Photo of bloodied, broken nosed George Zimmerman released

Thing1 said:
LOL

I wonder if Damo is able to see those 2 conservatives proclaiming his innocence, of if the partisan blinders are still on.
Click to expand...
I have always said I would reserve judgment until all the evidence was in.

However the lies and attempts to smear this man, even to the point of endangering lives, put me solidly in his court. I believe him.
 
Rana said:
No, it hasn't, if he was persuing Martin, then the self defense motive is moot and it was Martin who was defending himself. I have never known someone giving you a bloody nose to be cause for lethal force.

This is hat a court of law will determine.
Click to expand...

How do you explain Martin approching Zimmerman, when Zimmerman had stopped and was retruning to his car?
 
Bijou said:
Bullshit. You believe whatever suits you. This would've been conveniently 'leaked' already, if it were real. It isn't. You go ahead and swallow whatever horseshit pleases your palate and I'll go with what is obvious.
Click to expand...

Total and complete nonsense. One more time. Read it slowly and you can likely actually comprehend it this time.

The photo was presented earlier by the prosecution, only as a photocopy of the photo... Literally made on a copy machine. This is the infamous "black and white" photo you heard Rana speak of. They literally just recently substituted the actual photo into evidence. This photo is from the prosecution, it was taken by the cops, it is from that night, it is not 'shopped.

Read it again. Rinse and repeat.
 
Thing1 said:
LOL

I wonder if Damo is able to see those 2 conservatives proclaiming his innocence, of if the partisan blinders are still on.
Click to expand...

So you are incapable of reading "with two notable exceptions in this thread" part of my post? You suck at "gotcha" politics, mostly because you don't pay attention.
 
Stargazer said:
Why? Because it is going to be justice served to the lynch mob media who smeared this man and posted lie after lie about the case.

What has transpired is absolutely abhorrent. And justice WILL be served.
Click to expand...

I don't necessarily think that we can be sure of this. Until the trial is over, we still don't have all the information. There is a reason that the prosecution filed charges and it wasn't because they thought he'd be acquitted, if it was as simple as this they would not have filed any charges as they don't like to be made to look like fools or losing their job from wasting the taxpayers money.

While I see some evidence he was defending himself that will be hard for them to get around, this is no sure thing.
 
Damocles said:
So you are incapable of reading "with two notable exceptions in this thread" part of my post? You suck at "gotcha" politics, mostly because you don't pay attention.
Click to expand...

No - I read that; I thought you were talking about the 2 OTHER righties who all said he'd be acquitted, as well.

But you're right; I'm certainly not as practiced in the "gotcha" thing as you are.
 
Damocles said:
I don't necessarily think that we can be sure of this. Until the trial is over, we still don't have all the information. There is a reason that the prosecution filed charges and it wasn't because they thought he'd be acquitted, if it was as simple as this they would not have filed any charges as they don't like to be made to look like fools or losing their job from wasting the taxpayers money..
Click to expand...

Nonsense. The prosecution DID NOT file charges because there was no evidence of a crime. After all the outcry from blacks and their supporters, the state stepped in and prosecuted the case. They would rather fail, but be seen as trying to champion the cause of the blacks, than following the law.
 
dixon76710 said:
Nonsense. The prosecution DID NOT file charges because there was no evidence of a crime. After all the outcry from blacks and their supporters, the state stepped in and prosecuted the case. They would rather fail, but be seen as trying to champion the cause of the blacks, than following the law.
Click to expand...
Nonsense. The County passed it on to the state, as they do in capital cases in FL (murder being a capital crime), and the prosecutors chose to file charges, and it wasn't because they thought they would lose. Even in politicalized cases, DAs are very wary to bring charges that they believe will result in acquittal.
 
Stargazer said:
Why? Because it is going to be justice served to the lynch mob media who smeared this man and posted lie after lie about the case.

What has transpired is absolutely abhorrent. And justice WILL be served.
Click to expand...

The man is guilty of killing an unarmed teenager. That much is not in doubt. The trial is about whether he was justified. One person is dead, one walked away with superficial injuries. You guys claim there's a lynch mob smearing GZ. I say there's a mob who smeared and continues smearing TM and he's not going to have his day in court. If you all were as impartial as you like to pretend, you wouldn't be calling the dead boy a druggie thug. So the abhorrence goes both ways. GZ will have every opportunity to smear TM's reputation, and he won't be there to defend himself. Maybe you think that's fair, but I think it's a travesty.
 
It is only a travesty because this is one more example of a kid without parents that care that is until there is money to be made.
 
christiefan915 said:
Talk about supposition. He and his father were visiting the father's fiancee. Where do you get this shit?
Click to expand...

yeah and his mother put a patent on his name before he was good and cold. The kid had not business roaming in and out of people's yards in the evening, had he been taught better judgement, he might be alive today.
 
