Do you believe that Elizabeth Warren did know know what effects putting Native American or American Indian would have on her application forms?
If this is what you claim she is a very stupid and naive person.
Pocahontas
- Thread starter Cancel 2020.1
- Start date
Do you believe that Elizabeth Warren did know know what effects putting Native American or American Indian would have on her application forms?
If this is what you claim she is a very stupid and naive person.
cawacko
Well-known member
So it doesn't bother you when white people lie about their background and take a position that was targeted for a person of color?
She absolutely admitted having a separate server was a mistake... Ill have to find you the link. Man, you are blind!
right whatever you say is politically correct, and therefore logically correct
(though you can take potshots and not engage)..And I'm supposed to Give a Fuck?? You got nothin'....except this stupidity. "'I hate women"
there is only a smidgen of truth in what you write, and even there you get it wrong:
completely missing the idea that Hillary has very high negatives and has been shown to be arrogance of power/warmonger/liar.
Why would any SANE PERSON support this woman?
Obviously you do because she is a woman...which is prima facie stupid. Congrats. continue your worthless ad homs.
cawacko
Well-known member
Yeah, I know what she said and the context in how she said it.
It bothers me when an orange person does it.
Apologized and admitted it was a mistake! Not good enough for you?
did she put native american in her application forms?
did Harvard go out of their way to put the native american description next to her name in what looks like an effort to prove they are diverse?
Do you expect Harvard or any employer to say "yes we only hired her because she was black/brown/native american"?
This is exactly like the email server of Clinton. Can you make the case its legal yes, though in this case it might not be as the tribe she is supposed to have belong to has said that she does not belong to them. Does it look like someone is trying to game the affirmative action system? Yes.
If elizabeth warren were smart as you claim she would know the effects of putting that on your application forms and would have put something else to prevent any undue advantage being given to her.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
there's a problem here and it lies with you and partisan hacks like you......from both sides. the whole 'better to ask forgiveness that permission' is taken to a whole new level in politics, yet you clowns let it slide with barely an admonishment because it's preferable to have party and ideology over character and integrity.
If you think that this shows integrity on her part, you're dumber that the trump supporters who actually believe trump is going to make america great again.
Private server was not "legal",it's not "approved" and the other garbage language the Clintonistas use to defend her malfeasance as Sec of State.
Also note the other Sec's of State cooperated with the State IG - which Clinton would not do.. (because she's 'special')
Also note the other Sec's of State cooperated with the State IG - which Clinton would not do.. (because she's 'special')
here's POLITICO. I won't use NationalReview
++
Secretary Clinton should have preserved any Federal records she created and received on her personal account by printing and filing those records with the related files in the Office of the Secretary,” the report states. “At a minimum, Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department business before leaving government service and, because she did not do so, she did not comply with the Department’s policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act."
The report also notes that she had an "obligation to discuss using her personal email account" but did not get permission from the people who would have needed to approve the technology, who said they would not have done so, if they had been asked.
"According to the current [chief information officer] and assistant secretary for diplomatic security, Secretary Clinton had an obligation to discuss using her personal email account to conduct official business with their offices, who in turn would have attempted to provide her with approved and secured means that met her business needs," the report reads. "However, according to these officials, [the relevant people] did not — and would not — approve her exclusive reliance on a personal email."
The watchdog also "found no evidence that the Secretary requested or obtained guidance or approval to conduct official business via a personal email account on her private server."
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/hillary-clinton-email-inspector-general-report-223553
The report represents the latest pushback — in this case by a nonpartisan government entity — against her campaign’s claim that she did not break any rules and that her use of a private server was completely allowed.
Look, I don't like what she did. It was arrogant and an abuse of power. It was not criminal and the overreaching by the Republicans is hurting their case. I wish someone else had won the Democratic nomination, for a lot of reasons. The point is however... she is less of a liar and a crook than Dangerous Donald, and she does not have a self esteem problem that allows others to provoke her into flame wars that could turn real.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
so maybe you can explain your own lack of character and integrity by espousing your intention to vote for clinton instead of a 3rd party candidate?
Federal Records act: National Archives Regulations are covered here: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/414835/did-hillary-commit-felony-shannen-coffin
what Clinton is claiming ( and what the State IG is pushing back on) is that even though she did not archive her Emails -
the fact they were sent to another US gov. employees satisfies the record keeping ( such is her usual twisted logic)
So the IG has thrown out that 'reasoning' by her, but only the FBI can say if it was criminal (recommend indictment)
Because I think its important to keep Dangerous Donald out of the White House.