Question for evolutionists

[Fentoine Lum]

Some simple facts. In mammals, a circulatory system is useless without blood. Also, blood is useless without a circulatory system. Neither one can exist without the other. So how did we acquire a circulatory system that pumps blood through our bodies? It's a simple question.

You're simply ignoring information posted here already. See if you can locate the post. Then see "open circulatory system".

 

[Fentoine Lum]

It depends on who you ask!

I'm not aware of insects fouling their own habitat like humans do, now bacteria and viruses ....

 

[Into the Night]

It comes down to belly buttons!

Did Adam and Eve have a belly button?

If you can't answer that, then I can't give you credit for knowing much of anything else!

An interesting method of judging other arguments by. Quite unusual. Useless, of course.

 

[CFM]

You sound like you're a tad upset you didn't get the insult.

You sound like you're a lot upset that you failed to insult.

 

[Fentoine Lum]

What circulatory system exists without blood? How can you call it a circulatory system at all?

Open circulatory systems. Read through the thread.

 

[CFM]

It depends on who you ask!

Perhaps those that think someone born a biological male can be a female because HE feels like it would think they are the same thing.

 

[Fentoine Lum]

You sound like you're a lot upset that you failed to insult.

Yup, you're clearly triggered and insulted.

 

[CFM]

Hominid life arose in Africa, your ultimate descendants go back to Africa.

That's the claim of those that adhere to the theory of evolution. I don't.

 

[Fentoine Lum]

Perhaps those that think someone born a biological male can be a female because HE feels like it would think they are the same thing.

No, no connection whatsoever, this just isn't your topic. Do you have one?

 

[Fentoine Lum]

That's the claim of those that adhere to the theory of evolution. I don't.

No hon, all of science is settled on that unless you've a discovery you'd like to publish.

 

[CFM]

Yup, you're clearly triggered and insulted.

You can't trigger or insult someone that is your superior boy. Trying to do so only proves you're triggered and you insult yourself. When are you going to accept your inferiority?

 

[Into the Night]

Exactly. Science requires OBSERVATION, REPRODUCTION, and CONSISTENCY. Evolution has been debunked every time it is placed to the test of the Scientific Method. (If not show me the experiment that confirms evolution, one life form morphing into another after life was created from nothing. As I said...its a faith based belief void of even the Prima Facie evidence required to support it. With every statement from an evolutionist.....there are many demonstrated DOUBTS provided to accept it as a common sense truth.

First everything came from nothing, That from Hawking. Next we must accept that every element came from the two basic elements found after the big ban (another unprovable theory) …….Hydrogen and Helium...somehow morphed into all the elements found on the periodic table of elements. Then we must accept that life came from DEAD MATTER (when no such example has ever been witnessed)….then we must believe that a single asexual cell morphed into complex examples of life that require a male and a female to procreate. Then we must accept that fish (cold blooded life) morphed into land dwelling warm blooded mammals.

Should I go on?

Actually, science is just a set of falsifiable theories. The Theory of Evolution is not falsifiable. The Theory of Natural Selection (the theory that Darwin created) has been falsified.

No theory of science is ever proven. Not amount of supporting evidence will ever prove anything. A single piece of conflicting evidence will destroy a theory. Science does not use supporting evidence.

You bring up not the Theory of Evolution, but the Theory of Abiogenesis. This too is not falsifiable. Science has no theories about past unobserved events. The only way to test them is to go back in time to see what actually happened. That's not possible.

 

[CFM]

No hon, all of science is settled on that unless you've a discovery you'd like to publish.

Unless those claiming it happened that way witnessed it first hand, their "science" is junk.

 

[Fentoine Lum]

But Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection does not allow for random mutations. Only selected mutations. The others die off.

No. Random mutations occur routinely, you misunderstand completely. Selection is something else altogether.

 

[Fentoine Lum]

Unless those claiming it happened that way witnessed it first hand, their "science" is junk.

Science is not something you understand at all. Rather clearly. But you can make up whatever ya like.

 

[CFM]

No, no connection whatsoever, this just isn't your topic. Do you have one?

You are correct. A biological male can't be a female and insects and humans aren't the same thing.

Next.

 

[CFM]

Science is not something you understand at all. Rather clearly. But you can make up whatever ya like.

Apparently the concept that unless you witnessed it happen, it didn't occur.

 

[Fentoine Lum]

That's the claim of those that adhere to the theory of evolution. I don't.

We know you cannot abide objective reality.

 

[Fentoine Lum]

Apparently the concept that unless you witnessed it happen, it didn't occur.

I haven't witnessed you play banjo so you can't?

 

[Into the Night]

What’s the point of asking a question when you think you know the answer already? What’s the point of anyone trying to answer you when you’ve declared that your answer is the only rational possibility?

What’s the point of pretending to be an expert in a field that it’s quite obvious you’ve never studied? I think there’s a passion for easy answers in the creationist community. Like you want to feel like you know up from down but you don’t want to put any effort in.

If you seriously want to know about this stuff, we live in a time of unparalleled access to relatively inexpensive books, lectures, museum exhibits, etc. I’d be happy to give some recommendations. But it’s a bit weird to throw gauntlets down on stuff you’ve never studied and then expect either 1) people to hold your hand through an entire scientific discipline or 2) cower before your unfamiliarity with the material.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The trouble with any of these books, lectures, websites, etc. is that they are just opinions and arguments in and of themselves. They are written by people just like you. They may be quite wrong. Even school and college textbooks have been wrong from time to time.

Just because someone bound some written paper together or put up a website doesn't make it automatically True.

The question posed at the beginning of this thread is a valid one for discussion here. Copping out to point at the arguments of others is not a valid reference. That's just lazy thinking. It simply means you can't present an argument of your own on the matter.