The small land launchers that were being developed 50 years ago dont exist, the very few huge launchers that exist would be eliminated immediately.HOGWASH they would give them launchers too.
This missile is sea launched generally.
President Trump says he might speak to Putin "I might say, look, if this war is not going to get settled, I'm going to send them tomahawks"
- Thread starter ziggy
- Start date
This missile is sea launched generally.
So take a move.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Difficult for you to understand I know. If the Russian military is weak, make a move. Unless you were lying.
Alexander of The Duran reports that the reason the Typhoon launcher (of which there are only a few) is so huge is because it has to be for technical reasons....small launchers that could survive the Russians likely are not possible....and they certainly do not exist currently.
You need to stop drinking.
Yes, the US has mobile launchers for Tomahawk missiles, including the Army's Mid-Range Capability (MRC) system and the Marine Corps's (USMC) Land-Based Tomahawk (LMSL) system, which uses a containerized four-round launcher on a mobile platform. These systems allow for land-based, mobile deployment of Tomahawks, giving them a long-range strike capability that can be moved to different locations.
Army
AI Overview
Land-based Tomahawk launchers are being developed and tested by the U.S. military, with the most prominent example being the Army's Typhon system, which uses the same Mark 41 Vertical Launch System cells found on Navy ships. While the Army has a functional system, the Marine Corps recently canceled its separate land-based Tomahawk program in favor of the NMESIS system.
Army's Typhon system
- The Army's land-based Tomahawk system is officially known as the Strategic Mid-range Fires System (SMRF), but also referred to as Typhon.
- It uses a trailer-mounted launcher with four strike-length cells from the Mark 41 Vertical Launching System.
- The system can fire both the Tomahawk cruise missile and the SM-6 missile.
- The Army activated its second Typhon battery at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in January 2024.
- The Marine Corps had been developing its own land-based Tomahawk program, but scrapped it in July 2025.
- Their system was also based on the Mark 41 VLS, with missiles likely carried on trailers towed by Logistics Vehicle System Replacement (LVSR) tractors.
- The Marines are now focusing on the NMESIS system instead
If they were not weak they would be eating caver in Kyiv. Ukraine had a third rate military and Russia has not been able to crush them yet, It has been 3 1/2 years what's up? in wounded and killed Russia has lost over a million men that is pretty pathetic for a well ran strong army. Ukraine doesn't even have a navey and the have sunk several Russian ships. Russia is a paper tiger. They have a logistics problem and are clueless on how to conduct combined forces warfare. Other than that they are just swell.
Your mind is swimming in Empire propaganda/fantasy.....you have no idea what reality looks like.
View: https://x.com/DanielLDavis1/status/1974471422178205978
US Tomahawk Missiles to Ukraine? Here’s the Real Story Supplying Tomahawks isn’t just unrealistic — it could drag the U.S. deeper into the war.Ukraine has no launch platforms. No subs. No destroyers. No Typhon systems.That means the missiles could only be fired with the direct action of U.S. troops — a massive escalation that would risk drawing us into a direct military confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia.As Jennifer Kavanagh
@jekavanagh
explains, this was never about practicality — it’s about pressure, politics, and dangerous posturing. Full episode of Daniel Davis Deep Dive here:
US Tomahawk Missiles to Ukraine? Here’s the Real Story Supplying Tomahawks isn’t just unrealistic — it could drag the U.S. deeper into the war.Ukraine has no launch platforms. No subs. No destroyers. No Typhon systems.That means the missiles could only be fired with the direct action of U.S. troops — a massive escalation that would risk drawing us into a direct military confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia.As Jennifer Kavanagh
@jekavanagh
explains, this was never about practicality — it’s about pressure, politics, and dangerous posturing. Full episode of Daniel Davis Deep Dive here:
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
If he's pissed, let's see him do something about Putin's weak military.
Crepitus
Verified User
We have a truck based launcher now.
It is a huge system....Russia would spot it and destroy it immediately....likely before any launch attempt.
And there are only three systems I have been told.
And it would be manned by Americans....it would take a year to teach Ukrainians how to use it....and the data load would have to come from America.
Crepitus
Verified User
Not a typhoon, they can be launched from a modified M41 VLS
Crepitus
Verified User
My understanding is they exist. That's really all I can tell you.
Everyone I have heard on this subject says that they dont.....including at the Deep Dive link.