Question for Solitary

[USFREEDOM911]

Did you ask them, and did they respond?

I'm letting them speak for themselves, or not.

 

[DamnYankee]

I'm letting them speak for themselves, or not.

So the answer would be "no".

 

[USFREEDOM911]

So the answer would be "no".

They haven't said, so to which question are you attributing the "no" to??

 

[DamnYankee]

Duh.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Duh.

I thought that would confuse you and I'm glad to see that I'm disappointed.

 

[DamnYankee]

I thought that would confuse you and I'm glad to see that I'm disappointed.

You mean 'not disappointed'?

Dude, you can't even get your insults straight.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

You mean 'not disappointed'?

Dude, you can't even get your insults straight.

And yet, even with my missing word,you understood.
Why would I want to insulte you, when the truth is so much more convienant!!

 

[DamnYankee]

And yet, even with my missing word,you understood.
Why would I want to insulte[sic] you, when the truth is so much more convienant[sic]!!

Holy shit. Dude...

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Holy shit. Dude...

You're correct in using the "face palm", if all you can do is focus on my typo's and my fingerlexia.

How ironic.
SM builds yet another strawman.

 

[DamnYankee]

You're not using the term properly.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

You're not using the term properly.

I never even typed the term properly.
Why would I want to use the term, properly??

 

[Legion Fag]

Yeah I pegged you.

Again with the hypocracy? Xanadu!!

 

[Canceled2]

Several of us here have come to the same conclusion independently, based on the obvious evidence:

1. same posting style;
2. same reliance on straw men;
3. same voracious appetite for posting;
4. same support of gay rights;
5. same penchant for cheer leading;
6. same location ('bama);
7. same support of Crimson Tide;
8. same ex-navy;
9. same political positions;
10. same abhorrence with social conservatism;
11. same fixation of me;
12. knowledge of posts before you joined;
13. joined date so close to Solitary's last post;
14. as demonstrated in this thread, answers so readily to Solitary.

Just because there's no physical evidence doesn't mean that the jury can't convict. There are simply too many unexplained coincidences.

You forgot about the birdie who spilled the proverbial beans about who he was.

 

[DamnYankee]

You forgot about the birdie who spilled the proverbial beans about who he was.

Please remind me.