Politically Incorrect Movies

Flanders

Verified User
Racism is an invented sin; a twentieth century crime invented by sharpshooters, race hustlers, do gooders and religious fanatics. Racism is an invented sin that became a crime. Hear me out on this beforelabeling me a racist.

There is no mention of racism in the text of any of the major religions, or laws, judicial systems, cultures, or anywhere else. Not one religious leader, philosopher, or political thinker ever heard about racism before the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century for one very good reason. RACISM DID NOT EXIST until it appeared when it was invented by race hustlers and dirty little moralists decades after the American Civil War ended.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ate-Milk-Is-Not-A-Bigot&p=2758136#post2758136



Racism will become a historical fact after dirty white moralists and filthy black race hustlers shout “RACISM” loud often and long enough in every way imaginable.


Mary Poppins branded racist by US academic over scene where she gets covered in soot
Asher Mcshane

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/us-academic-sparks-mary-poppins-blackface-row-a4056126.html

Black race hustlers have a long list of words they cite as “racist”

https://www.morewords.com/contains/black/

NOTE: Black race hustlers’ pissing and moaning about the word niggardly would be a joke if it was not so harmful:

https://www.google.com/search?sourc......0....2j1..gws-wiz.....0..33i10._RxchKs8nR8

White degenerates push the myth of racism certain they can benefit from the lie —— criminal perverts are morally superior, too:


Racism is the sweetest, most profitable, long-running, con job every black race hustler gets away with; i.e., the black race is morally superior. The scam was designed and executed to show that the black race is superior to every other race —— ergo, every black criminal, pervert, and murderer is morally superior to the entire race of white devils.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ate-Milk-Is-Not-A-Bigot&p=2758136#post2758136

NOTE: Decent black Americans were deeply offended when gays tied their demands to the Civil Rights Movement in the 1950s and 1960s. As time went by they began marching in the same parades and preached the same political garbage. White and black criminal freaks are now a protected class —— protected by the Democrats Party’s judges in their courts.

Organized religion’s faithful always claimed moral superiority for their particular brand of goodness, while nobody ever claimed that calling Italians wops, or Germans krauts, or Irish micks, or Jews kikes, or Chinese chinks, and so on made them morally superior because of their ancestral homelands. Defining a race as morally superior is the only one so honored. Perverts and degenerates jumped on the bandwagon.

A few countries do protect racism. Some countries in Africa only allow blacks in. Japan and China are not exactly havens of tolerance. Our federal government went the other way when the New World Oder crowd ordered an attack on the individual’s Right to select his or her associates. What is worse is that the U.S. government tells the rest of the world how to live and who they must live with.

Some individuals in every race simply do not want to be forced into associating with members of another race.

The best way to combat race hustlers in the United States is to dump the U.N. and everything it represents. Notice that I said the United States and not the world. U.N. charity hustlers rail against racism when they come sucking around looking for more money even though invented racism is not much older than the United Nations.

If American do-gooders ever learn to mind their own business the rest of the world will deal with harmony among the races on a country by country basis. Some may prefer to allow only one race in their countries, others will opt to imitate the U.S. The choice should be theirs, not the U.N.’s. Coercion should never be part of any political decision.

American and International Communists are using racism to separate the American people into warring camps.

Should Americans ever believe Socialists/Communists running the Democratic party, all of the other countries in the world will align themselves against the American people if the U.S. withdraws from the U.N. If that political interpretation is correct the U.S. should withdraw posthaste. What better way to combat the race hustlers in the U.S. than by dumping the U.N. Such a turn of events will require all Americans to stand together when the loving, caring, humanitarians from every other country in the world attack us.

As near as I can determine there is no so-called racism involved when white and non-white Americans stand together against a common enemy.

No borders is another part of the Socialist plan that increases hatred between races rather than reduce it. Unrestricted immigration is reported as though black Americans favor it. In truth, no borders was designed to turn fairminded whites against blacks, along with pissing-off KKK members. No one has ever shown me any proof that a majority of black Americans are in favor of open-borders.

