President Biden did not defame Rittenhouse…..

zymurgy said:
This is the part of the case that could be precedent setting.

to win defamation he will have to overcome the defenses argument of being a public figure - I struggle on this as well. this case became so huge, he certainly did become a public figure.

Sandmann only became a public figure because of the defamation - so that is a completely different situation
Click to expand...

was he a public figure before the left's defaming statements made him one?.....
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Biden called Rittenhouse, among other factually wrong things, a "White supremacist." That is a fact.
Biden is clearly a public figure with a considerable reach in terms of media coverage. He as a public figure has a duty to be factual in what he says to the maximum extent possible.
Rittenhouse is not a White supremacist, and is not and never has been associated with any White supremacist group. That too is a fact.
Biden has a large staff that can do things like fact check material and inform him of facts before he speaks on a matter.


https://legal-dictionary.thefreedic...making,libel and, if only oral, it is slander.

A Biden has never retracted that statement, nor has he or his staff apologized and retracted it, it amounts to a public figure making an intentionally false communication. That false communication has been widely repeated by other parts of the media without correction. This is prima facie evidence that Biden in making that statement defamed Rittenhouse.

It's also par for the course that a mental midget who plagiarized his way through his simple liberal arts degree in law, among other plagiarizations, who has shown a frequent inability to speak coherently, and says thing that are just short of insane, would motorboat his mouth in this case defaming Rittenhouse expecting no retribution for his idiotic and hateful comments.
Click to expand...

Indeed.

He can sue multiple persons and the media.
 
Jarod said:
Simply UNTRUE, where is the Biden quote?
Click to expand...

e to Whitehttps://www.foxnews.com › politics › flashback-biden-co...
2 days ago — Then-presidential candidate Joe Biden compared Kyle Rittenhouse to “white supremacists and militia groups” during a video posted on his ...

Slow Joe said it to get the votes of the far left loons.

Try to keep up, Jarod.
 
Last edited:
Rittenhouse is a national treasure.

There is a child molester and an abuser of women who will no longer molest children or abuse women.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Biden called Rittenhouse, among other factually wrong things, a "White supremacist." That is a fact.
Biden is clearly a public figure with a considerable reach in terms of media coverage. He as a public figure has a duty to be factual in what he says to the maximum extent possible.
Rittenhouse is not a White supremacist, and is not and never has been associated with any White supremacist group. That too is a fact..
Click to expand...

Wrong. He was forbidden by the court even, earlier this year, from associating with them. There is video of him in a bar (at age 18), hanging out with a group of self-confessed white supremacists, and making the "okay" sign as one of them.

This is the little turd you're defending:

"KENOSHA — Kyle Rittenhouse’s jury will not hear about his alleged ties to a far-right group or be shown a photo of him flashing a hand sign appropriated by some white supremacist groups when his murder case goes to trial later this year, a Kenosha County judge ruled Friday.

"Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder also barred prosecutors from playing a video in which Rittenhouse punched a girl and another in which the Antioch teen said he wished he had his assault rifle with him so he could shoot at people he believed were shoplifting from a drugstore."

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news...0210917-pu6l3fktbjb73monnpagczdesi-story.html

wknRl9Q.jpg


The truth is an absolute defense against your nutty defamation crap.
 
I have no training as a lawyer. I do have resources...my daughter’s Mother and Father-in-Law are both lawyers, one a criminal defense lawyer.

They are both in agreement that the prosecutor should be disbarred for hiding exculpatory evidence, referring to the Fifth Amendment with Rittenhouse when that has been litigated by the Supreme Court for four decades, and his conduct toward the judge.

I doubt it will happen
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Wrong. He was forbidden by the court even, earlier this year, from associating with them. There is video of him in a bar (at age 18), hanging out with a group of self-confessed white supremacists, and making the "okay" sign as one of them.

This is the little turd you're defending:

"KENOSHA — Kyle Rittenhouse’s jury will not hear about his alleged ties to a far-right group or be shown a photo of him flashing a hand sign appropriated by some white supremacist groups when his murder case goes to trial later this year, a Kenosha County judge ruled Friday.

"Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder also barred prosecutors from playing a video in which Rittenhouse punched a girl and another in which the Antioch teen said he wished he had his assault rifle with him so he could shoot at people he believed were shoplifting from a drugstore."

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news...0210917-pu6l3fktbjb73monnpagczdesi-story.html

wknRl9Q.jpg


The truth is an absolute defense against your nutty defamation crap.
Click to expand...

NOT guilty, Mujer de Buho...NOT guilty.
 
A moment of truth, Jarod.

You can redeem yourself...no shucking and jiving...just an admission that you lied...and were caught lying.
 
Earl said:
Rittenhouse is a national treasure.

There is a child molester and an abuser of women who will no longer molest children or abuse women.
Click to expand...

I found it hilarious when after all your bragging about Trump you disappeared when he got his ass beat!
 
As I thought, the truth is not in Jarod.

He is trash, just above the level of a common criminal...a con man or a stalker of women.
 
Earl said:
e to Whitehttps://www.foxnews.com › politics › flashback-biden-co...
2 days ago — Then-presidential candidate Joe Biden compared Kyle Rittenhouse to “white supremacists and militia groups” during a video posted on his ...

Slow Joe said it to get the votes of the far left loons.

Try to keep up, Jarod.
Click to expand...

What words did Biden use to defame Rittenhouse? Are you now changing your claim to "the Biden Campaign"? "The Biden Campaign" is not Biden.

How did the Biden Campaign compare Rittenhouse to White supremacists and militia groups? What words did they use? Did you know that comparing something to something else is not the same thing as calling someone something? Comparing does not constitute definition.

Are you Tumppers idiots or liars or both?
 
Jarod said:
What words did Biden use to defame Rittenhouse? Are you now changing your claim to "the Biden Campaign"? "The Biden Campaign" is not Biden.

How did the Biden Campaign compare Rittenhouse to White supremacists and militia groups? What words did they use? Did you know that comparing something to something else is not the same thing as calling someone something? Comparing does not constitute definition.

Are you Tumppers idiots or liars or both?
Click to expand...

You’ve already lost, pendejo.
 
zymurgy said:
This is the part of the case that could be precedent setting.

to win defamation he will have to overcome the defenses argument of being a public figure - I struggle on this as well. this case became so huge, he certainly did become a public figure.

Sandmann only became a public figure because of the defamation - so that is a completely different situation
Click to expand...

Nobody defamed Sandmann.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top