Piers Morgan: Meghan and Harry are repulsive narcissistic hypocrites

Harry and Meghan are certainly at the top of my list of concerns right now.

Pop culture is the main tenet of reality for so many Americans that the republic is collapsing from neglect.
 
My man, YOU made a statement, and I provided just one item of proof to the contrary. Don't get your knickers in a twist because facts don't line up with your opinion.
Remember, I said racism is on a different level in the UK from America ... but guaranteed it's all too familiar and similar to the recipients. And your experiences may differ from mine, but I don't and won't dismiss them off hand, depending on context and such. To further my point:

https://www.hivelearning.com/site/resource/diversity-inclusion/racism-in-uk-vs-us/

Like the man says though not the same, there are disturbing parallels, your sarcasm non-withstanding.

No no. You're confusing the facts.

I asked (that's not a statement fyi): Race is less an issue in the US than it is in England?

You responded (and I still don't know why because I wasn't talking to you): Really? Hmmm?

Rights experts condemn UK racism report attempting to ‘normalize white supremacy’

https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/04/1090032

Then I said: I still think it's less a force in the UK than it is in the US.

To which you responded: Not so much less, just different.

I said: If neither of us has sources readily available, then I suppose it's rather a matter of subjective opinion, isn't it?

You said: Not really. There is material to read, official reports ( I linked one from the UN the other day). Also, I had the privilege of knowing for a few years Brits of various caste, class and ethnicity when I was in college and during my early job career in NYC.

Then you said: Yes, really. That UN report said there is racism in the UK. Ground breaking research, I tell you. It makes no comparison to racism in the US whatsoever. I have anecdotes too. I'm not offering some people that I knew for a few years as proof of anything.

So to be very clear, no, I didn't make a statement. You interrupted an exchange between myself and another poster with a drive-by, throwaway link that didn't do anything close to what you think you did. You added in an irrelevant anecdote for good measure. Your "facts" are merely your opinion, so be very careful about projecting your shortcomings on me.

As far as the second link you provided, all it does is prove my point: Personal accounts and statistics suggest that even if things have improved, and even if police brutality isn’t “as bad” as the other side of the Atlantic, the UK still has plenty of work to do in addressing its racism.

In any event, racism of any kind in any amount is unacceptable, so it's not a very important distinction anyway.
 
The Whine Fest is a huge fail. Boring and nothing but wah wah wah. They ask to be "left alone" and then make a Netflix doc.

Opportunist hypocrites. Diana is rolling in her grave for sure.

You're such a classless twat. Why don't you go whine about COVID vaccines in Florida? :laugh:
 
No no. You're confusing the facts.

I asked (that's not a statement fyi): Race is less an issue in the US than it is in England?

You responded (and I still don't know why because I wasn't talking to you): Really? Hmmm?

Rights experts condemn UK racism report attempting to ‘normalize white supremacy’

https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/04/1090032

Then I said: I still think it's less a force in the UK than it is in the US.

To which you responded: Not so much less, just different.

I said: If neither of us has sources readily available, then I suppose it's rather a matter of subjective opinion, isn't it?

You said: Not really. There is material to read, official reports ( I linked one from the UN the other day). Also, I had the privilege of knowing for a few years Brits of various caste, class and ethnicity when I was in college and during my early job career in NYC.

Then you said: Yes, really. That UN report said there is racism in the UK. Ground breaking research, I tell you. It makes no comparison to racism in the US whatsoever. I have anecdotes too. I'm not offering some people that I knew for a few years as proof of anything.

So to be very clear, no, I didn't make a statement. You interrupted an exchange between myself and another poster with a drive-by, throwaway link that didn't do anything close to what you think you did. You added in an irrelevant anecdote for good measure. Your "facts" are merely your opinion, so be very careful about projecting your shortcomings on me.

As far as the second link you provided, all it does is prove my point: Personal accounts and statistics suggest that even if things have improved, and even if police brutality isn’t “as bad” as the other side of the Atlantic, the UK still has plenty of work to do in addressing its racism.

In any event, racism of any kind in any amount is unacceptable, so it's not a very important distinction anyway.

All you've done is just waste time and space repeating the chronology of the posts .... and essentially just being insipidly stuborn.