Black Americans do vote in large numbers for Democrats who are the architects of open borders, but I do not connect that voting pattern to black acceptance of unregulated immigration. No borders is actually doing more financial harm to black Americans than it does to any other group. As illegal aliens pour in from Third World shit holes the poorest American blacks are once again being shoved further down the food chain.


NOTE: Dark-skinned people from the Middle East consider themselves more black than white, but they do not see themselves quite as black as Negroes of pure African ancestry.

On the other hand, doing away with immigration restrictions in every country could work for black Americans in one respect. If thirty-five million black Americans decided to emigrate to one or two countries in Africa, they could takeover the entire continent in no time at all as happened with European settlers and Native Americans. Substitute racial discrimination for religious intolerance and you have the same ingredients that prompted European whites to come to the New World.

Black Americans are certainly more advanced than the overwhelming majority of native Africans. If societal evolution brought on by a mass migration to Africa repeats the New World paradigm, black Americans and their descendants could soon be living on, and dominating, a continent without white people to contend with. (Whites are already leaving some parts of Africa.)

Finally, Mary Poppins in black face notwithstanding, politically incorrect movies are given a pass because black actors are doing okay feeding at the public trough alongside Hollywood and television parasites. Proof: You can find a lot of movies that politically correct race purists should have banned. Here are two of my favorite examples:

1. In the 1939 movie You Can’t Cheat An Honest Man W.C. Fields (1880 - 1946) said “I detect a Ubangi in the fuel supply.”


https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Ubangi

2. Many experts consider Casablanca the most romantic movie ever made. In fact Casablanca qualifies as a musical. Not because of the song As Time Goes By, but because there are twenty or so different pieces of music in Casablanca; mostly as background music; some are played twice. Hell, they even managed to squeeze the French National Anthem in there.

Just why the Socialists/Communists are not up in arms over Casablanca being honored is beyond me. Sam, the black piano player played by Dooley Wilson, sings As Time Goes By. He also sings this song in the background:
 
Last edited:

(Frankie Laine’s rendition of Shine was mildly successful.)

Now imagine putting Shine in a movie today, and have a black guy sing it! If the word niggardly that had nothing to do with race is a no-no to Socialists just think what the race hustlers can do with Shine. One would think that the politically correct crowd would be outraged by the lyrics.


Shine
Frankie Laine

Cause my hair is curly
Just because my teeth are pearly
Just because I always wear a smile
Like to dress up in the latest style

Cause I'm glad I'm livin'
I take these troubles all with a smile
Just because my color's shady
That's the difference, maybe, why they call me Shine

Shine, sway your blues'ies
Why don't you shine?
Start with your shoes'ies
Shine each place up, make it look like new
Shine your face up, I want to see you wear a smile or two

Why don't you shine your these and thoseies?
You'll find everything gonna turn out right fine
Folks will shine up to ya'
Everybody's gonna howdy doody do-ya'
You'll make the whole world shine

Oh chocolate drop, that's me...

Cause my hair is curly, (man's got curly hair)
Now just because my teeth are pearly, (also got pearly teeth)
Just because I always wear a smile, (oh keep on smiling)
Like to dress us, babe, in the latest style

Cause I'm glad I'm livin'
I take these troubles all with a smile
Now just because my color's shady (you's a shady baby)
That's the difference, maybe, why they call me...

Shine away your blues'ies
Shine, start with your shoes'ies
You'll make the whole world shine

Where has J. Jackson and all da black reverends been all these years?

The premise of Casablanca glorified Socialism/Communism by making fascism the greater evil (they are two sides of the same coin as I said often enough). In WWII movies, fictional courageous characters took up arms against the Nazis, but never against Soviet Communists. Fighting for Communism without talking about it was the way idealism was defined by Hollywood in those days. It still is as time goes by.

Rick, played by Humphrey Bogart, is a sleazy bar owner who sells Sam like a piece of property along with selling the bar to another white guy. That is one more reason the race hustlers should be screaming bloody murder.

