President Trump reaches framework for a Greenland and "entire Arctic Region" deal with NATO Secretary General Rutte

Yep. The markets are the only decent economic indicator the #FatFuckingFelon has going for him. You can bet that his wealthy cronies bombarded him with "you better knock this shit off" messages. He doesn't give a shit about @ziggy, FatLame, or @volsrocks or any of his other worshipers. But he does care what the oligarchs think.
Agreed. Everytime the Dementia Don says or does something stupid that adversely affects the bond markets, the TACO man comes out. :ROFLMAO: :rofl2: :ROFLMAO:
 
Poor anchovies,
Glad we agree.
How's it doin' today?
Slowly climbing, just as it was during the Biden years

And don’t fool yourself, the only people profiting measurably off the Market today are those with discretionary income, ie, the tech industry, the easiest way to make a million is to star with a million, the average smuck ain’t seeing the benefits
 
The old saying will always prove true in this United States: "Money talks and bullshit walks". Trump's actions are costing rich people a lot of money.
"Serve the classes, eat with the masses. Serve the masses, eat with the classes". The smarter rich people realize they may have taken too much away from their customers, the regular people.
 
"Serve the classes, eat with the masses. Serve the masses, eat with the classes". The smarter rich people realize they may have taken too much away from their customers, the regular people.
Yeah

They know it’s time to pivot from the deregulationless course

They have no choice or the game gets broken

One of the protections of a Democracy

If they just keep taking they face the breaking

It’s hard to stay rich if no one is buying and selling

Then the wealth doesn’t grow

And we all know there brains are set on greed mode

Enough is ever enough

It’s always more more more

They like to pretend they can win while enslaving everyone

At some point they remember


You can’t fight the people


And when the people start building their own game without you

How do you get more more more

What if everybody went on strike for a week?

It’s not impossible
 
In welfare economics, a Pareto improvement formalizes the idea of an outcome being "better in every possible way." A change is called a Pareto improvement if it leaves at least one person in society better off without leaving anyone else worse off than they were before. A situation is called Pareto efficient or Pareto optimal if all possible Pareto improvements have already been made; in other words, there are no longer any ways left to make one person better off without making some other person worse-off.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_efficiency#cite_note-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a>

In other words if the wealthy try to tip it beyond 80 of the assets

It’s not proficient anymore more

If you don’t allow for Some to have a collection of wealth to some extent you also can not improve the society efficiently and improve lives


He had some interesting ideas that then applied ti other fields

That is why so many know about the 20/80 rule

Then the asshole became a Nazi
 
It’s ok to let some build wealth

At a certain point you have to tax them so they don’t go beyond a tipping point of 80 percent

If you do things get very bad

If you don’t allow wealth to build you end up with a system that isn’t working for the society

Investments in large projects won’t be possible for the market

So where is the balance?

Yo don’t have to allow them to just stay at the 80 percent mark

That’s just the tipping point

Let’s think about a number that might work?
50%?

That’s still a butt load of wealth huh

Think of how taxes can keep us at the correct level

By letting them play there competition game with each other

Huge projects can still be funded by private endeavors

And you can still give the VAST majority Of the population a great life

Happy proletariat happy life huh wealthy fucks

You can enjoy waving your nut sack at your wealthy friends to play your competition game of more more more

You can brag about how much taxes you pay as evidence of your claimed brilliance


And everyone’s happy
 
In 2007, the richest 1% of the American population owned 35% of the country's total wealth, and the next 19% owned 51%. The top 20% of Americans owned 86% of the country's wealth and the bottom 80% of the population owned 14%. In 2011, financial inequality was greater than inequality in total wealth, with the top 1% of the population owning 43%, the next 19% of Americans owning 50%, and the bottom 80% owning 7%.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States#cite_note-ForbesJacobs-16"><span>[</span>16<span>]</span></a> However, after the Great Recession, which began in 2007, the share of total wealth owned by the top 1% of the population grew from 35% to 37%, and that owned by the top 20% of Americans grew from 86% to 88%. The Great Recession also caused a drop of 36% in median household wealth, but a drop of only 11% for the top 1%, further widening the gap between the top 1% and the bottom 99%
 
The Top 20 percent has owned over 80% of the wealth for quite a while now


It’s not sustainable no matter how much you think your ideas do anything good

You believe in failed ideas
 
"Serve the classes, eat with the masses. Serve the masses, eat with the classes". The smarter rich people realize they may have taken too much away from their customers, the regular people.
Exactly. Fire people and automate everything to make widgets and no one will be able to afford widgets.
 
Back
Top