Question for our gun enthusiast friends.

[rjhenn]

Since the original intent was in the context of a militia, rather than idiots of your level thinking you can carry any gun, anywhere, anytime, you’re the one ignorant of the original intent.

The original intent was that all citizens should be familiar with the use of guns so that they would be better suited to service in a militia. Open carry was the standard of the day. You, as usual, haven't a clue.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[USFREEDOM911]

How many machine gun deaths are there?

Which law has prevented anything from occurring?

 

[rjhenn]

You’re an Illiterate fool. You also don’t have a fucking clue whether not having guns at schools has made things worse.

Why do you like to lie so much?

How many mass school shootings were there before schools were gun free zones?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

[emoji38]up:

Yeah, he and four other justices are wrong and a clueless punk like you isn’t. Priceless!

They only partly went with the Constitution, the rest was them trying to justify their personal prejudices.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Yeah, I know. I know, sonny boy.

But that's all right as long as they support your personal prejudices.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

How many machine gun deaths are there?

How many were there before the 'ban'?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

The original meaning was in the context of the militia. That’s clear. How did Heller restore that?

You are both delusional and ignorant of English grammar. The introductory clause doesn't modify or limit the main clause. It's merely a justification.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

We’ve already determined that you have ZERO experience with gun violence. So, you post out of ignorance. But that’s obvious.

We've already determined that your experience with gun violence, or rather, the aftermath of gun violence, has driven you insane.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[rjhenn]

Sonny boy, my degree is from a world class university. Yet, you are homeschooled

They don't appear to have been very successful in teaching you basic grammar, or how to conduct a rational argument.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[domer76]

How many mass school shootings were there before schools were gun free zones?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

When were schools not gun free? There were never any guns in the schools I ever attended.

What a stupid fucking question. Is that the tyoe of logic your mommy taught you in homeschool?

 

[domer76]

We've already determined that your experience with gun violence, or rather, the aftermath of gun violence, has driven you insane.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Sure haven’t, dumbfuck. I’m just reflecting reality from experience. And here you are, trying to argue out of ignorance

 

[domer76]

The original intent was that all citizens should be familiar with the use of guns so that they would be better suited to service in a militia. Open carry was the standard of the day. You, as usual, haven't a clue.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Another lie. The colonials did not walk around with their guns everywhere they went.

 

[domer76]

Which law has prevented anything from occurring?

Asked and answered, stupid shit.

Learn English.

 

[domer76]

They only partly went with the Constitution, the rest was them trying to justify their personal prejudices.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Yeah, sure they were, homeschool.

 

[domer76]

But that's all right as long as they support your personal prejudices.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

My personal knowledge, observations and experiences. Three things you lack.

 

[domer76]

How many were there before the 'ban'?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Quite a few in the day, which forced the National Firearms Act.

I understand why you don’t want to respond.

 

[domer76]

You are both delusional and ignorant of English grammar. The introductory clause doesn't modify or limit the main clause. It's merely a justification.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I keep trying to educate you, dumbfuck homeschool, but it doesn’t take.

The original wording, by Madison, of the second, included a conscientious objector clause. There’s only one reason to allow one to opt out of having to train or use a weapon. That’s in the context of a military use.

There’s your grammar, homeschool.

 

[StoneByStone]

And your proof of your claim, is...…………………..what??

I wasn't making a claim. Just telling him that he should present evidence of his claim instead of just telling people to google it.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

How many mass school shootings were there before schools were gun free zones?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Excellent question and one I've asked; but received no intelligent answer.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

When were schools not gun free? There were never any guns in the schools I ever attended.

What a stupid fucking question. Is that the tyoe of logic your mommy taught you in homeschool?

But it's not our fault that you've just turned 20; because before the ban, many students had weapons in their vehicles and when hunting after school.

And surprise, no school shootings.

So answer the question:

How many school shootings were there, before the "gun free zones"??