As far as romance goes: Ilsa, the woman that Ingrid Bergman played, was a trollop. If they ever do a remake of Casablanca, the ending would have a gang of bad bikers pull up to Rick's Café and proceed to engage in some serious ass-kicking. The final scene would show Ilsa going off on the back of the gang leader's bike to find happiness servicing the gang as Big Momma Biker Bitch.
 
Last edited:
Not one religious leader, philosopher, or political thinker ever heard about racism before the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century for one very good reason. RACISM DID NOT EXIST until it appeared when it was invented by race hustlers and dirty little moralists decades after the American Civil War ended.

Then why did people think it was okay to enslave blacks but not whites? I suggest it was because blacks were thought to be sub-human. If that isn't racism, what is?

People in the west began questioning this in the 18th century, partly as a result of the Enlightenment but mainly on religious grounds - ironically many of them were evangelicals. They concluded that blacks were obviously different in some ways, maybe "inferior", but certainly not sub-human. So the abolition movement started.

Many of the things you are complaining about could be considered a possible overreaction to centuries of RACIST oppression.
 
Then why did people think it was okay to enslave blacks but not whites?

Many of the things you are complaining about could be considered a possible overreaction to centuries of RACIST oppression.

To Tranquillus in Exile: See this thread for a more detailed analysis of slavery and the word racism. They are completely different topics:

Finally, slavery is not racism. Slavery was about cheap labor. (Nothing is cheaper that forced labor.) At one time or another members of every race were slaves as well as slave owners. Communist governments still enslave irrespective of race.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ate-Milk-Is-Not-A-Bigot&p=2758136#post2758136

Just read the Old Testament. Plenty of commentary about race.

To The Anonymous: I do not read Bibles, nor do I debate them. I will gladly discuss any Bible quotation that cites racism rather than race.



To Jack: Interesting link.


400px-%22The_White_Man%27s_Burden%22_Judge_1899.png

John Bull (Great Britain) and Uncle Sam (U.S.) bear "The White Man's Burden" (Apologies to Rudyard Kipling), by delivering the coloured peoples of the world to civilization. (Judge magazine, 1 April 1899)

White do-gooders and busybodies have been “saving” Africa for centuries and it only gets darker on the Dark Continent. Communists in this country continue to stoke the hatred and anger that began in Nazi Germany. Fascism is a catchall word that includes Invented-racism. Nothing invokes the charge of FASCIST more than giving race hustlers an opportunity to accuse someone of being a racist.

More to the point, American Democrats believe that Africa’s ills can only be cured by black race hustlers controlling white Americans, and by extension controlling white Europeans by erasing every national border. Basically, angry blacks everywhere are retaliating against every centuries-old slight, real or imagined. Note that people of mixed race are the most virulent haters even though half of their ancestors had nothing to with the slighting.

Their anger is rooted in the bromide that says non-white races are the white man’s burden.

Admittedly, there are different interpretations of Rudyard Kipling’s poem The White Man's Burden addressed in your link. In today’s interpretation angry blacks intend to make the white race pay through the nose for simply treating non-whites as a burden in the first place. (A white supremacist would accuse them of biting the hand that feeds them.)

Parenthetically, the invention of racism in the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century put teeth in the self-serving grievances of every race-hustler.

Alas, white race hustlers in the Democrat Party cannot possibly have the same intense fire in their bellies that burns in black Americans. Black politicians are doubly-dangerous, not because they are morally superior as they claim, but because they are the most cunning bunch of hate-filled politicians to ever acquire political power.


350px-White_mans_burden_the_journal_detroit.JPG

The White Man's Burden: civilising the unwilling savage. (Detroit Journal, 1898)

Finally, Rudyard Kipling poem was written as a response to the American takeover of the Philippines after the Spanish-American War ended. The world be a lot happier had non-whites remained uncivilized:


The White Man's Burden by:

Take up the White Man's burden--
Send forth the best ye breed--
Go bind your sons to exile
To serve your captives' need;
To wait in heavy harness,
On fluttered folk and wild--
Your new-caught, sullen peoples,
Half-devil and half-child.

