We will indeed.We'll see about this.....
We will indeed.We'll see about this.....
We'll see.I stand by my prediction: trump will go to the first debate, lose the first debate, and will flee the second debate.
we saw... lol. the quoted prediction had no lifespan at all, ay?We'll see.
You were right.As bizarre as it sounds, I think trump will be the nominee. A sane party would never consider nominating trump, but the Republicans have long since left sane. And I cannot see an obvious thing that would prevent trump from being nominated (other than death). You would think an indictment, and criminal trial would stop trump's campaign, but evidently not.
I would be overjoyed to be wrong.
While most voters will chose Harris, Trump is likely to pull out another electoral win.
Trump will lose the popular vote by 7-10 million votes.
It's entirely possible that Trump actually WINS the so-called "popular vote" (that is completely irrelevant to Presidential elections). If he "loses it", he "loses it" by no more than 2.5 million, let alone 7-10 million.That sounds about right.
Trump has never won the popular vote, and Republicans have only done it once since 1988 (2004 with 50.7%), and even then that was questionable because of voting inconsistencies in Ohio.It's entirely possible that Trump actually WINS the so-called "popular vote" (that is completely irrelevant to Presidential elections). If he "loses it", he "loses it" by no more than 2.5 million, let alone 7-10 million.
He lost 2016 by 3MIf he "loses it", he "loses it" by no more than 2.5 million, let alone 7-10 million.
The past is not the present. The so called "popular vote" doesn't decide Presidential elections so it is irrelevant.Trump has never won the popular vote,
Irrelevant.and Republicans have only done it once since 1988 (2004 with 50.7%),
No it wasn't. We have the "safest most secure elections ever", remember?and even then that was questionable because of voting inconsistencies in Ohio.
Trump will never win the popular vote, either.The past is not the present.
Yeah, we all know about the handicap Conservatives need in order to be competitive in Presidential Elections.The so called "popular vote" doesn't decide Presidential elections so it is irrelevant.
He won 2016 by 74. (Actually 77 due to faithless electors)He lost 2016 by 3M
He lost 2020 by 7M
He seems to double his electoral losses every time he runs.
We are talking about popular vote on this thread, and you piped up that you thought Trump would win it.Irrelevant.
Talking about 2004 you stupid fucking idiot.No it wasn't. We have the "safest most secure elections ever", remember?
LMAO!He won 2016 by 74. (Actually 77 due to faithless electors)
But you don't actually believe that.2020 faulted due to election fraud.
(see my post #27 for what I actually said)you piped up that you thought Trump would win it [re: the so-called popular vote].
Me too you stupid fucking idiot.Talking about 2004 you stupid fucking idiot.
(see my post #27 for what I actually said)
It's entirely possible that Trump actually WINS the so-called "popular vote" (that is completely irrelevant to Presidential elections).