Rachel Maddow gave a very important history lesson last night.

Bourbon said:
In 1960 the Russians approached Democrat Adlai Stephenson. They wanted him to win the the presidency. They said we like you, how can we help you. Adlia declined the offer, wrote down what was said and reported it to the Republican president, Ike. They did not inform the public until years later.

Kennedy won the democratic nomination, the Russians approached Kennedy. We like you, how can we help you win. Kennedy said we don't do that here in America. He declined.

In 1964 the same thing happened to Johnson. He declined.

It did not happen again until 2015,2016. The Russians approached Trump and said we like you. How can we help you win. Trump said yes. Its that simple, what Russia did is not new. What is new is Trump did what no law abiding American would ever do. He turned traitor and said yes.


[h=1]How Adlai Stevenson Stopped Russian Interference in the 1960 Election[/h][h=2]The Soviets offered the former presidential candidate propaganda support if he ran in 1960, an offer he politely declined[/h][FONT="]
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smar...-1960-election-180961681/#7xQpOIdE7gdZkZOu.99
[/FONT]
Click to expand...

Conspicuously missing from your link... anything about Trump. Have any evidence to back up this part of your post:

It did not happen again until 2015,2016. The Russians approached Trump and said we like you. How can we help you win. Trump said yes. Its that simple, what Russia did is not new. What is new is Trump did what no law abiding American would ever do. He turned traitor and said yes.
Click to expand...

Didn't think so.

Also, Rachel Maddow is a retard.
 
Controlled Opposition said:
Freddy Fender served in the U.S. Marin Corp from 1953 through 56.
Click to expand...

He was a legend in brownsville, texas when I lived there after he got out of the marines.

His songs were always playing on the jukebox at Higgies cafe while I was being waited on by a mexican queen. My uncle, captain Johnny, who I worked for, was usually there with me for breakfast was a racist. He called Mexicans, ​monkeys.
 
Sirthinksalot said:
Conspicuously missing from your link... anything about Trump. Have any evidence to back up this part of your post:



Didn't think so.

Also, Rachel Maddow is a retard.
Click to expand...

Rachel Maddow is anything but a retard.

She is very intelligent...and the thing she does, essentially nightly long monologues filled with interesting issues to consider, is something so difficult most people cannot even imagine being able to do it.

One may disagree with her, but anyone who calls her a "retard" is not an especially intelligent individual.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Rachel Maddow is anything but a retard.

She is very intelligent...and the thing she does, essentially nightly long monologues filled with interesting issues to consider, is something so difficult most people cannot even imagine being able to do it.

One may disagree with her, but anyone who calls her a "retard" is not an especially intelligent individual.
Click to expand...
The problem I have with Rachel is similar to the problem an accelerated student would have while sitting in a remedial reading class.

Her setup is unnecessary for many. IMO, she could fit twice the data into her show if she'd just deliver the information without the colorful setup.

Her guests are typically on point when called on to back up her assertions, and she is a great host in the sense that she doesn't interrupt them a. la. Chris Matthews/Joe Scarboro
 
Frank Apisa said:
Rachel Maddow is anything but a retard.

She is very intelligent...and the thing she does, essentially nightly long monologues filled with interesting issues to consider, is something so difficult most people cannot even imagine being able to do it.
One may disagree with her, but anyone who calls her a "retard" is not an especially intelligent individual.
Click to expand...

Right there she lost all the Trumpanzees, who can only absorb information in 140-character tweets or 15-second soundbites. Psychologists blame it on the penchant of their mothers for parking them in front of the TV for long hours as children.

She has a doctorate in poli-sci from Oxford University. Her drooling detractors, on the other hand, were mostly home-schooled by the family dog.
 
Sirthinksalot said:
Conspicuously missing from your link... anything about Trump. Have any evidence to back up this part of your post:



Didn't think so.

Also, Rachel Maddow is a retard.
Click to expand...


Yes I do, but neither YOU, ME or ANYONE ELSE will receive that information BEFORE the Mueller Indictments and Trail ... or did you READ Robert Mueller Court Filings he submitted on Wednesday.

;)
 
Well at least we know where the lefties get their marching orders from

I seem to recall lefties claiming they don’t need shows like Maddow for information. And here we find out they are glued to it. Probably even post her thoughts word for word.

Good soldiers
 
Frank Apisa said:
Rachel Maddow is anything but a retard.

She is very intelligent...and the thing she does, essentially nightly long monologues filled with interesting issues to consider, is something so difficult most people cannot even imagine being able to do it.

One may disagree with her, but anyone who calls her a "retard" is not an especially intelligent individual.
Click to expand...

she is a partisan shill.

Basically Sean Hannity in drag and on the left.

she (like Hannity) represent what is wrong with politics here
 
I Love America said:
Well at least we know where the lefties get their marching orders from

I seem to recall lefties claiming they don’t need shows like Maddow for information. And here we find out they are glued to it. Probably even post her thoughts word for word.

Good soldiers
Click to expand...


Anytime you want to post your Rebuttal to those FACTS ... please do so ... otherwise STFU
 
zymurgy said:
she is a partisan shill.

Basically Sean Hannity in drag and on the left.

she (like Hannity) represent what is wrong with politics here
Click to expand...
You are free to post examples of Maddow offering overt lies and fabrications, the way Hannity does on a nightly basis. On the rare occasions when she got her facts wrong, she airs retractions the next night.

Contrast that with Hannity and his conspiracy theories.
 
Althea said:
You are free to post examples of Maddow offering overt lies and fabrications, the way Hannity does on a nightly basis. On the rare occasions when she got her facts wrong, she airs retractions the next night.

Contrast that with Hannity and his conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...


Wait for it ... but not too long.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top