Prophet For A Dying Empire

Socrtease said:
A high school physics teacher named David Chandler objected to NIST’s initial claim, pointing out that, based on video footage of Building 7’s destruction, NIST’s claim contradicted “a publicly visible, easily measurable quantity.”[iii] Mr. Chandler wrote a comment to NIST, saying, “Acknowledgement of and accounting for an extended period of free fall in the collapse of WTC 7 must be a priority if NIST is to be taken seriously.”[iv]

Responding to the criticism, NIST in its final report issued in November 2008 did finally acknowledge that Building 7 descended at free fall. According to NIST, “This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories, or 32.0 meters (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s [a period of 2.25 seconds].”[v] However, NIST did not attempt to explain how Building 7’s free fall descent could have occurred.
Click to expand...

This too will be ignored.
 
Also the NIST report your link talks about is the July 08 report. By November, after confronted by a high school physics teacher, NIST changes their report.
 
Socrtease said:
If you go here, you will see that NIST backs off of its 40% slower claim.

http://rememberbuilding7.org/free-fall-collapse/
Click to expand...

Overall the time from start to finish was 5.4 seconds which was 40% slower than freefall. There was a short period of time where it was in actual freefall and then slowed up again as it encountered resistance again.

What I have never been able to understand is when were the controlled explosives supposed to have been put in!! How could you put them into a occupied building occupied 24/7 and keep it secret?
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
Overall the time from start to finish was 5.4 seconds which was 40% slower than freefall. There was a short period of time where it was in actual freefall and then slowed up again as it encountered resistance again.

What I have never been able to understand is when were the controlled explosives supposed to have been put in!! How could you put them into a occupied building occupied 24/7 and keep it secret?
Click to expand...
No, if you had ANY intellectual honesty abouut you you would go see that the 5.4 sec time starts with absolutely no movement indicating collapse at all. IN FACT, NIST's claim of 5.4 seconds would mean that the building began at frame 16 of the video, when in reality it does not start until frame 40, and there was now difference in the roof line till frame 46. Go to
and watch what REALLY happens instead of just swallowing the pablum fed to you by NIST, even though they back off on that by November.
 
Socrtease said:
No, if you had ANY intellectual honesty abouut you you would go see that the 5.4 sec time starts with absolutely no movement indicating collapse at all. IN FACT, NIST's claim of 5.4 seconds would mean that the building began at frame 16 of the video, when in reality it does not start until frame 40, and there was now difference in the roof line till frame 46. Go to
and watch what REALLY happens instead of just swallowing the pablum fed to you by NIST, even though they back off on that by November.
Click to expand...

So if you were in court and someone asked what was the motive, who did it and when, what would you say? To my mind, you can often judge the veracity or otherwise of something by the type of people that are supporting it. A good rule of thumb is if Davis Icke is one of them then it is bullshit. Did anybody see any giant lizards near WT7?
 
Last edited:
Aoxomoxoa said:
It does seem very odd that when you ask any of them for the motive, the means and the method they go strangely silent.
Click to expand...

Yes. They are all structural engineers now.

Of course they know the motive. Bush and Cheney needed a reason to go to war with Iraq and take their oil or kill brown people or fill up GITMO or.........

Of course they also won't explain how someone was able to place all of the charges necessary to collapse the buildings without being noticed and how nobody has spilled the beans.

This sounds like a job for Oliver Stone ;)
 
I Love America said:
Yes. They are all structural engineers now.

Of course they know the motive. Bush and Cheney needed a reason to go to war with Iraq and take their oil or kill brown people or fill up GITMO or.........

Of course they also won't explain how someone was able to place all of the charges necessary to collapse the buildings without being noticed and how nobody has spilled the beans.

This sounds like a job for Oliver Stone ;)
Click to expand...

In WT7 alone you would have to place charges on a very large number of columns on many different floors. This would have to be done by removing the walls, exposing the steel columns and putting them back again without anybody noticing. I am just wondering how much you would have to pay a contractor to keep their mouth shut??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top