Physical materialism

It's well above my expertise, but pseudo-science will eventually fall to science. It always has, but sometimes takes awhile.

Still trying to understand consciousness, like the origin of life, is a very interesting area of research. Just as some scientists are trying to create life, creating a synthetic consciousness would be great advancement.
Agree
Legally and morally, should a synthetic consciousness have rights? Or would it be a slave to its creator?
I thought Data on Star Trek NG absolutely had natural rights and civil rights! There was a great iconic episode about that
 
The only militant atheist leaders I've seen all got rich off of bilking dumbasses just like the Televangelists.

FWIW, I've thought about starting a RWNJ TikTok show citing all sorts of wacky shit just for the beer money. RWNJs, like militant atheists, are more easily separated from their money because most are poorly educated and not that smart, or sane, to begin with. LOL
Militant Christian nationalists and MAGA morons are a target rich environment for a humorous tiktok channel (y)
 
Agree

I thought Data on Star Trek NG absolutely had natural rights and civil rights! There was a great iconic episode about that
It's been a common question in several SF novels and short stories.

Philip K. Dick's "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" which was the basis of the movie "Blade Runner" asked that question.

Robert A. Heinlein's "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" also asked the question.
 
Militant Christian nationalists and MAGA morons are a target rich environment for a humorous tiktok channel (y)
....and stupid enough to send me their money. W00t!

7c6ec1.gif
 
It's been a common question in several SF novels and short stories.

Philip K. Dick's "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" which was the basis of the movie "Blade Runner" ask that question.

Robert A. Heinlein's "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" also asked the question.
Oh, that's right. Blade Runner broached the topic. Great movie.
 
^^ Frantic Googling and plagiarism without citation.

NOpe. My own words from a series of books and science documentaries I have watched.

I'm curious why you didn't try to support you accusation.

Couldn't do it? Can't find those paragraphs in some other resource?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

I have to assume you are also a plagiarist as you always confess via accusation. I've shown you to be a frantic googler.

Do I need to do it again for everyone????

I can if you like.
 
The great thinkers, like Sagan and Einstein, never limited themselves to something as dogmatic as militant atheism. Creative people with boundless curiosity like these men never paint themselves into a corner.

Goddamn, dude, how much do you hate atheists? Why are you so dodgy about your REAL motives on here? Why lie all.the.time?
 
NOpe. My own words from a series of books and science documentaries I have watched.
These are not your own words plagiarizer, it's way too far outside of your normal syntax, word choice, and sentence structure:

Split brain patients presented with visual stimuli independently to each hemisphere of the brain forced the left hemisphere to create, out of whole cloth, reasoning for why the right hemisphere took an action (they were presented different unrelated stimuli in the form of pictures). When the brain is "split" (The corpus collosum is cut) the hemispheres no longer communicate. So the left hemisphere doesn't know what the right does and vice versa. But when presented with a stimulus on the right side that the left had no idea about the left side came up with an explanation for why this happened.
I've shown myself to be a frantic googler.
Correct
 
These are not your own words plagiarizer, it's way too far outside of your normal syntax, word choice, and sentence structure:

Split brain patients presented with visual stimuli independently to each hemisphere of the brain forced the left hemisphere to create, out of whole cloth, reasoning for why the right hemisphere took an action (they were presented different unrelated stimuli in the form of pictures). When the brain is "split" (The corpus collosum is cut) the hemispheres no longer communicate. So the left hemisphere doesn't know what the right does and vice versa. But when presented with a stimulus on the right side that the left had no idea about the left side came up with an explanation for why this happened.

Correct
Perry is not only a plagiarizer, but also a liar. I forgive him since he's clearly mentally disabled.
 
DAILY REMINDER THAT CYPRESS IS FRANTIC GOOLGER

please write in your own words, without using an AI copy/paste as a crutch

And here we go....you can click on any one of them to see the full context. You frantically google more than I eat hot food.

Google AI

Google AI

-Google AI

Google AI

Google AI is saying

- Google AI

- Google AI

Google AI

Google AI claims

Google AI

Google AI summary

This is what Google AI says

According to Google AI,

Google AI.

According to Google AI,

Google AI:


Google AI


Google AI[/I]

According to Google AI,

Google AI

According to Google AI

Google AI has the same interpretation of "wetness" that I had, despite Perry's attempt to link it to some jargon from a chemistry textbook.

Google AI:


data source: Google AI
 
DAILY REMINDER THAT CYPRESS IS FRANTIC GOOLGER



And here we go....you can click on any one of them to see the full context. You frantically google more than I eat hot food.
QED on the childlike obsession. Sad when boys grow up without a daddy.

Is it possible you're my son, Perry? Did your mom like airshows and have a pilot fetish about 30-40 years ago?
 
Back
Top