Wrong question.
The correct question is "Why did the EPA lie about pollution and other things"?
The good news is that you asked the right person. I can answer that.
All government agencies are headed by
political appointees. Both operative words in that term are critical. They are not called "government appointees." They are "political" appointees. They are specifically appointed by other politically elected individuals. Of course by being "appointed" they are expected to adhere to the
political appointer's
political agenda. Let me know if I'm going too fast for you.
This really should not be the first time you are learning this. Whoever was responsible for your education did you a terrible disservice by not explaining to you how our government operates. The EPA is headed by a political appointee, currently Andrew Wheeler. Gina McCarthy was installed by Obama under strict orders to impose fear and panic of
Global Warming upon the American people with bogus gibber-babble she called "thettled thieth" and to lie compulsively for the DNC's political purposes. You have to ask her and/or Obama why she lied about a life-essential compound being "pollution" and "poison." Fortunately, Trump has Wheeler under strict orders to ferret out all the lies and dishonesty among the EPA's regulations that were clearly put there to crush the economy and to make
We the People utterly dependent upon the government. This should not be the first time you are learning about how politicians CRAVE power and seek to compel the people into submission. You should have learned this long ago. You also should have learned to appreciate when you finally have a President or other politician who works to free the people from the bonds of a tyrannical government or deep-state oligarchy.
We are fortunate to have Trump undoing the criminal damage Obama inflicted on this country via the EPA.
https://time.com/4713731/donald-trump-climate-change-executive-order-president-obama-epa/
Let's analyze this sentence right here and see what we can glean about you.
1. You are scientifically illiterate yourself. You don't know what you are talking about. You wander through life completely enslaved by cults of personality.
2. You somehow think that science is subjective and determined by consensus of opinion. You richly deserve to be mocked.
3. You mention "international community of scientists" like there is such a thing and then you pretend that you somehow speak for them. What scientist in his right mind would approve of you, of all people, speaking for him much less for any science organization? Too funny.
I'm going to have a lot of fun with you.
View attachment 16462