Take up the White Man's burden--
In patience to abide,
To veil the threat of terror
And check the show of pride;
By open speech and simple,
An hundred times made plain
To seek another's profit,
And work another's gain.

Take up the White Man's burden--
The savage wars of peace--
Fill full the mouth of Famine
And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest
The end for others sought,
Watch sloth and heathen Folly
Bring all your hopes to nought.

Take up the White Man's burden--
No tawdry rule of kings,
But toil of serf and sweeper--
The tale of common things.
The ports ye shall not enter,
The roads ye shall not tread,
Go mark them with your living,
And mark them with your dead.

Take up the White Man's burden--
And reap his old reward:
The blame of those ye better,
The hate of those ye guard--
The cry of hosts ye humour
(Ah, slowly!) toward the light:--
"Why brought he us from bondage,
Our loved Egyptian night?"

Take up the White Man's burden--
Ye dare not stoop to less--
Nor call too loud on Freedom
To cloak your weariness;
By all ye cry or whisper,
By all ye leave or do,
The silent, sullen peoples
Shall weigh your gods and you.

Take up the White Man's burden--
Have done with childish days--
The lightly proffered laurel,
The easy, ungrudged praise.
Comes now, to search your manhood
Through all the thankless years
Cold, edged with dear-bought wisdom,
The judgment of your peers!

p.s. The Phillippines got their independence without firing a shot. A whole lot of shots are being fired by Muslims in the Philippines today.


2F747809-2979-4ED9-BCD1-5E0C90F69AC4-27882-0000232EE257B1D6.jpeg

 
Last edited:
To Tranquillus in Exile: See this thread for a more detailed analysis of slavery and the word racism. They are completely different topics:

Finally, slavery is not racism. Slavery was about cheap labor. (Nothing is cheaper that forced labor.) At one time or another members of every race were slaves as well as slave owners. Communist governments still enslave irrespective of race.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ate-Milk-Is-Not-A-Bigot&p=2758136#post2758136



To The Anonymous: I do not read Bibles, nor do I debate them. I will gladly discuss any Bible quotation that cites racism rather than race.




To Jack: Interesting link.


400px-%22The_White_Man%27s_Burden%22_Judge_1899.png

John Bull (Great Britain) and Uncle Sam (U.S.) bear "The White Man's Burden" (Apologies to Rudyard Kipling), by delivering the coloured peoples of the world to civilization. (Judge magazine, 1 April 1899)

White do-gooders and busybodies have been “saving” Africa for centuries and it only gets darker on the Dark Continent. Communists in this country continue to stoke the hatred and anger that began in Nazi Germany. Fascism is a catchall word that includes Invented-racism. Nothing invokes the charge of FASCIST more than giving race hustlers an opportunity to accuse someone of being a racist.

More to the point, American Democrats believe that Africa’s ills can only be cured by black race hustlers controlling white Americans, and by extension controlling white Europeans by erasing every national border. Basically, angry blacks everywhere are retaliating against every centuries-old slight, real or imagined. Note that people of mixed race are the most virulent haters even though half of their ancestors had nothing to with the slighting.

Their anger is rooted in the bromide that says non-white races are the white man’s burden.

Admittedly, there are different interpretations of Rudyard Kipling’s poem The White Man's Burden addressed in your link. In today’s interpretation angry blacks intend to make the white race pay through the nose for simply treating non-whites as a burden in the first place. (A white supremacist would accuse them of biting the hand that feeds them.)

Parenthetically, the invention of racism in the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century put teeth in the self-serving grievances of every race-hustler.

Alas, white race hustlers in the Democrat Party cannot possibly have the same intense fire in their bellies that burns in black Americans. Black politicians are doubly-dangerous, not because they are morally superior as they claim, but because they are the most cunning bunch of hate-filled politicians to ever acquire political power.


