DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
What's your problem?
What's your problem?
The biggest problem I have today is that its raining and I can't go fishing.
Other than that, my problems are that the political scene has become too partisan and that there are too many ignorant people spouting nonsense and claiming it is fact.
How about you? What is your problem?
Thanks for the confirmation of what most of us already had figured out.
Yeah I pegged you from the outset as the same guy, now Cancel3.
Several of us here have come to the same conclusion independently, based on the obvious evidence:
- same posting style;
- same reliance on straw men;
- same voracious appetite for posting;
- same support of gay rights;
- same penchant for cheer leading;
- same location ('bama);
- same support of Crimson Tide;
- same ex-navy;
- same political positions;
- same abhorrence with social conservatism;
- same fixation of me;
- knowledge of posts before you joined;
- joined date so close to Solitary's last post;
- as demonstrated in this thread, answers so readily to Solitary.
Just because there's no physical evidence doesn't mean that the jury can't convict. There are simply too many unexplained coincidences.
15. same ignorance of the obvious in the post he's responding to;
16. same inability to win a debate;
17. same insistence that he's won one.
18. Posts on this message board.
18 coincidences so far. I'll add more as you reveal them. Then I'll estimate chances for each, then multiply all together to prove the case with a preponderance of evidence, also known as balance of probabilities.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_burden_of_proof#Preponderance_of_the_evidence
Several of us here have come to the same conclusion independently, based on the obvious evidence:
- same posting style;
- same reliance on straw men;
- same voracious appetite for posting;
- same support of gay rights;
- same penchant for cheer leading;
- same location ('bama);
- same support of Crimson Tide;
- same ex-navy;
- same political positions;
- same abhorrence with social conservatism;
- same fixation of me;
- knowledge of posts before you joined;
- joined date so close to Solitary's last post;
- as demonstrated in this thread, answers so readily to Solitary.
Just because there's no physical evidence doesn't mean that the jury can't convict. There are simply too many unexplained coincidences.
Winterborn, are you solitary?
I mean you are from same area, similar political viewpoints, though I suppose I haven't seen the maineman hate.
Now this has got me curious.
They can identify themselves.Would you care to name the "several of us", that you mentioned?
They can identify themselves.
Solitary and maineman were buds due to their similar naval experience. My attacks on maineman are why Solitary latched onto me as public enemy #1.
Would you care to name the "several of us", that you mentioned?