What part of "not so much less, than just different" don't you understand? The gentleman in the second link confirms this by pointing out the differences and degrees of such, but a similarity as to the nature of the offenses and crimes. What YOU can't/won't accept is a black man in England pointing out the types of nastiness (unequal arrests, abuse, the occasional death) that are all too similar "across the pond". This coincides with the UN report. TFB if you don't like the implications and ramifications of such. Like I previously said, the recipients of such treatment know all too well the shared pain and frustration when all is said and done. Why the hell do you think BLM took hold in England? It ain't just a social trend, but a social problem that England is just as guilty of as the USA.

Folk like you have what have this subconscious superior attitude when it comes to America ... a knee jerk reaction when someone dares to point out similar negative aspect. That is why you asked your initial question, the implication all to clear. Tough...grow up and get over it.

And also as the chronology of the posts shows, I clearly made the distinction between a generalized personal account and fact based documentation...I used the latter to demonstrate my accounts weren't just based on supposition and conjecture.

Now I'm sure you'll just repeat your screed in some variation. The objective reader will see your folly (or hang up, or whatever you want to call it). If so, you can have the last attempted condescening word. If not, then we can discuss. Carry on.
 
Last edited:
All you've done is just waste time and space repeating the chronology of the posts .... and essentially just being insipidly stuborn.

What part of "not so much less, than just different" don't you understand? The gentleman in the second link confirms this by pointing out the differences and degrees of such, but a similarity as to the nature of the offenses and crimes. What YOU can't/won't accept is a black man in England pointing out the types of nastiness (unequal arrests, abuse, the occasional death) that are all too similar "across the pond". This coincides with the UN report. TFB if you don't like the implications and ramifications of such. Like I previously said, the recipients of such treatment know all too well the shared pain and frustration when all is said and done. Why the hell do you think BLM to hold in England. It ain't just a social trend, but a social problem that England is just as guilty of as the USA.

Folk like you have what have this subconscious superior attitude when it comes to America ... a knee jerk reaction when someone dares to point out similar negative aspect. That is why you asked your initial question, the implication all to clear. Tough...grow up and get over it.

And also as the chronology of the posts shows, I clearly made the distinction between a generalized personal account and fact based documentation...I used the latter to demonstrate my accounts weren't just based on supposition and conjecture.

Now I'm sure you'll just repeat your screed in some variation. The objective reader will see your folly (or hang up, or whatever you want to call it). If so, you can have the last attempted condescening word. If not, then we can discuss. Carry on.

You have a nasty habit of capitalizing the word "you" and then accusing other people of a bunch of bullshit you invented in your mind.

Once again, all you've presented is an opinion, and yours is becoming increasingly easy to disregard. Racism exists in the UK. Congratulations. You should win some sort of award for that breakthrough observation.

I don't know who you're thinking of when you make such a lazy and yet another accusation as American superiority. It surely isn't me. My point is that racism is worse in the US than it is in the UK. You think that I'm bragging about the US's "superior" racism? Get fucked.

You don't know why I asked my initial question because you just made yourself look like an imbecile. I was asking a different poster to clarify one of their statements. That's when you stumbled into the room and started yapping like a chihuahua that needs to be punted across a parking lot about a conversation you didn't understand. Grow up and get out.
 
People welcomed her with open arms, but it soon became apparent that she wanted the trappings of wealth and the adulation without actually doing anything. Harry is too weak to say no to her sadly, still William is a good 'un who will make an excellent king as will Catherine an excellent queen. People in the UK just wish that Ginger and Whinger would shut the fuck up and just disappear.

This doesn't look like being welcomed with open arms.

EZhYGmNXgAEmKf2



From the Daily Fail:

EXCLUSIVE: Harry's girl is (almost) straight outta Compton: Gang-scarred home of her mother revealed - so will he be dropping by for tea?
 
This doesn't look like being welcomed with open arms.

EZhYGmNXgAEmKf2



From the Daily Fail:

EXCLUSIVE: Harry's girl is (almost) straight outta Compton: Gang-scarred home of her mother revealed - so will he be dropping by for tea?

Do you know the definition of welcome? Harry met her in 2016, your tabloid pics come way way way after that.
 
Last edited:
Do you know the definition of welcome? Harry met her in 2016, your tabloid pics come way way way after that.

The tabloids started this before they were even engaged.

"Just days after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle first went public with their relationship, one MailOnline headline declared "Harry's Girl Is (Almost) Straight Outta Compton." While another, on The Daily Star, asked if Harry would "Marry Into Gangster Royalty?"