350px-White_mans_burden_the_journal_detroit.JPG

The White Man's Burden: civilising the unwilling savage. (Detroit Journal, 1898)

Finally, Rudyard Kipling poem was written as a response to the American takeover of the Philippines after the Spanish-American War ended. The world be a lot happier had non-whites remained uncivilized:


The White Man's Burden by:

Take up the White Man's burden--
Send forth the best ye breed--
Go bind your sons to exile
To serve your captives' need;
To wait in heavy harness,
On fluttered folk and wild--
Your new-caught, sullen peoples,
Half-devil and half-child.

Take up the White Man's burden--
In patience to abide,
To veil the threat of terror
And check the show of pride;
By open speech and simple,
An hundred times made plain
To seek another's profit,
And work another's gain.

Take up the White Man's burden--
The savage wars of peace--
Fill full the mouth of Famine
And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest
The end for others sought,
Watch sloth and heathen Folly
Bring all your hopes to nought.

Take up the White Man's burden--
No tawdry rule of kings,
But toil of serf and sweeper--
The tale of common things.
The ports ye shall not enter,
The roads ye shall not tread,
Go mark them with your living,
And mark them with your dead.

Take up the White Man's burden--
And reap his old reward:
The blame of those ye better,
The hate of those ye guard--
The cry of hosts ye humour
(Ah, slowly!) toward the light:--
"Why brought he us from bondage,
Our loved Egyptian night?"

Take up the White Man's burden--
Ye dare not stoop to less--
Nor call too loud on Freedom
To cloak your weariness;
By all ye cry or whisper,
By all ye leave or do,
The silent, sullen peoples
Shall weigh your gods and you.

Take up the White Man's burden--
Have done with childish days--
The lightly proffered laurel,
The easy, ungrudged praise.
Comes now, to search your manhood
Through all the thankless years
Cold, edged with dear-bought wisdom,
The judgment of your peers!

p.s. The Phillippines got their independence without firing a shot. A whole lot of shots are being fired by Muslims in the Philippines today.


2F747809-2979-4ED9-BCD1-5E0C90F69AC4-27882-0000232EE257B1D6.jpeg

You're definitely a racist.

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk
 
Rudyard Kipling poem was written as a response to the American takeover of the Philippines ...

Take up the White Man's burden
The savage wars of peace
Fill full the mouth of Famine
And bid the sickness cease


I know, but Kipling wasn't there to see this:

The Philippine-American War lasted three years and resulted in the death of over 4,200 American and over 20,000 Filipino combatants. As many as 200,000 Filipino civilians died from violence, famine, and disease.

The war was brutal on both sides. U.S. forces at times burned villages, implemented civilian reconcentration policies [i.e. concentration camps], and employed torture on suspected guerrillas, while Filipino fighters also tortured captured soldiers and terrorized civilians ... Many civilians died during the conflict as a result of the fighting, cholera and malaria epidemics, and food shortages caused by several agricultural catastrophes.

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1899-1913/war


220px-Life_05-22-1902.JPG


1902 Life magazine cover depicting "water curing" of a prisoner by U.S. troops in the Philippines.
 
I know, but Kipling wasn't there to see this:

The Philippine-American War lasted three years and resulted in the death of over 4,200 American and over 20,000 Filipino combatants. As many as 200,000 Filipino civilians died from violence, famine, and disease.

The war was brutal on both sides. U.S. forces at times burned villages, implemented civilian reconcentration policies [i.e. concentration camps], and employed torture on suspected guerrillas, while Filipino fighters also tortured captured soldiers and terrorized civilians ... Many civilians died during the conflict as a result of the fighting, cholera and malaria epidemics, and food shortages caused by several agricultural catastrophes.

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1899-1913/war


220px-Life_05-22-1902.JPG


1902 Life magazine cover depicting "water curing" of a prisoner by U.S. troops in the Philippines.

To Tranquillus in Exile: I often went to Manila etc., and spent time in the Philippines (Subic Bay) on ships waiting to deliver the cargo to Vietnam. Even before that I read a lot about the Spanish-American war —— and before the war when Filipinos were revolting against Spain. I will not bore you with my understanding of the Spanish-American War in the Philippines.

