Photographs from 1800’s Palestine / Israel – with no trace of ‘Palestinians’

they could call themselves shoes. that doesn't make them shoes

I get it, you anti semites have these visions in your head of poor arabs facing down jewish tanks with rocks and it seems oh so romantic to you. Fact is that they are dirty muslimes who follow the teachings of a pedophile. They should be exterminated. Anything that leads to muslime extermination I support

Facing down tanks?

Palestinian Christians and Muslims are not dirty nor do they follow a pedophile.. You sound like Hitler demonizing the Jews.

You should be ashamed.. Hitler took the homes, businesses and property of the Jews as well as their citizenship and civil rights..

Are YOU now justified?
 
Facing down tanks?

Palestinian Christians and Muslims are not dirty nor do they follow a pedophile.. You sound like Hitler demonizing the Jews.

You should be ashamed.. Hitler took the homes, businesses and property of the Jews as well as their citizenship and civil rights..

Are YOU now justified?

Listen and listen clearly

Muslimes follow the teachings of a pedophile. That is fact

Muslimes are dirty animals. I don't care if they are brown, white, yellow or pink. All muslimes are evil. The only good muslime is a dead muslime. They should be removed forcibly from the United States. They should be banned from even coming here to visit. We should do all we can to destroy them economically
 
Hypocrisy is meaningless to liberals.

But it's not "Liberals" that have this hypocrisy, it's Jews.
One of the smartest things the Jews have done is get people to think Liberals are behind Globalism, Zionism, and White Guilt. Now it's seemingly too late. Conservative cucks don't have the balls to name the Jew, so they just blame Liberals.

Yet the US will never be an ethnostate. This vast mix of peoples, however, should share a common culture: reverence of the Constitution, the ideals of the Declaration, liberty, the sanctity of life, the cultural value of property ownership, and the rule of law. Sadly, liberals do not share these values.

America is too racially mixed to be an ethnostate now, but we can carve out a region in the North-West to turn into a white ethnostate.

Assimilation is impossible when the immigrants and the majority are different races. Jews, Blacks, Mestizos, and American Indians are still not assimilated, despite being here longer than most white ethnicities.

Obviously Liberals do share those values. You're just caught up in partisan politics.
 
But it's not "Liberals" that have this hypocrisy, it's Jews.
One of the smartest things the Jews have done is get people to think Liberals are behind Globalism, Zionism, and White Guilt. Now it's seemingly too late. Conservative cucks don't have the balls to name the Jew, so they just blame Liberals.



America is too racially mixed to be an ethnostate now, but we can carve out a region in the North-West to turn into a white ethnostate.

Assimilation is impossible when the immigrants and the majority are different races. Jews, Blacks, Mestizos, and American Indians are still not assimilated, despite being here longer than most white ethnicities.

Obviously Liberals do share those values. You're just caught up in partisan politics.

No it's liberals. Warren isn't a Jew but look at her hypocrisy. Look at all the hypocrisy here with the non-jew libs.

Your dream of an American ethnostate is funny. So is your insistence that certain minorities will never assimilate, especially when I just explained to you what true American values are. You're the one who hasn't assimilated.
 
No it's liberals. Warren isn't a Jew but look at her hypocrisy. Look at all the hypocrisy here with the non-jew libs.

There are hypocrites in every group of people. However, the hypocrisy of wanting Israel to be an ethnostate, while demanding white countries accept Globalism, is generally a Jewish thing.
Most Liberals oppose Jewish Nationalism. I'm a Nationalist, but I can respect people who are at least consistent. The real hypocrisy is not having consistent standards here.
Your dream of an American ethnostate is funny. So is your insistence that certain minorities will never assimilate, especially when I just explained to you what true American values are. You're the one who hasn't assimilated.

How haven't I assimilated? I agree with those American values.

Most minorities haven't assimilated because they still see themselves as outsiders living in America, instead of as Americans.
 
There are hypocrites in every group of people. However, the hypocrisy of wanting Israel to be an ethnostate, while demanding white countries accept Globalism, is generally a Jewish thing.
Most Liberals oppose Jewish Nationalism. I'm a Nationalist, but I can respect people who are at least consistent. The real hypocrisy is not having consistent standards here.


How haven't I assimilated? I agree with those American values.

