Police report slams killer of Trayvon Martin

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
What is very hard to do in any reasonable way is look at the files and agree that there was nothing for the legal system to work with here—no basis for an arrest.

Early on, a Sanford police investigator concluded that Zimmerman should have been charged with negligent manslaughter, because, if he had listened to what he was told on the phone and “remained in his vehicle,” or simply approached Martin in a different way, the shooting was “ultimately avoidable.”

The new evidence does not explain why Zimmerman wasn’t charged with that or with anything
Isn't his father a judge or something?
 
Like the true statist you are, of course it is. your motto is 'don't get involved, let the government do it'. ever notice how badly that works out for people? oh, no you don't. you think it's bloody marvelous that the gov fucks peoples lives to make you 'feel' safer.

One apparently innocent human would still be alive had Zimmerman let the police handle it. As they told him to.
 
One apparently innocent human would still be alive had Zimmerman let the police handle it. As they told him to.




George Zimmerman seemed quick to call the police.

Over the course of nearly eight years, Zimmerman made at least 46 911 and non-emergency calls to the police department in Sanford, Florida...

Taken together, the police log of Zimmerman’s calls paint a picture of an extremely vigilant neighbor.

Zimmerman’s calls increasingly focused on what he considered “suspicious” characters walking around the neighborhood—almost all of whom were young black males.

On April 22, 2011, Zimmerman called to report a black male about “7-9” years old, four feet tall, with a “skinny build” and short black hair.

There is no indication in the police report of the reason for Zimmerman’s suspicion of the boy.

On Aug. 3 of last year, Zimmerman reported a black male who he believed was “involved in recent” burglaries in the neighborhood.

And on Oct. 1 he reported two black male suspects “20-30” years old, in a white Chevrolet Impala.

He told police he did “not recognize” the men or their vehicle and that he was concerned because of the recent burglaries.





http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/23/did-trayvon-shooter-abuse-911.html



 
Zimmerman had no business being armed, no business chasing anyone, and no business profiling Blacks.
 
Zimmerman had no business being armed, no business chasing anyone, and no business profiling Blacks.

cite the law that he can't be armed. cite the law that says he can't follow anyone. cite the facts that show he profiled blacks.

let me guess....legion troll will never back up his claims.
 
What is very hard to do in any reasonable way is look at the files and agree that there was nothing for the legal system to work with here—no basis for an arrest.

Early on, a Sanford police investigator concluded that Zimmerman should have been charged with negligent manslaughter, because, if he had listened to what he was told on the phone and “remained in his vehicle,” or simply approached Martin in a different way, the shooting was “ultimately avoidable.”

The new evidence does not explain why Zimmerman wasn’t charged with that or with anything

Because he wasn't told to stay in his vehicle, so the entire premiss is full of fail.
OH, and you also. :)
 
George Zimmerman seemed quick to call the police.

Over the course of nearly eight years, Zimmerman made at least 46 911 and non-emergency calls to the police department in Sanford, Florida...

Taken together, the police log of Zimmerman’s calls paint a picture of an extremely vigilant neighbor.

Zimmerman’s calls increasingly focused on what he considered “suspicious” characters walking around the neighborhood—almost all of whom were young black males.

On April 22, 2011, Zimmerman called to report a black male about “7-9” years old, four feet tall, with a “skinny build” and short black hair.

There is no indication in the police report of the reason for Zimmerman’s suspicion of the boy.

On Aug. 3 of last year, Zimmerman reported a black male who he believed was “involved in recent” burglaries in the neighborhood.

And on Oct. 1 he reported two black male suspects “20-30” years old, in a white Chevrolet Impala.

He told police he did “not recognize” the men or their vehicle and that he was concerned because of the recent burglaries.





http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/23/did-trayvon-shooter-abuse-911.html




So as a watch captain, in an area that was having numerous home robberies, him making a 911 call, approx. every 2 months, is a sign of being "quick to call"?
 
cite the law that he can't be armed. cite the law that says he can't follow anyone. cite the facts that show he profiled blacks...

Who said laws were involved?

He had no business being armed, no business chasing anyone, and no business profiling Blacks.

Zimmerman called police 46 times and complained about "Black males".

He claimed Martin was "suspicious".

He followed him despite being advised not to, and despite Neighborhood Watch procedures.

Zimmerman was armed.

Those actions are strongly discouraged by the National Sheriffs' Association, which oversees about 20,000 Neighborhood Watch programs.






http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...314_1_orlando-police-block-captains-zimmerman
 
Who said laws were involved?

He had no business being armed, no business chasing anyone, and no business profiling Blacks.

Zimmerman called police 46 times and complained about "Black males".

He claimed Martin was "suspicious".

He followed him despite being advised not to, and despite Neighborhood Watch procedures.

Zimmerman was armed.

Those actions are strongly discouraged by the National Sheriffs' Association, which oversees about 20,000 Neighborhood Watch programs.






http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...314_1_orlando-police-block-captains-zimmerman

so you have nothing...thanks for admitting that.
 
I believe that if Zimmerman had been a cop rather than a neighborhood watch volunteer STY would gave posted a thread on out of control police. The fact that Martin looked like others who had committed crimes is irrelevant. At the time he was confronted he was not committing a crime. Even if, for the sake of argument, Martin was planning in his mind to commit a crime, until the moment he put that plan into motion, Zimmerman had no right to confront him.
 
I believe that if Zimmerman had been a cop rather than a neighborhood watch volunteer STY would gave posted a thread on out of control police. The fact that Martin looked like others who had committed crimes is irrelevant. At the time he was confronted he was not committing a crime. Even if, for the sake of argument, Martin was planning in his mind to commit a crime, until the moment he put that plan into motion, Zimmerman had no right to confront him.

is it against the law to confront someone?
 
and if martin had broken in to some apartment and raped/murdered some young woman, people would be bitching about why didn't zimmerman do anything.

Is there any evidence that Martin was a burglar or rapist? Or is the fact that he was Black enough to make you fear he was contemplating those crimes?
 
Who said laws were involved?

He had no business being armed, no business chasing anyone, and no business profiling Blacks.

Zimmerman called police 46 times and complained about "Black males".

He claimed Martin was "suspicious".

He followed him despite being advised not to, and despite Neighborhood Watch procedures.

Zimmerman was armed.

Those actions are strongly discouraged by the National Sheriffs' Association, which oversees about 20,000 Neighborhood Watch programs.






http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...314_1_orlando-police-block-captains-zimmerman


The National Sheriffs' Association discourages calling police 46 times in 80" months, complaining about "Black males", and claiming that anyone is suspicious!!
Seems like a waste of time, otherwise.
 
What about a state with a stand your ground law?

Here's Florida's law:

[SIZE=-1]A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.


http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes...ing&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.013.html

[/SIZE]
 
Back
Top