cancel2 2022
Canceled
I lived in England back then, the coverage by the tabloids was overwhelmingly positive indeed gushing would best describe it. Anyway I refuse to get into a game of tabloid Russian roulette with you. You carry right on believing whatever you like, although I will ask you this though. If the royals were so waycist and hateful, as you seem to be saying, why did they pay for a wedding reputed to cost over £18 million and gave her a title as well.
The Press, especially your personal bête noire, gave Harry, Meghan, William and Kate the label the Fab Four. Somehow I doubt that you knew that as it doesn't fit in with the narrative you are spinning.
When Meghan arrived with her Hollywood glamour the threesome became the Fab Four, as popular as any pop group but dusted with the magic of royalty.
But now with the news that the brothers are to set up their separate households there is a parting of the ways. Many will seize on the split as evidence of a so-called froideur not just between the sisters-in-law but also between William and Harry.
In fact, the ending of a double act which has not only helped bring stability to the monarchy but showered it with popularity has been inevitable from the moment it was announced that the Duchess of Sussex was pregnant.
The creation of separate courts reflects the boys’ changing responsibilities. It is the clearest sign yet that William is destined for the throne and thus inevitably pushing his brother to the margins of royal life.
It happens to every generation. Nearly 40 years ago, it happened to Prince Andrew. For the first 22 years of his life, he was a heartbeat away from the crown as next in line after his brother Prince Charles.
Then, when the Prince and Princess of Wales began their family, his importance receded. By the time Andrew married and had children, he had been relegated down the line of succession.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/...-Prince-Harry-William-writes-RICHARD-KAY.html