are not. That simply displays what I stated... that you are a fucking moron.

Unless you would care to explain how it is those two are the same. My words are here for anyone to read. You clearly read into what I wrote and are now pretending they are the same for the sake of trying to save face.

 

[zappasguitar]

You truly are a fucking moron. Saying they want to pass the vote at a time that the public is less likely to be paying attention is not the same as saying they 'don't want them to KNOW about the vote'. Again, if you believe that the public pays as much attention to the 11:00 Sunday night news as they do the Weekday news, you should let the networks know. Because they would be ever so happy to find that out.

And WHY would Democrats want to hold a vote when the public is less likely to be paying attention?

Keep on spinning...

 

[apple0154]

It depends on how you define "working". Many people don't consider letting old people die a valid costcutter. Rationing and death panels is the ugly downside that gets swept under the rug.

Which is exactly what insurance companies do, not governments.

One of the stipulations in the HCR is insurance companies can not have annual limits which means they do/did have them. Find one country that has annual limits on their health care. The idea is absurd.

 

[apple0154]

Bottom Line, never trust your healthcare to population control freaks bent on democide, or social justice freaks who hate your nation racially.

What if they combine the affirmatic action agenda with healthcare. Kill whitey can be an operational reality for the revolutionary holocaust.

AHAHAHAHAHAH You don't have to worry. Everyone loves the court jester.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

And WHY would Democrats want to hold a vote when the public is less likely to be paying attention?

Keep on spinning...

Again twit... try READING and then COMPREHENDING what you read. I have already stated WHY they would hold a late Sunday night vote.

Now tell me.... WHY would the Dems want to hold a vote late on a Sunday night rather than simply voting on the bill during the work week? What was their rush that they HAD to do it late Sunday night? There is NO time critical component in the bill that would have altered its effect by passing it Sunday rather than Monday.

So again... quit being such a coward and tell us WHY would the Dems vote on Sunday night? Do you have just ONE valid reason? Or are you going to continue burying your head in the sand while shouting what your masters tell you to?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

And WHY would Democrats want to hold a vote when the public is less likely to be paying attention?

Keep on spinning...

and YES.... we did notice how you once again refused to demonstrate how those two are the 'SAME'. Typical of someone who long ago lost this debate.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Which is exactly what insurance companies do, not governments.

One of the stipulations in the HCR is insurance companies can not have annual limits which means they do/did have them. Find one country that has annual limits on their health care. The idea is absurd.

No. governments do it when they take over the healthcare.

The death panels decide which procedures are allowed and who gets them. To do this they consider a person's value to society.

 

[zappasguitar]

And WHY would Democrats want to hold a vote when the public is less likely to be paying attention?

Keep on spinning...

I THOUGHT it was a pretty simple question...only two words with more than two syllables...BUT, maybe I was giving you too much credit.

Let's try one more time...

WHY would Democrats want to hold a vote when the public less less likely to be paying attention?

 

[apple0154]

No. governments do it when they take over the healthcare.

The death panels decide which procedures are allowed and who gets them. To do this they consider a person's value to society.

Where did you ever get such a strange idea?

Oh, I know. You're thinking of insurance companies.

Why do you think Obama stipulated insurance companies can no longer have annual limits? It's because governments don't place annual limits on individuals.

Research, my comical friend.

 

[zappasguitar]

I THOUGHT it was a pretty simple question...only two words with more than two syllables...BUT, maybe I was giving you too much credit.

Let's try one more time...

WHY would Democrats want to hold a vote when the public less less likely to be paying attention?

That's right...just ignore what you can't answer.

Actually, "WON'T" answer is a more accurate description.

You WON'T answer because doing so would prove you were wrong and I was right...

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

I THOUGHT it was a pretty simple question...only two words with more than two syllables...BUT, maybe I was giving you too much credit.

Let's try one more time...

WHY would Democrats want to hold a vote when the public less less likely to be paying attention?

It is a simple question. One that has already been addressed on this thread.

 

[zappasguitar]

It is a simple question. One that has already been addressed on this thread.

Humor an old man...refresh my memory.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Humor an old man...refresh my memory.

Fine. But do try to actually comprehend what you read this time.

The reason they do it on the weekend is the same reason companies try to announce their 'not so good' news over the weekend..... People are less likely to pay attention to the news cycle on the weekend. ESPECIALLY on a Sunday night at 11:00 vs. Say on a Monday where it would hit the 5:00 news.

While the public is still going to find out what happened, the response time is typically delayed providing the spin masters time to weave their web of deceit.

Do notice how fast Lord Obama was out on college campuses with his fear tactics. 'oh, the Republicans want to repeal this? Go for it. Tell little suzie why her mom doesn't get free health care, tell small businesses why they don't get tax credits.... blah blah blah'

It is done on the weekends for the spin effect or in an attempt to minimize damage.... not too many people were up debating the merits of what took place at 12:00am Monday morning.

That said.... can you provide any valid reason for why they would hold the vote Sunday night vs. Monday? What possible benefit would it provide in doing so? Why the rush?

 

[leaningright]

I couldn't be a rep.....I refuse to work on Sunday.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Fine. But do try to actually comprehend what you read this time.

The reason they do it on the weekend is the same reason companies try to announce their 'not so good' news over the weekend..... People are less likely to pay attention to the news cycle on the weekend. ESPECIALLY on a Sunday night at 11:00 vs. Say on a Monday where it would hit the 5:00 news.

While the public is still going to find out what happened, the response time is typically delayed providing the spin masters time to weave their web of deceit.

Do notice how fast Lord Obama was out on college campuses with his fear tactics. 'oh, the Republicans want to repeal this? Go for it. Tell little suzie why her mom doesn't get free health care, tell small businesses why they don't get tax credits.... blah blah blah'

It is done on the weekends for the spin effect or in an attempt to minimize damage.... not too many people were up debating the merits of what took place at 12:00am Monday morning.

That said.... can you provide any valid reason for why they would hold the vote Sunday night vs. Monday? What possible benefit would it provide in doing so? Why the rush?

Uhhh hate to correct you ole boy but that trick is done on Friday nights. Not Sunday.