Damocles said:
Generally incorrect.

In my experience on this board and in life most righties, with some notable exceptions, seem to have a wait and see attitude. While, every indication in this thread, and the screaming I've heard in life, shows that leftists have a "he's guilty" and not a wait for the trial attitude.

I believe that the trial will answer this question to my satisfaction. Juries get to see and hear more than I'll have, and I generally trust the system.

I think you mistake a presumption of innocence with an assurance of acquittal. You have to prove that he wasn't being attacked and that he maliciously attacked the kid. That he was never in danger... etc. I don't think it is likely he'll be convicted, there is simply too much evidence that GZ was defending himself.
Click to expand...


Damo covering for the other like minded conservative with his standard pompous bullshit.

I went back and counted the participants in this thread to see if Damo's claim was accurate...and guess what?

He wasn't even CLOSE!

Liberals participating in this thread and generally taking a Zimmerman is a murderer stance: 10

sedan- christiefan- bijou- Darla- haiku- ZappasGuitar- wiseone- thing1- Rana- and uscitizentoo


Conservatives participating in this threa and generally taking a Zimmerman is innocent/Trayvon got what he deserved stance: 15!

stargazer- conservaative- wise old man- 007- Damo- ILA- voltaire- rocketman- USF- STY- Yurt- SF- Grind- SJJS- and bravo


And we've got one who has been fairly neutral...Aoxoxoca


So we can see from the evidence right in front of us that Damo's claim that Liberals screaming "he's guilty" are more prevalent than conservatives shouting "he's innocent" is just plain balderdash.

Not that I expect the evidence to change his mind...Damo can be just a big a partisan hack as anyone here when he wants to.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Damo covering for the other like minded conservative with his standard pompous bullshit.

I went back and counted the participants in this thread to see if Damo's claim was accurate...and guess what?

He wasn't even CLOSE!

Liberals participating in this thread and generally taking a Zimmerman is a murderer stance: 10

sedan- christiefan- bijou- Darla- haiku- ZappasGuitar- wiseone- thing1- Rana- and uscitizentoo


Conservatives participating in this threa and generally taking a Zimmerman is innocent/Trayvon got what he deserved stance: 15!

stargazer- conservaative- wise old man- 007- Damo- ILA- voltaire- rocketman- USF- STY- Yurt- SF- Grind- SJJS- and bravo


And we've got one who has been fairly neutral...Aoxoxoca


So we can see from the evidence right in front of us that Damo's claim that Liberals screaming "he's guilty" are more prevalent than conservatives shouting "he's innocent" is just plain balderdash.

Not that I expect the evidence to change his mind...Damo can be just a big a partisan hack as anyone here when he wants to.
Click to expand...

Thanks for breaking it down. I just glanced back through the different pages of the thread, and it was clear he was reading everything through the usual right-wing hack prism.
 
Stargazer said:
I have always said I would reserve judgment until all the evidence was in.

However the lies and attempts to smear this man, even to the point of endangering lives, put me solidly in his court. I believe him.
Click to expand...

Of course nary a word from you to those lying and smearing Tryavon Martin's name with all the "thug" inferences and claims he was looking for trouble that night.
 
Thing1 said:
Actually, reading back through this thread, there is practically no one who has a "let's wait & see what the trial says" stance.
Click to expand...


Noticed that too, did ya?

Kind of shows precisely how full of it Damo is regarding conservatives and their supposed "wait and see" attitude.
 
Last edited:
ZappasGuitar said:
Damo covering for the other like minded conservative with his standard pompous bullshit.

I went back and counted the participants in this thread to see if Damo's claim was accurate...and guess what?

He wasn't even CLOSE!

Liberals participating in this thread and generally taking a Zimmerman is a murderer stance: 10

sedan- christiefan- bijou- Darla- haiku- ZappasGuitar- wiseone- thing1- Rana- and uscitizentoo


Conservatives participating in this threa and generally taking a Zimmerman is innocent/Trayvon got what he deserved stance: 15!

stargazer- conservaative- wise old man- 007- Damo- ILA- voltaire- rocketman- USF- STY- Yurt- SF- Grind- SJJS- and bravo


And we've got one who has been fairly neutral...Aoxoxoca


So we can see from the evidence right in front of us that Damo's claim that Liberals screaming "he's guilty" are more prevalent than conservatives shouting "he's innocent" is just plain balderdash.

Not that I expect the evidence to change his mind...Damo can be just a big a partisan hack as anyone here when he wants to.
Click to expand...

Which is pure nonsense on your part. I have not stated that Zimmerman is innocent and most certainly did not state that Trayvon 'got what he deserved'.

Thanks for again proving that you are incapable of reading comprehension.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top