No, I am just saying, if Sarah Palin were not significant, if she were another Dan Quayle, you and your liberal buddies would have stopped talking about her on November 5th of last year, and most everyone would have forgotten about her by now. But that is clearly NOT the case, is it? We continue to see threads posted, and pinheads responding... breaking their necks to take a pot shot at Sarah Palin.... why? It simply doesn't make sense if Palin is not significant, if Palin doesn't matter anymore. What DOES make sense, is the liberal left senses how much potential danger this woman poses to liberalism and the liberal agenda, and they need to do everything they can to discredit her and impugn her integrity as much as possible, before she is able to wreak havoc on Liberalism.
Is Michael Jackson "significant"? Everyone is talking about him, too.
You always draw the wrong conclusions, using whatever logic works for you. Has it occurred to you that liberals still attack Palin not because they are terrified of her and view her as formidable, but because conservatives are completely enamored of her still?
I don't care who it is; if we on the left adored someone & gushed over them all day, you'd proabably start about a dozen threads a week bashing them. That's just how it is. It has nothing to do with how "formidable" someone is.
Frankly, when you & meme & Tutu & the rest keep asserting that we're so terrified of her, it's kind of funny....