I can tell you this from experience. Older Filipinos that suffered under the Japanese occupation greatly admired and respected Americans. That respect was all lost during the Vietnam War. All of the political lies told about the Vietnam War turned young generations of Filipinos against this country. Few Americans realize that the lies John Kerry told to a congressional hearing was a gift to Communists around the world.

Tragically, younger Americans know nothing about Vietnam, while Communists everywhere still use Kerry’s lies to convince peoples everywhere that Americans are murdering savages starting wars to enslave and kill them.
 
Then why did people think it was okay to enslave blacks but not whites? I suggest it was because blacks were thought to be sub-human. If that isn't racism, what is?

People in the west began questioning this in the 18th century, partly as a result of the Enlightenment but mainly on religious grounds - ironically many of them were evangelicals. They concluded that blacks were obviously different in some ways, maybe "inferior", but certainly not sub-human. So the abolition movement started.

Many of the things you are complaining about could be considered a possible overreaction to centuries of RACIST oppression.

The Nazis thought that Slavs were Untermenschen, did they not?
 
Here's the top politically incorrect movies conservatives hate.

Gettysburg - The South Loses...again.
A League of their own - Women prove they can play baseball too.
Spartacus - A slave revolt? God forbid!
Aladdin - a rags to riches story about a poor Arab boy who grows up to not be a terrorist.
The X-Men - A minority group fights for their rights.
 
On Tuesday, Hogg tweeted his accusation about the rich:


“For hundreds of years rich people have used racism and xenophobia to convince poor people that rich people are not the problem.”


Rep. Rashida Tlaib Agrees with David Hogg: ‘Yes!’ Rich People Are ‘The Problem’
By Craig Bannister
July 17, 2019 | 11:25 AM EDT

https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/craig-...agrees-david-hogg-yes-rich-people-are-problem

I love it when a full-grown idiot agrees with an adolescent halfwit:

Racism is an invented sin; a twentieth century crime invented by sharpshooters, race hustlers, do gooders and religious fanatics. Racism is an invented sin that became a crime. Hear me out on this before labeling me a racist.

There is no mention of racism in the text of any of the major religions, or laws, judicial systems, cultures, or anywhere else. Not one religious leader, philosopher, or political thinker ever heard about racism before the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century for one very good reason. RACISM DID NOT EXIST until it appeared when it was invented by race hustlers and dirty little moralists decades after the American Civil War ended.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ate-Milk-Is-Not-A-Bigot&p=2758136#post2758136
 
Last edited:
Here's the top politically incorrect movies conservatives hate.

Gettysburg - The South Loses...again.
A League of their own - Women prove they can play baseball too.
Spartacus - A slave revolt? God forbid!
Aladdin - a rags to riches story about a poor Arab boy who grows up to not be a terrorist.
The X-Men - A minority group fights for their rights.

The Grapes of Wrath
 
The Grapes of Wrath

To Miss Margot Frank:
Before I address your response let me remind you of Hanoi Jane’s political philosophy:


I, a Socialist, think we should strive toward a Socialist society, all the way to Communism.

"If you understood what Communism was, you would hope, you would pray on your knees that one day we would become Communist." (speaking to students at the University of Michigan in 1970)

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000404/bio

Those beliefs coming from an average American give new meaning to stupidity. Coming from a mind diseased by a lifetime of Hollywood politics is a testament to gullibility.

Parenthetically, I always thought Ziggy Freud would have had a field day inside Jane Fonda’s head because she was never quite sure who her father was; Henry or Tom Joad.

For your edification this scene is the heart and soul of the movie:



Muley is willing to die for a piece of land he does not own. Put that scene in perspective:

The theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.

That definition is attributed to Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820 – 1895). Presumably Jane Fonda agrees.

Here is Socialism's dilemma. How can Communists fight for the common man when they want to abolish private property? Answer: They cannot.

Private property is more than owning a farm. Real property includes owning your own home. So when Communists abolish private property they must abolish homeownership. They have been doing that very thing with property taxes.
 
Back
Top