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a40979176/meghan-markle-compton-comments/
 
The tabloids started this before they were even engaged.

"Just days after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle first went public with their relationship, one MailOnline headline declared "Harry's Girl Is (Almost) Straight Outta Compton." While another, on The Daily Star, asked if Harry would "Marry Into Gangster Royalty?"

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a40979176/meghan-markle-compton-comments/

If you are going to provide a link at least ensure that it doesn't return a 403 forbidden error message.

Screenshot_20221215_073739.jpg
 
The tabloids started this before they were even engaged.

"Just days after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle first went public with their relationship, one MailOnline headline declared "Harry's Girl Is (Almost) Straight Outta Compton." While another, on The Daily Star, asked if Harry would "Marry Into Gangster Royalty?"

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a40979176/meghan-markle-compton-comments/

If you are going to provide a link at least ensure that it doesn't return a 403 error message. Looks like you have a subscription to that magazine!

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20221215_073739.jpg
    Screenshot_20221215_073739.jpg
    81.8 KB · Views: 10
Last edited:
The tabloids started this before they were even engaged.

"Just days after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle first went public with their relationship, one MailOnline headline declared "Harry's Girl Is (Almost) Straight Outta Compton." While another, on The Daily Star, asked if Harry would "Marry Into Gangster Royalty?"

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a40979176/meghan-markle-compton-comments/

You should get a job with Raw Sewage.
 
You have a nasty habit of capitalizing the word "you" and then accusing other people of a bunch of bullshit you invented in your mind.

Once again, all you've presented is an opinion, and yours is becoming increasingly easy to disregard. Racism exists in the UK. Congratulations. You should win some sort of award for that breakthrough observation.

I don't know who you're thinking of when you make such a lazy and yet another accusation as American superiority. It surely isn't me. My point is that racism is worse in the US than it is in the UK. You think that I'm bragging about the US's "superior" racism? Get fucked.

You don't know why I asked my initial question because you just made yourself look like an imbecile. I was asking a different poster to clarify one of their statements. That's when you stumbled into the room and started yapping like a chihuahua that needs to be punted across a parking lot about a conversation you didn't understand. Grow up and get out.

Sorry son, but the chronology of the posts shows what YOU DID SAY. If you mean something other than what you write, then you should take the time to get it together before you type.

Now how in the hell YOU INTERPRET ANYTHING WROTE as some sort of advocation of "American superiority" is beyond rationality and reason. Clearly, you suffer from the mental attitude that I previously described...trying to project it onto me just won't cut it to the objective reader. Add to that your further absurd misinterpretations (accidental or on purpose) of what I wrote and clearly I hit a nerve, because all things were cool on Post #152 & #153 until you got all huffy afterwards.

Bottom line: you post, you run the risk of being critically analyzed, question or disagreed with. If that is too much for you, then don't post. Since we both agree that racism and bigotry are inexcusable in any form, I'll leave it at that and leave the chronology of the posts for the reading audience to assess. Moving on now.
 
Last edited:

I lived in England back then, the coverage by the tabloids was overwhelmingly positive indeed gushing would best describe it. Anyway I refuse to get into a game of tabloid Russian roulette with you. You carry right on believing whatever you like, although I will ask you this though. If the royals were so waycist and hateful, as you seem to be saying, why did they pay for a wedding reputed to cost over £18 million and gave her a title as well.
 
I lived in England back then, the coverage by the tabloids was overwhelmingly positive indeed gushing would best describe it. Anyway I refuse to get into a game of tabloid Russian roulette with you. You carry right on believing whatever you like, although I will ask you this though. If the royals were so waycist and hateful, as you seem to be saying, why did they pay for a wedding reputed to cost over £18 million and gave her a title as well.

Shut Up.....you are interfering with the rewriting of history!
 
Just to clarify, when I posted, "go kiss trump's ass some more", I was referring to Morgan, not you. You do know that Morgan is a huge trump fan because trump had him on his TV show?

Ok, I understand. My opinion of him went up enormously when he walked out of the morning show Good Morning Britain, on a point of principle.

 
Ok, I understand. My opinion of him went up enormously when he walked out of the morning show Good Morning Britain, on a point of principle.


Interesting....Morgan suddenly rates with you because he parrots the same bigoted tabloid blather you agree with.

You're pathetic.
 
Back
Top