are you going to explain how you didn't claim they didn't benefit all the while claiming exactly the opposite and show us how that wasn't a flip flopping lie?
I'm all ears.
LIAR
LMAO @ you're all ears on a forum that is written. You really are too stupid.
Okay, let's remove any doubt how dishonest a moron you really are; I clearly was illustrating that YOUR claims of LiHEAP being a benefit were NOT in reality a benefit in that it merely turns citizens into dependent wards of the State. You see dependency on the Government as being a benefit; I see it as the opposite. It is a dishonest attempt by opportunistic politicians to buy votes from fools and create dependency where none existed before.
I also explained why I believed this; because, (1) you cannot show how people were freezing to death or dying of starvation before these programs were implemented; and (2) because it is the fodder for dishonest politicians to BUY the votes of low information dullards who think that they cannot get by without a Government handout. What was happening before LiEAP/LiHEAP were created? Can you show us all the people who were freezing to death?
The FEDERAL Government should NOT be in the business of PROVIDING anything for ANYONE. Please find where it says so in the Constitution.
YOU think such programs are a benefit because it makes you feel good about yourself and supports the laughably stupid position that Liberals care more than anyone else on the planet. But how is creating dependency good for society?
Now to your equally ignorant claims that this reduces income inequality between the rich and the poor; NO, it does not because the incomes of the rich and the poor did not change. And no amount of tax law will change the status and disposition of that income. It also presumes that the poor do not make the choices that make them poor or examine the real causes of poverty.
But as is typical with a liberal left mentality, you want to GIVE people stuff and take political credit for it without doing anything about the CAUSE. It goes back to the old axiom; give a person a fish, and they will eat for a day. Teach him to fish, and he will eat for a lifetime. Dishonest dunces like you merely want to give people a fish and then take credit for how much you care. Conservatives like me want to teach them to fish so that they do not have to be dependent wards of the state.
Carry on; I don't expect answering this a hundred more times will make you less dishonest or less ignorant.
P.S. Five years into this Presidency, and the best clueless leftards can argue about is for more programs for the increasing levels of poverty and income disparity as a direct result of the moronic divisive job killing policies of this dunce in the White House you support. Nothing says FAIL better than this.