I don't think everyone on the left really supports Hillary in that role. If she couldn't do last time, she won't do it next time
Sorry to sound morbid, but I don't know if Hillary is going to be with us in 2016.
Normally, the person to follow a two-term president, is his two-term VP, isn't it?
Why aren't we seeing the pinhead excitement over Biden 2016?
I don't think everyone on the left really supports Hillary in that role. If she couldn't do last time, she won't do it next time
I voted for Hilary as did the state I live in.
The problem was voting for Obama was even more progressive than voting for Hilary.
There are a LOT of Dems who fanatically hate Hillary. I knew some of them in college, and they were really worried that she might get nominated in 2008. That's not to say she can't get nominated with the base she does have, and subsequently get elected, but these people are still out there, and they still buy into the "Hillary is evil" line.
Normally? Really? Ok, so Bush Sr. did.... Bush Jr., followed Clinton... Id say normally Bush follows a two term president, but that aint going to happen again, is it?
I never understood the fanatical hate from Dems.
Hillary is the ORIGINAL Birther, you did know that, right?
>Implying that matters to Democrats when talking about Democrat candidatesHillary can't fool people into thinking she is antiwar, supports civil liberties or is not in the pocket of the rich the way Obama can/could.
>Implying the reelection of Obama didn't cement this as Democrat policy.If the Democrats drop all pretense on those issues and embrace big government fascism maybe she can win the nomination.
>Implying 40% of voters would vote against their party of choice, regardless of candidate.The GOP looks pretty dysfunctional and whoever is nominated by the Democrats might win
>Implying that matters to Democrats when talking about Democrat candidates
>Implying the reelection of Obama didn't cement this as Democrat policy.
>Implying 40% of voters would vote against their party of choice, regardless of candidate.
>Implying implications
>ISHYGDDT
![]()
>Implying that matters to Democrats when talking about Democrat candidates
>Implying the reelection of Obama didn't cement this as Democrat policy.
>Implying 40% of voters would vote against their party of choice, regardless of candidate.
>Implying implications
>ISHYGDDT
![]()
your font color is awesome
that is all