Proof Gonzo lied surfaces right after testimony

Hmm Drudge has an article about the FBI director contradicting /gonzo's testimony.
That darned liberal Drudge.
When that study done by Berkely using phraseology to find the lean of a news site hit his site it actually found it to "lean" left as most of the stories linked are from other sources. It did find that his personal stories lean right, of course.

In this case, however. Stating that the FBI Director contradicted somebody, even Gonzales, is simply fact, not "lean".
 
When that study done by Berkely using phraseology to find the lean of a news site hit his site it actually found it to "lean" left as most of the stories linked are from other sources. It did find that his personal stories lean right, of course.

In this case, however. Stating that the FBI Director contradicted somebody, even Gonzales, is simply fact, not "lean".

Yeah, tell it to Tony Snow, who was on Hardball last night actually claiming that in fact, Muehler did not contradict Gonzo, that in fact, Comey did not contradict Gonzo, and he can't wait till the day comes when he isn't bound by "national security" and can have a bowl of chili with Chris Matthews (I'm not making this up) and tell him the real story. And then, over chili, once Chris matthews hears the "real story" he is going to be so pissed at Congress for "trying to pull that".
 
Yeah, tell it to Tony Snow, who was on Hardball last night actually claiming that in fact, Muehler did not contradict Gonzo, that in fact, Comey did not contradict Gonzo, and he can't wait till the day comes when he isn't bound by "national security" and can have a bowl of chili with Chris Matthews (I'm not making this up) and tell him the real story. And then, over chili, once Chris matthews hears the "real story" he is going to be so pissed at Congress for "trying to pull that".
See, that is "spin". Stating that somebody contradicted another, if they have, is not "lean".

So, Tony, if you are reading.... See this ^^^.
 
See, that is "spin". Stating that somebody contradicted another, if they have, is not "lean".

So, Tony, if you are reading.... See this ^^^.

I'm telling ya, you throw in a hotdog and it could have been a conversation between you and BB. (Snow would be BB, of course)
 
IMHO, it doesn't matter why they were let go. the president has the constitutional right to let them go. what is wrong is misleading the public as to why. is short, If you are going to answere at all, TELL THE TRUTH" They lied to the public, and the congress, and thus in reality it equates with Clinton's lies. He was impeached for the lies, so also should Gonzo and company.

The President does have the right to let his appointed and confirmed by the Senate prosecutors go as long as his reasons for letting them go, doesn't break the Law.

(He can't let someone go for racial reasons, etc, he can't fire them to stop an investigation they are working on etc....)
 
Back
Top