Most minorities haven't assimilated because they still see themselves as outsiders living in America, instead of as Americans.

This is the first I've heard that Jews insists that other countries accept globalism. You should go on CNN and let everyone know. :rolleyes:

It's liberals that insist on globalism; some Jews just happen to be liberal.

I know many minorities: blacks, Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, Persian- they all see themselves as Americans.

In the mid 80's I worked with a handful of Arab immigrants who saw themselves as outsiders, and they were. This was the generation that came over here to go to college and then got "stuck" because of the Shah thing back in the Carter years. Every one of them were worthless losers, whining about how their daddies couldn't send them any money and so had to work to eat, like the rest of us plebes.

I've also met several illegal immigrants, Mexicans, who saw themselves as outsiders, and of course they are, but that's a different case.
 
This is the first I've heard that Jews insists that other countries accept globalism. You should go on CNN and let everyone know. :rolleyes:

Then I'd advise you to do some research on the Jewish Question. But you won't find many people talking about this on CNN because CNN, like every major media station, is controlled by the Jewish establishment.

It's liberals that insist on globalism; some Jews just happen to be liberal.

First of all, it's not just Liberals. Conservatives are Globalist too. I'd say Conservatives are even worse in how they pathetically suck up to minorities with their "dEmS aRe ThE rEaL rAcIsTs!" cuckery.
Secondly, there was a time when both Liberals and Conservatives were Nationalist. Nationalism used to be the norm before Jews took over the media and academia.
I know many minorities: blacks, Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, Persian- they all see themselves as Americans.
Do they care about representation for their own people? Do they just so happen to self-segregate? For most minorities, the answer for both questions would be yes.
In the mid 80's I worked with a handful of Arab immigrants who saw themselves as outsiders, and they were. This was the generation that came over here to go to college and then got "stuck" because of the Shah thing back in the Carter years. Every one of them were worthless losers, whining about how their daddies couldn't send them any money and so had to work to eat, like the rest of us plebes.

I've also met several illegal immigrants, Mexicans, who saw themselves as outsiders, and of course they are, but that's a different case.

Well I don't think all non-white people are lazy or criminals. But I do accept that most of them will never be American, and will fight for their own interests at the expense of real Americans.
 
Hopefully he won't. He's doing a good job exposing the Jewish mentality here.

Population
4. According to official estimates, the population of Palestine grew from 750,000 at the census of 1922 to 1,765,000 at the end of 1944.

In this period the Jewish part of the population rose from 84,000 to 554,000, and from 13 to 31 percent of the whole. Three-fourths of this expansion of the Jewish community was accounted for by immigration.

Meanwhile the Arabs, though their proportion of the total population was falling, had increased by an even greater number-the Moslems alone from * Of this Moslem growth by 472,000, only 19,000 was accounted for by immigration. The expansion of the Arab community by natural increase has been in fact one of the most striking features of Palestine's social history under the Mandate.

5. The present density of population in Palestine is officially estimated at 179 per square mile. If the largely desert sub-district of Beersheba is excluded from the calculation, the figure is 336.

6. The Committee obtained estimates of the probable future growth of Palestine's population from Professor Notestein, Director of the Office of Population Research at Princeton University, from Dr. D. V. Glass, Research Secretary of the Population Investigation Committee in London, and in Palestine from the Commissioner for Migration and Statistics and the Government Statistician. The estimates for the non-Jewish population made by the last-named, on various hypotheses but with the constant assumption that there would be no non-Jewish immigration or emigration, ranged from 1,652,000 to 1,767,000 at the end of 1959. Professor Notestein, also assuming the absence of non-Jewish migration, extended his calculations to 1970 and arrived at a figure of 1,876,000.

The Commissioner for Migration predicted an Arab population of 1,565,000 in 1960 and 1,820,000 in 1970. The highest estimates were those of Dr. Glass, who anticipated a settled Moslem population (i. e. excluding the Christian Arabs) of 1,636,000 in 1961 and 2,204,000 in 1971. For the probable Jewish population at the end of 1959, on the supposition that no immigration occurred in the interval, the Government Statistician put forward the figure of 664,000.

7. The Jewish community, in the absence of immigration, would form a steadily diminishing proportion of the total population. This is clear from the comparative rates of natural increase, shown in the table below:

continued

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/angch04.asp
 
Back
Top